Reviews of Motorola Edge 50 Ultra phone, price, technical specifications, design, screen, software, hardware, battery life and charging, and other specifications of this phone.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra review

The Motorola Edge 50 continues to grow today with new additions to the lineup. After launching the Edge 50 Pro earlier this month, the OEM is now introducing the Edge 50 Ultra and Edge 50 Fusion. As expected, the Ultra is at the top of the range, while the Fusion is the most affordable of the three.

We will take a closer look at the Edge 50 Ultra and its flagship features. After all, this is Motorola’s top-of-the-line smartphone for 2024, and it offers a ton of premium features, including AI capabilities and a Pantone-calibrated display and cameras for more accurate and vivid color reproduction.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra specifications at a glance:

• Body:  161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6mm, 197g; Victus gorilla glass front, acetate back (wood based) or silicon polymer back (vegan leather), aluminum frame; IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 minutes).
• Display:  6.70 inch OLED, 1B color, 144Hz, HDR10+, resolution 1220x2712px, aspect ratio 20.01:9, 444ppi.
• Chipset:  Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm): Octa-core (1×3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4×2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3×2.0 GHz Cortex-A520); Adreno 735.
• Memory:  512 GB RAM 12 GB, 1 TB 16 GB RAM; UFS 4.0.
• Operating System/Software:  Android 14.
• Rear camera:  Wide (main)  : 50 MP, 1/1.3-inch f/1.6, 2.4 µm, multi-directional PDAF, laser autofocus, OIS;  Telephoto  : 64 MP, f/2.4, 1.4 µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom;  Ultra wide angle  : 50 MP, f/2.0, 1.28 µm, 122 degrees, AF.
• Front camera:  50 MP, f/1.9, 1.28 µm, AF.
• Videography:  Rear camera  : 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS.  Front camera  : 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps.
• Battery:  4500 mAh; 125W wired, 50W wireless, 10W reverse wireless.
• Connectivity:  5G; two SIM cards; Wi-Fi 7; BT 5.4; NFC, UWB, USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 with DP 1.4 support.
• Other specifications:  fingerprint reader (under the display, optical); stereo speakers; Ready to support 6.

AI functions are possible thanks to the new Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset, which sits between last year’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and this year’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. while maintaining a relatively low price. Motorola seems to be looking for a more affordable flagship segment.

But despite the small agreement in the chipset department, Motorola does not make cameras, displays and chargers. The 6.7-inch OLED panel packs all the punch, runs at up to 144Hz and can charge up to 125W (wireless is 50W). The camera hardware looks good on paper. We’ve got a 50MP main sensor assisted by a 50MP ultra-wide unit and a 64MP 3x telephoto camera with a reliable f/2.4 aperture. Even the selfie unit is 50MP with autofocus, which is rare even in the ultra-premium segment.

Designing

The overall design language of the Edge 50 Ultra follows the Edge 50 family, and since the screen is the same as the Edge 50 Pro, the two phones feel the same in the hand. The Ultra comes in two variants – with a vegetable leather or wooden back. The latter is a bold approach, but will likely appeal to some.

Available colors include Forest Gray and Peach Fuzz (both vegetable leather options) and Nordic Wood (pictured below).

Of course, the wooden back is not pure wood. Motorola has used a special coating for the surface that preserves the wood-like texture while protecting it from water and oil, so it doesn’t change color or lose its appearance. Either way, the imitation is pretty good – almost like real wood.

The Edge 50 Ultra and the Edge 50 Pro look so similar that it would be hard to tell them apart if they both had plant-based leather. Camera hardware ditches the Edge 50 Ultra, as the telephoto uses a periscope lens and the round LED flash is replaced by a smaller, vertical flash.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Edge 50 Pro

The front and back panels are still rounded, which helps with grip, and to be honest, the wooden back is easier to hold. It also brings back a distant memory of Motorola’s Moto X in 2013 with its bamboo and wooden back.

The side frame is still aluminum, while the front glass is Gorilla Glass Victus. And for a 6.7-inch device with this many cameras, the weight gain at 197 grams is pretty impressive. Leather and wood are lighter than glass, so that could be an explanation.

As expected from a high-end smartphone like the Edge 50 Ultra, the device has IP68 ingress protection.

Hardware

The Edge 50 Ultra and Pro have very similar hardware for the most part, but as we mentioned earlier, the Edge 50 Ultra has a more powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chip that delivers flagship-level performance and features. One notable limitation is the chipset’s inability to record 8K videos. 4K is capped.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Edge 50 Pro

The curved OLED panel is a small step above the competition in terms of refresh rate, as the Edge 50 Ultra’s 6.7-inch display supports a 144Hz refresh rate. It remains to be seen whether Motorola has been able to make the best use of the display’s capabilities.

In addition to the 144Hz refresh rate, the panel also has support for HDR10+, 10-bit color depth, and DC dimming for those who might be sensitive to regular PWM dimming. It can also push up to a maximum brightness of 2,500 nits, but we suspect this will be achievable in small patches during HDR video playback.

For a complete multimedia experience, Motorola has put more effort into the speakers as well. They are tuned by Dolby Atmos and support Dolby Head Tracking.

A fairly average 4,500 mAh battery keeps the lights on, but capacity isn’t everything. We’ll see if Motorola’s hardware and software tweaks can compensate for the smaller-than-usual battery pack. It is good that Edge 50 Ultra is equipped with 125W wired charging and 50W wireless charging.

The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has two significant hardware advantages over some of its competitors. It supports ultra-wideband connectivity (a feature only seen on a handful of Android smartphones) and USB 3.1 gen 2 with DisplayPort 1.4 compatibility. It works well with Motorola’s Ready For desktop environment.

With the launch of the Galaxy A55 5G and A35 5G phones, both of which are among the mid-range products of this company, we saw many improvements compared to the previous versions.

Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy A35

Samsung’s mid-range products are improving every year. Now, with the release of Galaxy A55 5G and A35 5G, both of which are among the mid-range products of this company, we saw many improvements compared to the previous versions. In this article, we are going to compare A55 and A35 phones. These two phones are very similar in terms of appearance, but in other parts, there are differences in these two phones, each of which can be very important for users. Stay with us until the end of the Samsung A55 and A35 phone comparison.

As mentioned, it’s hard to tell the difference between the two phones based on their specs. However, we see that when comparing more closely, their differences become more prominent.

Comparison of the video of Samsung A55 and A35

The mid-range Samsung Galaxy A55 and A35 phones have been made available to us by the ” Technolife ” online store. Teknolife is one of the largest collections of smartphones, wearable gadgets, and other electronic devices. To get more information about Technolife’s product portfolio, enter the website of this online store.

Specifications

Design and display

Both Galaxy A55 5G and Galaxy A35 5G use the design language of Galaxy S24. It is for this reason that these two models are very similar in appearance. However, last year we saw that Samsung’s mid-range to flagship phones were all similar in terms of design, and the difference was seen in the hardware and build quality.

The Galaxy A55 5G uses metal and Gorilla Glass Victus+, which is an excellent specification for a mid-range device. The A35 also has a glass back frame without Gorilla Glass protection and a plastic frame. The most obvious difference between these two phones in terms of design and build quality is related to the material of their frames, which we see in the bigger brother, the A55, which this year has used a brushed aluminum frame.

Continuing the comparison of A55 and A35, we should mention that in terms of size, both are almost similar. The Galaxy A55 5G is slightly slimmer and lighter. The Galaxy A35 5G is about 4 grams heavier, but the difference is barely noticeable.

Both phones have IP67 water and dust resistance. This means that both phones are equally resistant to dust and water. Admittedly, that’s a step down from the IP68 certification found on many Samsung phones, but in the phone category, it doesn’t matter much if you can drop the phone deeper.

Regarding the port and buttons, we should mention that a new curve can be seen on the right side of the phones. This new design on the right edge of these two phones makes it easier to recognize the location of the buttons during use. In addition, it has helped to make the phone comfortable. Above this section, there are power buttons and volume buttons. There is also a USB Type-C port on the bottom edge that you can use to charge phones using the cable in the box. Of course, don’t expect that there is any charge inside the box. In recent years, Samsung has generally removed the charger from its product box and only offers a charging cable.

Galaxy A35 5G and Galaxy A55 5G both have 6.6-inch screens and in terms of screen dimensions, both are slightly larger than last year’s version. This is for those who are interested in bigger phones; It is good news. Although the difference compared to last year is only 0.2 inches, this change has made both of these phones feel more premium to the user.

The rest of the display specifications are very close. Each earphone was equipped with Super AMOLED screens and a maximum refresh rate of 120Hz, which provide a very smooth and smooth experience in the user interface and playing games.

Performance and software

Both the Galaxy A55 5G and Galaxy A35 5G are based on Samsung’s mid-range Exynos chips. These two models use Exynos 1480 and Exynos 1380 chips respectively. Considering the history of Gegenios chips and the fact that these chips are mid-range anyway, they should not be compared with the new versions of Snapdragon.

With mid-range Exynos chips in last year’s Galaxy A54 and Galaxy A34, they provided average and acceptable performance. The Galaxy A54 came with the same Exynos 1380 and now the same chip is used in the A35.

Predictably, the Galaxy A55 5G beats the Galaxy A35 due to its faster Exynos chip. According to various benchmark tests, the Galaxy A55 outperforms the Galaxy A35 in both GeekBench 6 and 3DMark. This means that Samsung’s new mid-range chip has improved performance compared to last year’s version.

As for memory and storage, both devices are available in three versions. You can get the Galaxy A55 5G with 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of storage. The Galaxy A35 5G comes with 128GB of storage and either 6GB or 8GB of RAM, although a 256GB version with 8GB of RAM is also available for purchase.

Both of these phones came with Android 14 and One UI 6.1 and get up to 4 years of Android updates and 5 years of security updates.

Read More: Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy S23 FE

Comparison of A55 and A35 phones in the camera department

Both the A55 5G and Galaxy A35 5G have triple cameras, but you’ll be using two of those lenses roughly 99% of the time. Why? Because the third lens is for macro photography. Samsung has been using this macro lens in its phones for several years. Although many users don’t use this lens, the company has decided to stick with it instead of using an efficient telephoto lens. We hope to see this change in mid-range phones in next year’s models.

In terms of specifications, the main difference is in the ultra-wide megapixels of the Derby. The Galaxy A55 5G comes with a 50-megapixel main camera and a 12-megapixel ultra-wide camera; While the Galaxy A35 5G is equipped with a 50-megapixel main camera and an 8-megapixel ultra-wide camera. Both phones also have the same 5-megapixel macro camera as mentioned. The main camera of this phone is the same. So most of the photos you’ll take in this mode are similar, but the A55’s ultra-wide shots are better. However, the difference is not so great.

On the front, the Galaxy A55 5G has a 32-megapixel selfie camera. In contrast, the Galaxy A35 5G has a 13-megapixel selfie camera. In terms of quality, the Galaxy A55 5G performs better, but the difference between the photos is not much at first glance. In the portrait mode, the separation of the subject from the background is better in A55. In contrast, the photos of A35 in portrait mode look a little artificial.

Main camera

In terms of quality, we can’t see any major differences between the Galaxy A55 and the Galaxy A35.

The zoom capability of the camera on both devices is not very good, so it is recommended to do zoom photography only when necessary. Otherwise, you may be disappointed with the result. Although 2X digital zoom is suitable for photography, but when you increase the zoom value, the quality of the photos will drop drastically.

Speaker and fingerprint sensor

In terms of sound quality, the A54 and Galaxy A34 weren’t flawless, but both the Galaxy A55 5G and Galaxy A35 5G nailed many of the issues. The Galaxy A55 5G has slightly better sound quality than the Galaxy A35, but the difference is very small and you can tell the difference after listening to the same sound several times. But the sound of A55 is a little louder than A35.

The fingerprint sensor is not the best in any of the phones, but the result is satisfactory. The speed of fingerprint recognition in the A55 phone is half a second faster than the cheaper model.

Battery life and charging

Both phones have 5,000 mAh batteries, which is a standard battery capacity. Of course, the A55 and the Galaxy A35 5G are different in terms of performance due to the difference in the processor, and the A55 has a better performance in this field.

According to the PCMark benchmark that we took to measure the battery life of these phones, the A55 recorded half an hour more screen time. However, this half hour may not be felt in real and daily use.

Conclusion

In this article, we compared A55 and A35 phones. As you have seen in different parts of this article, the biggest difference between these two phones is their frame and camera performance. Although A55 has a more powerful chip, it does not make a difference in the user interface experience. Both of these phones can handle popular games well. The aluminum frame of the A55 phone is one of the advantages of this phone, which can be very important for users. Due to the price difference, these two phones do not show special performance in the A55 model, although, in the video recording department, the A55 phone provides better output due to having a much better stabilizer.