Connect with us

Space

Why we will never live in space?

Published

on

Why we will never live in space?
While from the point of view of many people, living in space will be the definite destiny of humans in the future, there are important obstacles that make it impossible to reach this goal. So why we will never live in space?

Why we will never live in space?

Important points of the article:

  • Humans have evolved to live in the conditions of the earth and have adapted to it. If we leave the earth, we will face many problems both physically and mentally.
  • The risk of cancer due to exposure to cosmic rays and the problems that the human body experiences in microgravity conditions alone can be devastating.
  • Presence in the other world may not be economically justified. There has long been little public support for massive investment in space travel.
  • Attempts to inhabit other planets are associated with numerous other problems, including contaminating other celestial bodies or transferring contamination to Earth.

Why we will never live in space?

NASA plans to return astronauts to the moon in a few years and is investing heavily to realize this project called the Artemis program . Artemis is part of an ambitious and risky plan for a more permanent human presence in the extraterrestrial world.

Companies such as Launch and Launch Alliance and Lockheed Martin are also designing infrastructure for habitation on the moon. Elon Musk has also claimed that SpaceX will turn Mars into a human settlement. But since outer space is designed to kill us, are these plans realistic? Scientific American has addressed the issue of the possibility of human habitation in space and listed the important obstacles facing this goal.

At this year’s Analog Astronaut Conference, none of the problems associated with human habitation in space seemed insurmountable. Scientists and space enthusiasts gathered in Biosphere 2. Biosphere 2 is a small simulated Earth near Tucson, Arizona that contains different biomes of Earth. Among the crowd of participants at the conference, it seemed to be a foregone conclusion that life in space is the inevitable destiny of humans and that we must eventually achieve it.

Biosphere Greenhouse 2

Biosphere 2 Research Center in Arizona has a greenhouse.

In 1991, eight people entered Biosphere 2 and lived there for two years. This strange building with an area of ​​approximately 12,700 square meters is a place where scientists have simulated different environments. In addition to learning about Earth’s ecology, one of the goals of this research center has been to understand how humans can live in space.

The risk of cancer caused by cosmic rays and the problems that the human body experiences in microgravity conditions can be devastating.

Life practice in Biosphere 2 was not successful. The enclosed environment did not produce enough oxygen, water, and food for its inhabitants. The first mission and the second mission, which took place a few years later, were stopped due to interpersonal conflicts and psychological problems among the residents.

Today, people participating in projects like Biosphere 2, which simulate some aspects of long-duration space travel, are called “analog astronauts.” There are analog spaceflight facilities in places as diverse as Utah, Hawaii, Texas, and Antarctica. People in Oman, Kenya, and other countries are also building or planning them. The common goal of all those programs is to learn how we can live away from Earth.

Read More: Catching the first “space wind” by James Webb

Some of the people in Biosphere 2 have participated in simulation projects or built analog spaceflight facilities themselves, and some have come there out of curiosity. Astronomers, geologists, retired military personnel, corporate employees, medical professionals, artists, analysts, lawyers, and other business owners have also participated in this program.

Biosphere Research Center 2

From September 1991 to September 1993, eight people lived at the Biosphere 2 research facility in Arizona, helping scientists figure out how humans could live in space.

The human body cannot really tolerate space. Spaceflight damages DNA, alters the microbiome, disrupts circadian rhythms, impairs vision, increases the risk of cancer, reduces bone and muscle density, suppresses the immune system, and damages the heart. It weakens and drives fluids upwards, which may be harmful to the head in the long run.

Sonja Scherpfer at the University of California, San Francisco, has examined two of the conditions that affect space explorers. His research on mice floating in the International Space Station has shown that the blood vessels that reach the brain become harder in microgravity. Scherpfer and colleagues discovered a molecular pathway that may prevent these cardiovascular changes. However, according to him, maybe the hardening of the veins is a kind of protective mechanism, and loosening them causes other problems.

Scherpfer also wants to find a way to help astronauts’ fragile immune systems, which appear older and have a harder time repairing tissue when they’re in space. The immune system ages rapidly in microgravity conditions. On Earth, he collects biological samples from young and healthy people and sends them into space on tissue chips with astronauts to study how they degrade.

Vision and bone problems are also serious side effects of being in space. When astronauts spend a month or more in space, their eyeballs flatten. Flattening of astronauts’ eyeballs is one aspect of a condition called spaceflight-related eye syndrome, which can cause permanent vision damage.

Bones and muscles are built for life on Earth, which involves the constant pull of gravity. What the body does against gravity to be able to stand and move upright protects the muscles from atrophy and promotes bone growth.

Vision and bone problems are serious side effects of being in space

In space, where there is no gravitational force for the body to fight against, astronauts’ bones and muscles atrophy. That’s why they have to exercise for several hours every day and use special equipment. This equipment helps simulate some of the forces that their anatomy feels on the ground. Of course, even these exercises do not completely prevent muscle and bone atrophy.

Perhaps the most important concern about a body in space is radiation. While radiation is a manageable problem for today’s astronauts flying in low Earth orbit, it is a bigger problem for those going on longer journeys.

Some of the radiation comes from the sun, which emits free protons that can damage DNA and make astronauts seriously ill, especially during solar storms.

Astronauts can use water (for example, pumped into the walls of the shelter) to protect themselves against protons emitted from the sun. However, scientists cannot predict exactly when the Sun will emit large amounts of these particles. So, if, for example, astronauts are exploring the surface of the moon and a solar radiation storm is coming, at best we can predict such an event half an hour in advance. Therefore, we need better predictive power and astronauts to stay close to their blue shields.

If you don’t reach a safe place in time and you are exposed to particles emitted from the sun, you will feel nauseous first. Then you will vomit in your space suit. Vomit can disrupt life support systems or you may inhale it and block your airway. Then there is a decrease in cells such as neutrophils and red blood cells, meaning you can no longer fight germs or deliver oxygen to your tissues properly. You become tired, anemic, and unable to fight infection and you vomit frequently. You may even lose your life.

There is another type of radiation called “Galactic Cosmic Rays” that is not blocked by even a lot of water. These radiations are composed of high-velocity elements (mainly hydrogen, but also completely natural substances within the periodic table), are emitted from celestial events such as supernovae, and have much more energy and mass than a free proton. It is not possible to fully protect astronauts from these radiation. Inadequate shielding of the probes makes the problem worse: When the beams hit an obstacle, they split, producing smaller particles.

The amount of radiation that an astronaut en route to Mars might receive from galactic cosmic rays at any given moment is small, but if he is in a spacecraft or on the planet’s surface for years, the situation changes, and the risk of cancer increases.

Since creating a shield to protect astronauts is not a realistic solution, researchers are investigating how to help the body repair damage caused by radiation. They are also looking to design chemicals that astronauts could use to help repair DNA damage in their potential wounds.

the astronaut

In space, many physical and psychological problems threaten astronauts.

Even if most physical problems can be fixed, the brain is still the problem. A review article published in 2021 in the journal Clinical Neuropsychiatry discussed the psychological risks faced by astronauts in space travel: poor emotional regulation, reduced resilience, increased anxiety and depression, communication problems with the group, sleep disorders, and reduced cognitive and motor performance resulting in Stress occurs.

To visualize the cause of the described problems, imagine yourself inside a small tin can with a few other people, with a deadly atmosphere outside, a monotonous and boring schedule, an unnatural day and night cycle you have to endure, and mission controllers constantly checking on you. are under observation Of course, although physical and psychological problems are severe, they are not necessarily the most immediate obstacles to realizing space settlements.

The bigger issue is cost. Who is going to pay for the construction of the space settlement? If you think billionaire entrepreneurship is funding a space settlement out of adventure, altruism, or other reasons, you’re wrong. Commercial space companies are businesses, and the purpose of businesses is to make money. In the past few years, researchers have tried to estimate the demand for space exploration and extraterrestrial activities.

People usually liken space exploration to human expansion on Earth. But human expansion on earth has been associated with achievements such as mines or agricultural lands. This is while it is not clear what people will achieve by investing in the construction of a space settlement.

surface of the moon

Celestial bodies, including the Moon, are at risk of contamination by microscopic Earth life.

Polls show that most people do not value the adventures of space and are not happy that the taxes that are collected from them go to these activities.

In 2018, in a survey, participants were asked to rate the importance of nine key NASA missions. Only 18 and 13 percent of people thought that sending humans to Mars and the Moon should be a priority. They prioritized efforts to monitor Earth’s weather, observe dangerous asteroids, and conduct basic research in space. Another poll in 2020 found that only 7-8% of respondents believed that sending humans to the moon or Mars should be a top priority.

Most people aren’t happy with their tax dollars being spent on space adventures.

Although history tends to record the previous era of moon travel and exploration as a period of global excitement, polls from the time suggest it was not: according to historians, with the exception of the poll taken at the time of the Apollo 11 moon landing in July 1969. done, during the 1960s most Americans believed that Apollo was not worth the cost. During this decade, in numerous polls, 45 to 60 percent of Americans believed that the government was spending too much on space.

When space agency officials discuss why people should care about human exploration, they often say that it benefits humanity, and sometimes point to things that have become Earth-based technology used by all citizens. One of these cases was the innovation of the telescope mirror, which improved laser eye surgery. However experts say that if you want a particular technology to advance, it’s better to invest directly in that technology instead of going indirectly through an organization like NASA, which costs more.

Aside from the discussion of the moral problem of spending taxes collected from people for space travel, the simpler moral question is, should we really send people into space for these purposes? Apart from the general risk of cancer and general deterioration of the body, the possibility of death of astronauts who intend to live in another world is higher, and even if they survive, many problems will plague them. The important thing is not only to survive but also to enjoy life. This is while living conditions in a place like Mars will be very difficult.

Another problem with human space travel is that microscopic Earth life, which NASA has never been able to completely remove from a spacecraft, may contaminate the Moon, Mars, or Europa. On the other hand, if the destination worlds have unknown life, harmful extraterrestrial microbes can return to Earth with their equipment and may threaten life on Earth.

The efforts of analog astronauts cannot solve the most difficult problems of space travel, including intractable medical problems, the need for huge investments, and important ethical problems; But while we all wait to find out if we will actually leave this planet, these earthbound astronauts will continue to try to escape without leaving the planet, at least for a while.

Space

Black holes may be the source of mysterious dark energy

Published

on

By

black holes
The expansion of black holes in the universe can be a sign of the presence of dark energy at the center of these cosmic giants. The force that drives the growth of the world.

Black holes may be the source of mysterious dark energy

D4-mci

According to new research, supermassive black holes may carry the engines driving the universe’s expansion or mysterious dark energy. The existence of dark energy has been proven based on the observation of stars and galaxies, but so far no one has been able to find out its nature and source.

The familiar matter around us makes up only 5% of everything in the universe. The remaining 27% of the universe is made up of dark matter, which does not absorb or emit any light. On the other hand, a large part of the universe, or nearly 68% of it consists of dark energy.

According to new evidence, black holes may be the source of dark energy that is accelerating the expansion of the universe. This research is the result of the work of 17 astronomers in nine countries, which was conducted under the supervision of the University of Hawaii. British researchers from Raleigh Space, England’s Open University, and King’s College London collaborated in this research.

Black hole accretion pillAn artist’s rendering of a supermassive black hole complete with a fiery accretion disk.

By comparing supermassive black holes spanning 9 billion years of the universe’s history, researchers have found a clue that the greedy giant objects at the heart of most galaxies could be the source of dark energy. The articles of this research were published in The Astrophysical Journal and The Astrophysical Journal Letters on February 2 and 15. Chris Pearson, one of the authors of the study and an astrophysicist at the Appleton Rutherford Laboratory (RAL) in the UK says:

If the theory of this research is correct, it could revolutionize the whole of cosmology, because at least we have found a solution to the origin of dark energy, which has puzzled cosmologists and theoretical physicists for more than twenty years.

The theory that black holes can carry something called vacuum energy (an embodiment of dark energy) is not new, and the discussion of its theory actually goes back to the 1960s; But the new research assumes that dark energy (and therefore the mass of black holes) increases over time as the universe expands. Researchers have shown how much of the universe’s dark energy can be attributed to this process. According to the findings, black holes could hold the answer to the total amount of dark energy in the current universe. The result of this puzzle can solve one of the most fundamental problems of modern cosmology.

Rapid expansion

Our universe began with the Big Bang about 13.7 billion years ago. The energy from this explosion of space once caused the universe to expand so rapidly that all the galaxies were moving away from each other at breakneck speed. However, astronomers expected the rate of this expansion to slow down due to the gravitational influence of all the matter in the universe. This attitude toward the world prevailed until the 1990s; That is when the Hubble Space Telescope made a strange discovery. Observations of distant exploding stars have shown that in the past the universe was expanding at a slower rate than it is now.

Therefore, contrary to the previous idea, not only the expansion of the universe has not slowed down due to gravity, but it is increasing and speeding up. This result was very unexpected and astronomers sought to justify it. Thus, it was assumed that “dark energy” pushes objects away from each other with great power. The concept of dark energy was very similar to a cosmic constant proposed by Albert Einstein that opposes gravity and prevents the universe from collapsing but was later rejected.

Stellar explosions

But what exactly is dark energy? The answer to this question seems to lie in another cosmic mystery: black holes. Black holes are usually born when massive stars explode and die. The gravity and pressure in these intense explosions compress a large amount of material into a small space. For example, a star roughly the same mass as the Sun can be compressed into a space of only a few tens of kilometers.

The gravitational pull of a black hole is so strong that even light cannot escape it and everything is attracted to it. At the center of the black hole is a space called singularity, where matter reaches the point of infinite density. The point is that singularities should not exist in nature.

Speed ​​up dark energyDark energy explains why the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.

Black holes at the center of galaxies are much more massive than black holes from the death of stars. The mass of galactic “massive” black holes can reach millions to billions of times the mass of the Sun. All black holes increase in size by accreting matter and swallowing nearby stars or merging with other black holes; Therefore, we expect these objects to become larger as they age. In the latest paper, researchers investigated the supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies and found that the mass of these objects has increased over billions of years.

Fundamental revision

The researchers compared the past and present observations of elliptical galaxies that lack the star formation process. These dead galaxies have used up all their fuel, and as a result, their increase in the number of black holes over time cannot be attributed to normal processes that involve the growth of black holes by accreting matter.

Instead, the researchers suggested that these black holes actually carry vacuum energy, which has a direct relationship with the expansion of the universe, so as the universe expands, their mass also increases.

Black hole visualizationVisualization of a black hole that could play a fundamental role in dark energy.

Revealing dark energy

Two groups of researchers compared the mass of black holes at the center of two sets of galaxies. They were a young, distant cluster of galaxies with lights originating nine billion years ago, while the closer, older group was only a few million light-years away. Astronomers found that supermassive black holes have grown between seven and twenty times larger than before so this growth cannot be explained simply by swallowing stars or colliding and merging with other black holes.

As a result, it was hypothesized that black holes are probably growing along with the universe, and with a type of hypothetical energy known as dark energy or vacuum that leads to their expansion, they overcome the forces of light absorption and destruction of the stars in their center.

If dark energy is expanding inside the core of black holes, it can solve two long-standing puzzles of Einstein’s general relativity; A theory that shows how gravity affects the universe on massive scales. The new finding firstly proves how the universe does not fall apart due to the overwhelming force of gravity, and secondly, it eliminates the need for singularities (points of infinity where the laws of physics are violated) to describe the workings of the dark heart of black holes.

To confirm their findings, astronomers need more observations of the mass of black holes over time, and at the same time, they need to examine the increase in mass as the universe expands.

Continue Reading

Space

Scientists’ understanding of dark energy may be completely wrong

Published

on

By

dark energy
The standard model of cosmology says that the strength of dark energy should be constant, But inconclusive findings suggest that this force may have weakened.

Scientists’ understanding of dark energy may be completely wrong

On April 4th, astronomers who created the largest and most detailed 3D map ever made of the universe announced that they may have found a major flaw in their understanding of dark energy, the mysterious force driving the universe’s expansion.

Dark energy has been postulated as a stable force in the universe, both in the current era and throughout the history of the universe; But new data suggests that dark energy may be more variable, getting stronger or weaker over time, reversing or even disappearing.

Adam Reiss, an astronomer at Johns Hopkins University and the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, who was not involved in the new study, was quoted by the New York Times as saying, “The new finding may be the first real clue we’ve had in 25 years about the nature of dark energy.” In 2011, Reiss won the Nobel Prize in Physics along with two other astronomers for the discovery of dark energy.

The recent conclusion, if confirmed, could save astronomers and other scientists from predicting the ultimate fate of the universe. If the dark energy has a constant effect over time, it will eventually push all the stars and galaxies away from each other so much that even the atoms may disintegrate and the universe and all life in it, light, and energy will be destroyed forever. Instead, it appears that dark energy can change course and steer the universe toward a more fruitful future.

Dark energy may become stronger or weaker, reverse or even disappear over time

However, nothing is certain. The new finding has about a 1 in 400 chance of being a statistical coincidence. More precisely, the degree of certainty of a new discovery is three sigma, which is much lower than the gold standard for scientific discoveries called five sigma or one in 1.7 million. In the history of physics, even five-sigma events have been discredited when more data or better interpretations have emerged.

The recent discovery is considered an initial report and has been published as a series of articles by the group responsible for an international project called “Dark Energy Spectroscopy Instrument” or DESI for short. The group has just begun a five-year effort to create a three-dimensional map of the positions and velocities of 40 million galaxies over the 11 billion-year history of the universe. The researchers made their initial map based on the first year of observations of just six million galaxies. The results were presented April 4 at the American Physical Society meeting in Sacramento, California, and at a conference in Italy.

“So far we’re seeing initial consistency with our best model of the universe,” DESI director Michael Levy said in a statement released by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, the center overseeing the project. “But we also see some potentially interesting differences that may indicate the evolution of dark energy over time.”

“The DESI team didn’t expect to find the treasure so soon,” Natalie Palanque-Delaberville, an astrophysicist at Lawrence Berkeley Lab and project spokeswoman, said in an interview. The first year’s results were designed solely to confirm what we already knew. “We thought we would basically approve the standard model.” But the unknowns appeared before the eyes of the researchers.

The researchers’ new map is not fully compatible with the standard model

When the scientists combined their map with other cosmological data, they were surprised to find that it didn’t completely fit the Standard Model. This model assumes that dark energy is stable and unchanging; While variable dark energy fits the new data. However, Dr. Palanque-Delaberville sees the new discovery as an interesting clue that has not yet turned into definitive proof.

University of Chicago astrophysicist Wendy Friedman, who led the scientific effort to measure the expansion of the universe, described the team’s results as “tremendous findings that have the potential to open a new window into understanding dark energy.” As the dominant force in the universe, dark energy remains the greatest mystery in cosmology.

Imaging the passage of quasar light through intergalactic clouds
Artistic rendering of quasar light passing through intergalactic clouds of hydrogen gas. This light provides clues to the structure of the distant universe.
NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/P. Marenfeld and DESI collaboration

The idea of ​​dark energy was proposed in 1998; When two competing groups of astronomers, including Dr. Rees, discovered that the rate of expansion of the universe was increasing rather than decreasing, contrary to what most scientists expected. Early observations seemed to show that dark energy behaved just like the famous ” fudge factor ” denoted by the Greek letter lambda. Albert Einstein included lambda in his equations to explain why the universe does not collapse due to its own gravity; But later he called this action his biggest mistake.

However, Einstein probably judged too soon. Lambda, as formulated by Einstein, was a property of space itself: as the universe expands, the more space there is, the more dark energy there is, which pushes ever harder, eventually leading to an unbridled, lightless future.

Dark energy was placed in the standard model called LCDM, consisting of 70% dark energy (lambda), 25% cold dark matter (a collection of low-speed alien particles), and 5% atomic matter. Although this model has now been discredited by the James Webb Space Telescope , it still holds its validity. However, what if dark energy is not as stable as the cosmological model assumes?

The problem is related to a parameter called w, a special measure for measuring the density or intensity of dark energy. In Einstein’s version of dark energy, the value of this parameter remains constant negative one throughout the life of the universe. Cosmologists have used this value in their models for the past 25 years.

Albert Einstein included lambda in his equations to explain why the universe is collapsing under its own gravity.

But Einstein’s hypothesis of dark energy is only the simplest version. “With the Desi project we now have the precision that allows us to go beyond that simple model to see if the dark energy density is constant over time or if it fluctuates and evolves over time,” says Dr. Palanque-Delabreville.

The Desi project, 14 years in the making, is designed to test the stability of this energy by measuring the expansion rate of the universe at different times in the past. In order to do this, scientists equipped one of the telescopes of the Keith Peak National Observatory in Arizona, USA, with five thousand optical fiber detectors that can perform spectroscopy on a large number of galaxies at the same time to find out how fast they are moving away from Earth.

The researchers used fluctuations in the cosmic distribution of galaxies, known as baryonic acoustic variations , as a measure of distance. The sound waves in the hot plasma accumulated in the universe, when it was only 380,000 years old, carved the oscillations on the universe. At that time, the oscillations were half a million light years across. 13.5 billion years later, the universe has expanded a thousandfold, and the oscillations, now 500 million light-years across, serve as convenient rulers for cosmic measurements.

Desi scientists divided the last 11 billion years of the universe into 7 time periods and measured the size of the fluctuations and the speed of the galaxies in them moving away from us and from each other. When the researchers put all the data together, they found that the assumption that dark energy is constant does not explain the expansion of the universe. Galaxies appeared closer than they should be in the last three periods; An observation that suggests dark energy may be evolving over time.

“We’re actually seeing a clue that the properties of dark energy don’t fit a simple cosmological constant, and instead may have some deviations,” says Dr. Palanque-Delaberville. However, he believes that the new finding is too weak and is not considered proof yet. Time and more data will determine the fate of dark energy and the researchers’ tested model.

Continue Reading

Space

Why the James Webb telescope does not observe the beginning of the universe?

Published

on

By

James Webb telescope

The James Webb Space Telescope is one of the most advanced telescopes ever built. Planning to launch James Webb began more than 25 years ago, and construction efforts took more than a decade. On December 25, 2021, this telescope was launched into space and within a month it reached its final destination, 930,000 miles away from Earth. Its position in space gives it a relatively unobstructed view of the world.

Why the “James Webb” telescope does not observe the beginning of the universe?

The design of this telescope was a global effort led by NASA and aims to push the boundaries of astronomical observation with revolutionary engineering. Its mirror is huge, about 21 feet (6.5 meters) in diameter, which is about three times the size of the Hubble Space Telescope, which was launched in 1990 and is still operating.

According to SF, it’s the telescope’s mirror that allows it to gather light. James Webb is so big that it can see the faintest and most distant galaxies and stars in the universe. Its advanced instruments can reveal information about the composition, temperature, and motion of these distant cosmic bodies.

Astrophysicists constantly look back to see what stars, galaxies, and supermassive black holes looked like when their light began its journey toward Earth, and use this information to better understand their growth and evolution. For the space scientist, the James Webb Space Telescope is a window into that unknown world. How far can James Webb look into the universe and its past? The answer is about 13.5 billion years.

Time travel

A telescope does not show stars, galaxies, and exoplanets as they are. Instead, astrologers have a glimpse of how they were in the past. It takes time for light to travel through space and reach our telescope. In essence, this means that looking into space is also a journey into the past.

This is true even for objects that are quite close to us. The light you see from the sun has left about eight minutes and 20 seconds earlier. This is how long it takes for sunlight to reach the earth.

You can easily do calculations on this. All light, whether it’s sunlight, a flashlight, or a light bulb in your home, travels at a speed of 186,000 miles (approximately 300,000 kilometers) per second. This is more than 11 million miles, which is about 18 million kilometers per minute. The sun is about 93 million miles (150 million kilometers) from the earth. which brings the time of reaching the light to about eight minutes and 20 seconds.

Why the “James Webb” telescope does not observe the moment of the beginning of the universe?

But the farther something is, the longer it takes for its light to reach us. That’s why the light we see from the closest star to us other than the Sun, Proxima Centauri, dates back four years. This star is about 25 trillion miles (about 40 trillion kilometers) from Earth, so it takes a little over four years for its light to reach us.

Recently, James Webb has observed the star Earendel, which is one of the most distant stars ever discovered and the light that James Webb sees is about 12.9 billion years old.

The James Webb Space Telescope travels much further into the past than other telescopes such as the Hubble Space Telescope. For example, although Hubble can see objects 60,000 times fainter than the human eye, James Webb can see objects almost 9 times fainter than even Hubble.

Read more: How can solar storms destroy satellites so easily?

Big Bang

But is it possible to go back to the beginning of time?

Big Bang is the term used to define the beginning of the universe as we know it. Scientists believe that this happened about 13.8 billion years ago. This theory is the most accepted theory among physicists to explain the history of our universe.

However, the name is a bit misleading because it suggests that some kind of explosion, like a firework, created the universe. The Big Bang more accurately represents space that is rapidly expanding everywhere in the universe. The environment immediately after the Big Bang resembled a cosmic fog that covered the universe and made it difficult for light to pass through. Eventually, galaxies, stars, and planets began to grow.

That’s why this period is called the “Cosmic Dark Age” in the world. As the universe continued to expand, the cosmic fog began to lift and light was finally able to travel freely through space. In fact, few satellites have observed the light left over from the Big Bang some 380,000 years after it happened. These telescopes are designed to detect the glow left over from the nebula, whose light can be traced in the microwave band.

However, even 380,000 years after the Big Bang, there were no stars or galaxies. The world was still a very dark place. The cosmic dark ages did not end until several hundred million years later when the first stars and galaxies began to form.

The James Webb Space Telescope was not designed to observe the time to the moment of the Big Bang, but to see the period when the first objects in the universe began to form and emit light.

Before this time period, due to the conditions of the early universe and the lack of galaxies and stars, there was little light for the James Webb Space Telescope to observe.

By studying ancient galaxies, scientists hope to understand the unique conditions of the early universe and gain insight into the processes that helped them flourish. This includes the evolution of supermassive black holes, the life cycles of stars, and what exoplanets are made of.

Continue Reading

Popular