Connect with us

Space

Parker Probe; Touching the sun with the world’s fastest spacecraf

Published

on

Parker Probe
Studying the Sun up close and trying to uncover its secrets has been a long-held dream that has now become a reality thanks to the Parker Solar Probe.

Parker Probe; Touching the sun with the world’s fastest spacecraft

The sun has supported life on planet Earth for billions of years and has helped shape belief systems and legends throughout human history. This most luminous body in the sky is unavoidable and its existence is undeniable except in the rarest terrestrial environments. However, we still don’t really know how the sun works. Here we will talk about the Parker Probe.

The star of our system is much more complicated than it seems. Instead of the fixed and unchanging disk that our eyes see, the Sun is a dynamic and magnetically active star. The Sun’s atmosphere continuously ejects magnetized material that sweeps across the entire Solar System far beyond the orbit of Pluto, affecting all existing worlds along the way.

The long-standing dream of meeting the sun

Astronomers have studied the Sun for over a century. Using ground and space telescopes that are designed to withstand the impressive radiation of the sun’s burning face, they have stared at this star at every wavelength of the electromagnetic spectrum; But no matter how hard scientists have tried, they have not been able to reveal the secrets of the sun. Perhaps this failure is because until recently no telescope had come close enough to the Sun to really study it.

However, the situation changed recently. In the fall of 2021, for the first time in human history, a spacecraft flew into the Sun’s atmosphere and passed through the super-hot particles of the Sun’s corona. This achievement provided scientists with important information, with the help of which we can finally discover the secrets of the closest star to Earth. This daring spacecraft is called Parker Solar Probe.

Parker probe over the sun
Artist’s impression of the Parker probe’s entry into the Sun’s atmosphere.

The spacecraft was named Parker Solar Probe in honor of Eugene Parker, a famous American astrophysicist

For more than 60 years, scientists have dreamed of flying a spacecraft like the Parker Probe. In 1958, the year NASA was founded, the Space Studies Board of the National Academy of Sciences proposed that this newly established organization send a spacecraft into the orbit of the planet Mercury in order to study the environment around the Sun. Over the years, several research groups have presented different ideas for launching a solar probe; But none of the missions could get as close to the Sun as astronomers wanted. It took decades for the technology of heat shields and other elements to come together well and make the long-held dream of scientists a reality.

The original Solar Probe design in the 1990s intended to use Jupiter’s gravitational pull and enter a polar orbit that would send the spacecraft almost directly toward the Sun; But due to problems including the high cost and time of the mission, the plan was changed in the following years. In the early 2010s, the Sun exploration project was transformed into a less expensive project called Solar Probe Plus, and it was decided to use the gravitational assistance of Venus and a more direct flight path to reach the Sun. In May 2017, the spacecraft was renamed Parker Solar Probe in honor of Eugene Parker, a prominent American astrophysicist and the inventor of the term ” solar wind “. This was the first time that NASA put the name of a living person on one of its spacecraft. Finally, after decades of waiting for scientists, the Khurshid spacecraft was launched on August 12, 2018 (21 August 2018) and began its 7-year mission.

The mysterious star

The Sun’s atmosphere is made up of different layers just like the atmosphere of our planet. The Earth’s atmosphere has three layers, the troposphere, stratosphere, and mesosphere respectively, and the layers of the Sun’s atmosphere are the photosphere, chromosphere, and corona (sun’s crown). The surface of the Sun is often thought to be hotter than other parts, But the photosphere or the surface of the sun is actually not that hot. The temperature in this layer ranges from nearly 6200 degrees Celsius in the lower part to 3700 degrees Celsius in the upper part. This temperature is almost equal to the heat of electric arc welding. It is interesting to know that the air around a lightning strike can be up to five times hotter than the photosphere.

The strange thing is that the corona, as the outermost layer of the Sun’s atmosphere, is much hotter than the photosphere. The temperature of the corona, which starts approximately 2,100 km above the surface of the sun, reaches half a million to several million degrees Celsius, or at least 80 times the surface temperature. It’s like moving away from a fire, and the further you move away from it, the hotter you get. This unusual feature is what makes the achievement of the Parker Solar Probe even more impressive.

Parker Solar Probe
Parker solar probe in clean room. The heat shield of the spacecraft with its white ceramic coating can be seen at the top.

Why the Sun’s corona is much hotter than the Sun’s surface is one of the unsolved mysteries of the universe, and it is the task of the Parker Solar Probe to unravel it. As a result, the probe has the task of collecting information from the magnetic fields and charged particles of the solar corona and trying to answer this puzzle.

Overall, the scientific goals of the Parker probe are to determine the mechanisms that generate the fast and slow solar winds, the heating of the sun’s corona, and the transport of energetic particles. In order to achieve these goals, the probe must approach the Sun less than 10 solar radii from the center of the Sun (the radius of the Sun is 695,500 km) and spend at least 14 hours below 10 solar radii and at least 950 hours below 20 solar radii to make in situ measurements. spend Flying around the Sun, compared to other space missions whose destination is a planet, asteroid, or comet, presents unprecedented technical challenges to the spacecraft, which we will mention below.

Technical challenges of the Parker probe

Parker probe travels faster than any other spacecraft; So that in its last trip around the sun, it will fly over its surface at an incredible speed of 690,000 kilometers per hour. This speed is so high that the distance between Tehran and Kermanshah can be covered in less than three seconds. However, the first big problem facing Parker was actually getting to the sun. Although the sun’s gravity acts as an anchor for the entire solar system, it is not easy to approach.

To get a satellite out of orbit around the Earth, we need to reduce its angular momentum so that it falls towards the planet. This is what we have to do when trying to remove an object from orbit around the Sun; With the difference that in this case, we are at a distance of one astronomical unit or 150 million kilometers from the sun and we are moving at a speed of 30 kilometers per second.

Parker’s first big problem was getting to the sun

Any object that is launched from the earth will enter the path around the sun with the same orbital speed; This means that in order to achieve a shorter orbit around the sun, we must reduce the orbital speed of the spacecraft around the sun. Decelerating the spacecraft is an extremely energy-consuming operation; Especially when you add in the energy required to escape Earth’s gravity. So let’s assume that we first want to get our satellite from the surface of the earth to the orbit around the earth. This requires moving the satellite up to a speed of 9.2 km/s relative to the earth’s surface. Then, the satellite is placed in orbit around the Earth and moves around the Sun at a speed of 30 km/s.

After placing the satellite in the earth’s orbit, we have to perform an orbital maneuver called “Hohmann transfer”. By performing this maneuver, we change the spacecraft’s orbital energy to correct its perigee (closest distance to the Sun) or apogee (farthest distance from the Sun). To meet an outer planet like Mars, we need to increase the solar apogee by adding to the orbital energy of the spacecraft; While reaching an inner planet like Venus requires reducing the solar perigee by reducing the orbital energy. To reach Mars and Venus from Earth’s orbit, we need a delta way (change in velocity) of approximately 2.9 km/s and 2.5 km/s respectively. These values ​​are obtained using the following equation:

Delta V calculation formula

In the equation, the Greek letter mo, similar to the English u, is called the Sun’s planetary parameter, which is the product of the Sun’s mass. R 1 is the orbital radius of the mass from which we start moving. In this case, the distance of 150 million kilometers from the Earth to the sun is considered the orbital radius, and finally, R 2 is the perigee or zenith. If we calculate the DeltaV required for the Parker Solar Probe to reach its closest distance to the Sun (6.2 million km), we will arrive at a number of 21.4 km/s, which is more than 8.5 times the DeltaV needed to reach Venus.

The obtained Delta V number is considered extremely high and exceeds the capability of all rockets built so far. But four years ago, the Parker Solar Probe launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida atop the Delta 4 Heavy, the world’s second most powerful rocket after SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy. In order to give the probe additional thrust, Delta 4 was equipped with a special solid-fuel third stage, which provided an additional three kilometers per second delta velocity for the normally two-stage rocket.

However, even with this extra power, the probe could never get close to the Sun. In order to make his record-breaking flight, which was one-seventh of the record of Helios 2, NASA’s previous solar probe, Parker was assisted by the gravity of the planet Venus in an amazing way five times, and he is going to make two more flybys of this planet in 2023 and 2024.

The path of the Parker probe. The spacecraft shortens its orbit around the Sun with each Venus flyby.

Since Venus is a relatively low-mass planet, Parker needed this number of flybys. The amount of speed a planet can change is largely determined by its gravity, which in turn is determined by the planet’s mass. As mentioned earlier, Parker’s original plan was to get a gravitational boost from Jupiter that would bring the probe three times closer to the Sun; But this path was accompanied by some problems.

Since Jupiter’s orbit is very far from the Sun, the sunlight reaching the solar panels at the peak of Parker’s orbit was reduced by 25 times, and therefore the spacecraft needed much larger panels to provide its energy. This became problematic as the spacecraft orbited Jupiter and began accelerating toward the Sun. In this situation, the panels would be destroyed by the sun’s heat and could not be folded and hidden behind the solar shield.

Other options were available. The Parker builders could have used a radioisotope thermal generator; But this would dramatically increase the cost, weight, and complexity of the spacecraft. The real strength of Parker’s new and different flight path is getting more time and data to help scientists meet the rover’s mission goal of studying the Sun.

With the original plan to fly around Jupiter, the probe had only 100 hours of time in the target region around the Sun, and could only fly past the Sun twice before reaching the end of its eight-year mission. The new shorter path means that Parker Solar Probe will take less than 150 days to complete an orbit around the Sun, allowing scientists to collect more than 900 hours of data during the probe’s 24 orbits.

The main instruments of the spacecraft

Heat Shield

The change in the program was accompanied by a change in design, abandoning the original cone-shaped heat shield and using the flat, compact, and familiar shield used in other spacecraft. This shield is made of carbon foam with a thickness of 11.4 cm; A truly amazing material that is the product of one of the most capable material innovation labs called Ultramet. Under the scanning electron microscope, this carbon foam appears to be an extremely porous material with 97% of its internal volume being empty space, thus providing amazing insulation properties for the heat shield while benefiting from the thermal stability of carbon.

Parker’s heat shield is made of carbon-carbon composite and is exposed to temperatures of approximately 1400 degrees Celsius.

The next material is carbon-carbon composite, which is made by combining graphite with an organic binder such as bitumen or epoxy resin. This compound was applied to each side of the foam before being superheated and converting the glue into a pure form of carbon, creating a carbon-carbon composite. Finally, ceramic white was used to paint the sun-facing side of the shield to reflect the heat more.

But if the temperature of the Sun’s corona is at least half a million degrees Celsius, how can the probe enter it without melting? Although the Sun’s outermost layer is incredibly hot, it has a very low density. As a comparison, think of the difference between putting your hand in the oven and a pot of boiling water. (Don’t do this at home!) Hands can withstand much higher temperatures in the oven for longer than boiling water; Because they have to face many more particles in the pot of water.

Similarly, the Sun’s corona is less dense than the visible surface of the Sun; As a result, the spacecraft encounters less hot particles. In fact, while Parker is moving in an environment with a temperature of several million degrees Celsius, the heat shield facing the sun of the spacecraft only heats up to approximately 1400 degrees Celsius.

Read More: The Voyager Twins

Solar Probe Cup (SPC)

Other parts of the spacecraft, plus some specialized sensors and solar panels, had to be designed to fit under the shield’s shadow. But there are various tools that bravely step out from under the shadow of the heat shield; Like the cup of the solar probe, which is one of several sensors on board the spacecraft. This piece is undoubtedly Parker’s most impressive piece of technology, completely outside the scope of the sun shield’s protection; As a result, designers had to be very creative in using materials.

The Parker Solar Probe cup is a Faraday cup and part of the Solar Wind Survey Instrument (SWEAP); A device that can count and measure the properties of electrons and ions radiated from the sun and actually gives the spacecraft the ability to study the solar wind and objects ejected from the sun’s crown. This device basically works by applying an electric field to the grid placed in the mouth of the cup. By changing the voltage, it is possible to select or filter the particles that are able to enter the cup, and at the same time as the charged particles hit the collector plate at the bottom of the cup, more information can be obtained about the cause of the current. In practice, the cup is a very simple device; But facing temperatures of 1,400 degrees Celsius, which is just below the melting point of pure iron, the solar probe cup required some engineering innovations.

Solar Probe Cup (SPC)
Solar Probe Cup (SPC).

The first challenge was to choose a material for the electric grid that would create a selective electric field at the entrance of the cup. In addition to conductivity and resistance to heat, this network must also be machinable to make a spaced network on the scale of one hundred microns. For this purpose, the makers used tungsten; The same material used here on Earth in incandescent light bulbs. Thanks to tungsten, the lamps can survive the very high temperatures required to produce light. Tungsten filaments operate at a temperature of three thousand degrees Celsius; As a result, they are very durable against extreme temperatures. However, machining tungsten in a very fine mesh is difficult.

Micron-scale machining is not possible with traditional tools. By using these tools, as soon as the necessary force is applied to shave the metal, the mesh breaks. Instead, in such cases, lasers are usually used for engraving on materials; But since tungsten is very resistant to heat, the laser will not be able to melt it to form a network. Instead, the makers used acid printing.

Next, cables were needed that could supply the main power and carry the electrical signals away from the collector plate. Copper and aluminum, two common conductors on Earth, will be transformed into a pool of molten metal at the Parker Solar Probe position; As a result, they could not be used in any way. Each conductive cable in this part of the spacecraft must be made of niobium C-103, a special alloy consisting of 89 percent niobium, 10 percent hafnium, and 1 percent titanium. This strange aerospace material has also been used in the construction of all the components of the outer cover. Normally the wires are insulated with plastic outer coverings, But obviously, this option was not possible for the Parker space probe and the engineers had to use sapphire to ensure the insulation of the niobium wires.

To accomplish what is a relatively mundane task on Earth, Parker’s builders were forced to use strange materials. Other parts of the sensors beyond the solar shield are constructed in a similar manner. Magnetic field measuring instruments hidden behind the shield require antennas that extend beyond the solar shield to make measurements of the Sun’s magnetic field. These four antennas are also made of Niobium C-103.

Solar Panels

Solar panels were the next challenge. While orbiting the sun in its distant orbit, the spacecraft can fully open its solar panels without any problems; But as the probe begins its rapid return to the Sun, heat will become an increasing problem. By collecting solar panels, this problem can be partially dealt with; But the spacecraft must maintain some power to launch its scientific equipment during this important phase of the flight.

Parker has two smaller secondary panels that face the sun and are water cooled. This water is inside the solar panels and black radiators that are like titanium trusses right under the solar shield. It is pumped. This truss is very light despite its large size. The whole truss weighs only 22.7 kg, which considering the size of the structure, is very low weight even for titanium as a metal with low density. By performing detailed stress calculations, NASA engineers have ensured that the truss can use as little material as possible. This, of course, saves the launch weight; But the materials available to transfer heat from the heat shield to the bus (main body) of the spacecraft have also been minimized.

Edilo solar furnace
Edilo solar furnace in France.

It is difficult to test systems on the ground in the heat they are expected to encounter. The Edilo Solar Furnace is the most similar location to the environment that the Parker Probe systems will have to endure. Built on a mountainside in southern France, the facility uses ten thousand adjustable mirrors to focus light onto a concave mirror. Edilo solar furnace has the ability to reach a temperature of 3500 degrees Celsius; More than twice the temperature that Parker’s solar shield will experience.

Parts such as the Faraday cup and the solar shield were placed at the focal point of the concave mirror of the furnace and exposed to the temperatures that they must withstand when exposed to the sun. However, a piece like Faraday’s cup had to be tested while performing its sensory functions. To that end, the engineers needed a particle accelerator to simulate the electrons and ions from the solar wind that the cup would encounter. It was not possible to combine the particle accelerator with the solar furnace; As a result, researchers from the University of Michigan proposed the smart idea of ​​using four high-power IMAX projectors to simulate the sun’s heat. They also found that the Faraday cup actually performed better when heated; Because heat cleans the system from pollutants.

Much of the information obtained from the Faraday Cup is of little interest to the casual space enthusiast. They are the raw data that provide scientists with valuable clues about the nature of the Sun. However, one of the sensors on the spacecraft, which is in charge of transmitting images to the ground, can surprise us.

Wide Field Camera for Solar Probe (WISPR)

During a solar eclipse, we can observe a beautiful phenomenon: bright rings of light that appear around the sun. These extraordinary patterns are the result of bright electrons that move around the Sun on magnetic field lines and have been deformed by the pressure of the solar wind. We have been able to observe streams of energetic electrons from our Earth and solar observatories located at Lagrangian point 1, But we never managed to see them up close until recently.

After completing its final orbit and completing its mission, Parker will evaporate into the Sun’s atmosphere

As the Parker Solar Probe entered the corona on its ninth encounter with the Sun, it began capturing images of the surrounding space with its Wide Field Imager (WISPR), an array of optical telescopes. The images sent back to Earth are like a traveler’s view of a blizzard passing through on a dark night: glowing sub-particles streaming past as the probe plunges into the eye of the storm. These beautiful images will undoubtedly provide scientists with unique data about the nature of the sub-particles flowing in the Sun’s corona.

The path ahead of the Parker probe

The next close encounter of the Parker Solar Probe will take place on June 11, 1401, and the spacecraft will circle the Sun another 15 times for a total of 24 times in the next three years. With two more flybys of Venus in 2024 and 2025, Parker will break his records and get much closer to the Sun. On the last visit, the probe will reach a distance of 16.6 million kilometers from the Sun, which is almost seven times closer than any other spacecraft.

After completing the 24th orbit, the probe may have some fuel to continue orbiting the Sun; But Parker ultimately fails to ignite the thrusters necessary to keep his heat shield facing the Sun. The probe will then begin to rotate, and parts of the spacecraft not designed to see the sun will be exposed to full radiation.

The spacecraft will first break into large pieces and then become smaller and smaller. In the end, the entire probe, which is about the size of a small car, will be left with nothing more than tiny dust scattered across the Sun’s corona. However, Parker’s legacy will live on. The probe’s observations are expected to finally help solve questions that have been puzzling scientists for decades.

Space

History of the world; From the Big Bang to the creation of the planet Earth

Published

on

By

History of the world
The universe started from a singularity and continues to expand until today, 13.8 billion years old. in this article we’re going to examine the history of the world.

History of the world; From the Big Bang to the creation of the planet Earth

Since its launch in 2021, the James Webb Space Telescope has sent us spectacular images of the universe’s deep field. This telescope revealed fine details like a galaxy with an age of 13.1 billion. Such distant objects may not be visually impressive, appearing as fuzzy red blobs in images, but they can provide a fascinating glimpse into the universe’s infancy.

Space and time are intertwined. Light travels at a constant speed, so the images captured by telescopes like James Webb’s are actually images of the universe from millions or even billions of years ago. The higher the sensitivity and accuracy of a telescope, the more distant objects it can observe and thus display more distant times. As the most powerful telescope ever launched, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is extremely sensitive. This telescope can theoretically see objects within 100 million years since the formation of the universe.

Table of Contents
  • The first moments
  • Initial plasma
  • The world becomes transparent
  • Cosmic Dark Age
  • The first habitable age
  • The first lights in the dark
  • Blooming cosmos with stars
  • Star seeds
  • The oldest known star
  • The oldest known planet
  • The formation of galaxies
  • Large-scale structures of the universe
  • Collision of galaxies
  • Massive black holes
  • The formation of the Milky Way disc
  • Overcoming dark energy
  • The birth of the sun
  • The formation of the earth
  • The first forms of life
  • Extraterrestrial life and alien civilizations

There are still many unknowns about the history of the universe, but telescopes like Webb’s can unravel these mysteries and reveal unprecedented detail.

History of the world

The first moments

The first moments of the worldThe universe was born about 13.8 billion years ago from the Big Bang.

The entire universe was created from an ancient and vast explosion that continues to this day. This spark , called the Big Bang, happened nearly 13.8 billion years ago. The Big Bang is the best hypothesis ever proposed for the existence of the universe. Although there is still no way to directly observe the Big Bang, this theory is well established and has been confirmed by many scientists over the past few decades.

In the first moments of the universe, a fraction of a second after the Big Bang, everything was inside a singularity, which is an infinitesimally small point of space with a very strange and high density that encompasses everything. In a few moments after the birth of the universe, the world was in an era known as Planck’s age. In this era, the whole world was so small that space and time had no meaning. Then, in less than a second, the universe entered a phase known as cosmic inflation, and for a moment, it expanded greatly. The infant universe consisted of a hot soup of subatomic particles and radiation, preventing any kind of structure from forming.

Initial plasma

The beginning plasma of the worldThe universe was initially filled with turbid, hot plasma.

The early universe was a highly viscous place filled with turbid plasma for several thousand years. This murky plasma was a mass of subatomic particles that were too hot to contract into atoms. The lack of transparency of the early world makes it impossible to see the events of that time; However, the early chapters of the universe’s history are of interest to many cosmologists because they represent a stage for the existence of everything.

Scientists believe that the early universe was filled with equal amounts of matter and antimatter, which eventually annihilated each other, leaving only a small amount of matter in the present universe. The question of why one of them was more remains a mystery and physicists are still trying to answer this question.

Eventually, the universe cooled and atoms and then strange molecules began to form. The first molecule that was formed in the world was made of only two elements, hydrogen and helium. These molecules finally made a compound called helium hydride. This chemical reaction actually created a helium compound that looks like it shouldn’t exist.

The world becomes transparent

Transparency map of the universeThe world became transparent after 300 thousand years.

On its 300,000 birthday, the world entered an era known as the age of recombination. It was during this period that atoms began to form, although the word “recombination” is a bit of a misnomer because it was during this period that everything was combined together for the first time. As the universe cooled enough, matter began to form atoms, and the universe became transparent for the first time. This transparency allowed the light left over from the Big Bang to spread throughout the universe.

The ancient Big Bang radiation marks the edge of the visible universe and can still be observed. As the universe continues to expand, the light in it is stretched, which astronomers witness in the form of the redshift phenomenon. The older the light of an object, the more it is stretched and moves to the red side of the spectrum like infrared and finally to longer wavelengths.

The initial light of the birth of the world is the most stretched light and the human eye cannot observe it. This light can be seen in all directions today as the cosmic background radiation (CMB). As seen in the image above, some speckled areas show slight fluctuations left over from cosmic inflation. These faint background rays are the last reflections of the birth of the universe.

Cosmic Dark Age

darkness of the universeThe world had no stars in the dark ages.

With the universe filled with atoms, light was finally able to move freely in open space. However, there was nothing in the universe capable of producing light. In fact, this age of the world is known as the age of cosmic darkness. In this period, the stars were not yet born and the space was full of silence and infinite darkness. The universe was in its infancy and there was nothing but dark matter with neutral helium and hydrogen, But it was in this darkness that the materials of the world gradually joined each other.

Finally, with the formation of the first stars, the world entered an era known as the Bazion, and the first stars shone. They emitted intense ultraviolet light in the dark and eventually removed the electrons from the new atoms; But even though the stars were shining for the first time in the universe, their light could not travel very far. Because the entire space was filled with a fog of hydrogen gas and blocked the light of the first stars. After some time, the starlight traveled further distances and reached us today.

The first habitable age

Early habitable ageAccording to calculations, the first habitable age started in 10-17 million years of the world.

According to human earth standards, any place with liquid water can be classified as habitable. As the early Earth cooled, the surprising truth was revealed that the entire universe was once at a habitable temperature. According to an article published in the International Journal of Astrophysics, this period is called the early habitable age. Based on this hypothesis, the question arises as to what exactly happened in a world where life theoretically existed everywhere. According to calculations, this cosmic age corresponds to the time when the universe was still 10 to 17 million years old.

Of course, scientists have differences in this hypothesis. According to an article in Nature that argues against this idea, life requires a hot-to-cold energy flow and cannot exist in a uniformly warm universe. Furthermore, at this early age it is not known whether the universe had stars or planets, or even oxygen to produce water. However, this hypothesis cannot be completely rejected. The first planets were probably formed in the first few billion years of the universe; So the hypothesis of an early habitable age is little more than a fascinating thought experiment.

History of the world

The first lights in the dark

The first lights of the worldThe first stars of the universe were composed of light elements.

The first stars of the universe were formed from the virgin material left over from the Big Bang and were the cause of the formation of the first heavy elements of the universe. These stars, which lacked elements heavier than helium, are known as population 3 stars (confusingly named stellar populations in the wrong order). Since these stars were responsible for the formation of the heavy elements of the universe, they must have existed at some point in history. These objects are expected to have formed between 100 million and 250 million years after the Big Bang.

According to the models, Population 3 stars were very massive and short-lived by today’s stellar standards. The lifetime of some of these stars reached only 2 million years, which is a long time from the human point of view; But on a stellar scale, it’s like a blink of an eye. When these stars ended their lives, they likely perished in unstable binary supernova explosions, the most violent type of stellar explosion in the universe. Although no stars belonging to this group have been observed so far, perhaps this trend will change with powerful instruments such as the James Webb Space Telescope.

Blooming cosmos with stars

The formation of starsSome stars of the Milky Way date back to 11 to 13 billion years ago.

We live in a season of the world known as the age of star formation. This age is the beginning of the stars shining in the dark and is actually the modern age of the world, in which the cosmic matter turns into stars, planets and galaxies. According to scientists, the era of star formation began approximately one million years after the Big Bang and will continue until the universe is 100 trillion years old. Until the very distant future, the birth, life and death of stars in the universe and the fusion of hydrogen into heavier elements will continue until hydrogen disappears completely.

Although stars are actively forming in the universe, there is a wide range from newly born stars to very old stars. Stars can live for billions of years. Red dwarfs, the smallest and most populous stars in the universe, live so long that their deaths have not been recorded until now because the universe is not old enough. Astronomers have also observed very old stars in the universe, some of which date back to the earliest days of the Milky Way, between 11 and 13 billion years ago. Stars like this have been observed for most of the history of the universe.

Star seeds

A star nebulaNebulae are breeding grounds for the formation of new stars

By weight, most of Earth is made up of chemical elements heavier than helium, which are made in the cores of stars. This process is known as nucleation. During the lifetime of a star, nuclear reactions combine light elements and produce heavier elements. In this way, elements such as carbon, oxygen, silicon, sulfur and iron are formed in the hearts of stars. When stars run out of fuel, they throw the elements they made back into the universe.

Stars fill the galaxy with elements by their birth and death over billions of years. Carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen are among the most abundant elements made by smaller stars. As these stars die, their outer layers form a stellar nebula. From this example, we can refer to the Southern Ring Nebula, whose image was published by the James Webb telescope.

The life of the biggest stars also ends in a supernova explosion. These explosions not only fill galaxies with heavy elements such as iron, but their shock waves can be the basis for the birth of new stars.

History of the world

The oldest star in the worldThe oldest star in the universe was formed only 100 million years after the Big Bang

The hunt for the oldest stars in the universe is one of the fascinating fields of astronomy that can help scientists understand the early days of the universe. The oldest star ever discovered is HD 140283. The star is so old that the first estimates of its age are older than the universe itself. However, this effect is an illusion caused by the uncertainty in the estimates. Therefore, measuring the age of a star is not an easy task.

According to another research in the Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, the age of HD 140283 was estimated to be almost the same as the age of the universe, i.e. 13.7 billion years. In other words, this star was probably born a hundred million years after the Big Bang, and thus it is one of the first generation of stars that were born in the world. This star is metal-poor, or in other words, has a small number of chemical elements heavier than helium, and thus it is placed in the category of population 2 stars. Such stars are among the oldest objects that have ever shone in the universe. Based on the ratio of chemical elements, these stars are survivors of early stars from the early days of the universe.

The oldest known planet

The oldest planet in the worldThe oldest planet in the world is nearly 12.7 billion years old.

No one knows exactly when the first planets formed, but they seem to be able to outlive stars. The oldest known planet orbits two dead stars, one of which is a pulsar and the other a white dwarf. Both stars are stellar wrecks that have run out of fuel and have released much of their chemical material into their galaxy. The mentioned pulsar is called PSR B1620 and the planet located in its orbit is known by the nickname Methuselah. This planet, which is a kind of gas giant, is not unlike the planet Jupiter.

According to estimates, the lifespan of Methuselah reaches 12.7 billion years, but this age is not exact. There is no good way to estimate the age of planets, so this estimate is based on other stars in the Methuselah cluster. Globular clusters, such as the Methuselah host cluster, are full of stars that formed at the same time.

According to the research of Science magazine, the existence of the ancient planet Methuselah offers interesting hints about the time of formation of the oldest planets. If the estimates are correct and Methuselah is really 12.7 billion years old, we can say that the planets were formed earlier than we think. In other words, Methuselah may not be the only ancient planet in our galaxy.

The formation of galaxies

The formation of galaxiesGalaxies usually come together in several clusters

When the universe was only 200 million years old, the first galaxies were formed. The discovery initially surprised astronomers because they thought galaxies formed much later. Early galaxies were not similar to today’s massive galaxies. Rather, they were shapeless clouds of irregular gas and dust. These galaxies, accompanied by a wave of star birth, eventually became the massive galaxies that fill the universe today. It seems that the Milky Way galaxy was formed approximately 13.6 billion years ago. Our galaxy was then an unrecognizable mass of stars, not unlike the present spiral.

The oldest galaxy ever discovered was formed 300 million years after the Big Bang. This galaxy is called HD1 and the James Webb telescope played an important role in determining its age. HD1, if confirmed, would be the oldest galaxy ever seen by astronomers and could offer fascinating insights into the formation of the universe’s first galaxies. The formation of galaxies is still a mysterious research field full of unanswered questions. Helping to solve these questions will be one of the main goals of the James Webb telescope.

Large-scale structures of the universe

The large-scale structure of the universeGalaxies are held together by gravity and form large-scale cosmic structures

Much of the world seems to be an empty void, But the universe has complex structures on very large scales. The universe is covered with an array of dark matter filaments that form a web-like structure. This network of dark matter, called large-scale structure, shapes the universe and causes galaxies to fall into regular patterns. The gravity of the large-scale structure causes both dark and visible matter to lie next to each other. By examining this structure, we can find signs of the youth of the world.

Deep background images, such as the James Webb Telescope image, can reveal how galaxies fit together. These structures are actually the largest visible structures or galaxy strings in the universe, held together by gravity. In addition, the structures are not random but have an order that still fascinates researchers. Galaxies and large galaxy clusters appear to be evenly spaced in the galactic strings, resembling a pearl necklace. There are still many uncertainties about large-scale structures.

Collision of galaxies

Collision of galaxiesSome galaxies collide and form larger galaxies.

Gravity pulls everything in the universe together, and the heavier the mass, the greater this attraction. Galaxies are among the heaviest objects in the universe, whose formation and evolution are still a matter of discussion and their evolution is strongly influenced by their interaction with each other.

Galaxies usually tend to form groups or clusters that come together due to gravity and start interacting when they are close to each other. The gravitational pull of galaxies leads to the creation of lethal forces. In the most dramatic examples, galaxies can collide and their merger may take billions of years.

Galactic collisions can lead to the formation of new stars; Because the change of gravitational forces causes disturbances on huge scales. Some stars are ejected into the dark intergalactic space, while others are trapped by the gravity of supermassive black holes at the center of colliding galaxies. As the galaxies merge, their spiral arms are eventually destroyed, and the two galaxies eventually become one massive elliptical galaxy. In this way, some of the largest galaxies in the universe are formed. Some galaxies also grow by absorbing smaller galaxies. According to some evidence, the Milky Way has experienced such a collision in the past, and its signs can be seen in the form of remnants of galaxies that it has absorbed in the past.

History of the world

Massive black holes

QuasarQuasars are caused by the feeding of the black hole from the surrounding matter.

The largest galaxies, such as the Milky Way, have a supermassive black hole at their center; Although how these black holes formed is still a mystery, it is clear that they are very old. The European Space Agency has released an image of an ancient galaxy known as UDFj-39546284, which appears to be a small red dot in the image. This spot is actually the oldest quasar observed by astronomers and dates back to 380 million years after the Big Bang.

Quasars are among the brightest objects in the world, which are created by the feeding of the supermassive black hole at the center of a galaxy from the surrounding material. The big question here is how these black holes have reached these dimensions at a high speed. According to a study published in the journal Nature, supermassive black holes appear to have formed suddenly from turbulent cold gas in the early universe. In the right conditions, black holes were formed with great intensity and suddenly as a result of the collapse of streams of initial materials grew to dimensions exceeding 40,000 times the mass of the Sun.

The formation of the Milky Way disc

milky way discIn the first 3 billion years of its existence, the Milky Way had no spiral arm.

Today, the Milky Way is a spiral galaxy, but it hasn’t always been this way. The spiral galaxy formed in a galactic disk, but the Milky Way disk formed about ten billion years ago. This means that our galaxy spent its first three billion years without a disk and therefore had no spiral arm.

The disk of a spiral galaxy contains a large part of the material of that galaxy. In such galaxies, star birth often occurs in spiral arms, as stars are formed from vast clouds of gas and dust slowly swirling around the galactic core. How and why spiral arms and disks are formed is still not completely clear, although this phenomenon has been observed frequently in the sky.

Some galactic disks appear to be very old. The oldest galactic disk ever seen is the Wolf disk. This old spiral galaxy dates back to when the universe was only 1.5 billion years old. Of course, due to the distance of this galaxy, we have no information about its new appearance.

Overcoming dark energy

Dark energyMysterious dark energy is responsible for accelerating the expansion of the universe.

One of the milestones in world history can be related to dark energy; The mysterious force that controls the expansion of the universe. No one knows exactly what dark energy is, although astronomers can measure its effects. Until a long time ago, the universe was in a tug-of-war between the force of gravity and the repulsive force of dark energy. At some point around 5-6 billion years ago, dark energy won the race. As the universe continued to expand, dark energy overcame gravity and accelerated the expansion of the universe.

The effect of dark energy on the future of the universe is still unclear. Without knowing more about dark energy or how it works, there’s no way to know. Although dark energy appears to make up a large part of the universe, its specifics are still shrouded in mystery. According to a possibility, this energy can be one of the inherent characteristics of space itself.

The birth of the sun

The birth of the sunThe sun was formed about 4.6 billion years ago from a cloud of gas and dust.

The sun is almost a third of the entire universe. This star was formed about 4.6 billion years ago. With the formation of the sun, the clouds of gas and dust around it formed planets such as Earth and many moons of the solar system.

The sun is one of the population’s 1 stars. Such stars are among the newest stars in the universe and are rich in heavy elements, examples of which can be found on Earth. According to a hypothesis, the shock wave resulting from a supernova was the cause of the formation of the solar system from vast dust clouds. The traces of this supernova exist in the form of radioactive isotopes in the entire solar system; So a star died so we could live.

The formation of the earth

The formation of the earthEarth was formed from the joining of asteroids.

According to scientists, the story of the formation of the earth goes back to 4.6 billion years ago. Our planet formed in a disk-like cloud of gas and dust around the primordial Sun. Inside this disk, gas and dust particles of different sizes were rotating at different speeds in the orbit of the sun and in this way, they collided and stuck to each other. Finally, the tiny particles turned into huge rock fragments and objects called asteroids, whose diameters ranged from one to hundreds of kilometers.

Asteroids eventually gained enough gravity to clear their orbits and attract other bodies through collisions, becoming larger bodies several thousand kilometers in diameter and forming planets.

Single cell lifeThe first life on earth dates back to 3.7 billion years ago.

Life on Earth is the only life we ​​know of in the entire universe. Life first appeared about 3.7 billion years ago, shortly after the formation of the Earth itself. Thus known life is roughly a quarter of the age of the universe, although the complex life that would eventually become humans is much more recent.

Carbon is an essential element for life and appears to have been unavailable until 1.5 billion years after the Big Bang. For this reason, it is still not possible to estimate with certainty the first form of life in the entire universe. Maybe other parts of the world have different chemistry or different elements than life on Earth.

Extraterrestrial life and alien civilizations

planet EarthLife in other parts of the world may be chemically different from life on Earth.

To quote the late astronomer Carl Sagan, “We are a way of knowing the world.” Humans are part of the world like the most distant stars or galaxies. In other words, at least a part of the world is capable of thinking and observing other parts. The oldest early humans appeared on earth approximately 2.4 million years ago; This means that humans and our direct ancestors only existed in 0.02% of the entire history of the world. On a cosmic scale, it seems like we were born just yesterday. However, humans may not be the only civilization in the world.

The question about the existence of other civilizations in the galaxy has a long history. Half of all Sun-like stars could host habitable universes; Therefore, there is no shortage for the formation of civilizations. According to a relatively conservative study, there should be at least 36 space civilizations capable of communicating in the Milky Way. According to another research, there are more than 42 thousand civilizations in the Milky Way. Currently, there is no way to find out the existence of these civilizations. With more accurate telescopes, we may be able to find evidence that we are not alone in this infinite universe.

Continue Reading

Space

A mystery that is solved by the China’s Chang’e-6 probe!

Published

on

By

Chinese explorer

China’s Chang’e-6 probe, launched to retrieve samples from the far side of the moon, has a big mystery to solve about Earth’s moon.

A mystery that is solved by the China’s Chang’e-6 probe!

China’s Chang’e-6 mission, which is currently on its way to bring back samples from the far side of the moon, will help investigate theories about why the far and near sides of the moon differ.

According to Space, Changi 6 is expected to land in early June in the Apollo impact basin, which is located within the larger South Pole–Aitken basin.

The Aitken Antarctic Basin is the largest collisional feature of its kind in the solar system, with an area of 2,400 x 2,050 km. This basin was formed about 4.3 billion years ago, which is very early in the history of the solar system.

Although the Apollo Basin is younger, it is the largest impact site within the Aitken Antarctic Basin. Apollo has a two-ring structure, the inner ring consists of mountain peaks with a diameter of 247 km, and the outer ring is about 492 km wide.

The Chang’e-6 mission was launched on May 3 from the Wenchang Satellite Launch Center in Hainan Province, located in southern China, and went to the moon on a Long March 5 rocket.

As the first mission to bring samples from the far side of the moon, Changi 6 is supposed to bring back about two kilograms of precious lunar material. The far side of the moon is a relatively unknown place. The fact that we can’t see the far side of the moon from Earth adds to its mystery. For the first time, the Soviet Union’s “Luna 3” spacecraft photographed the far side of the moon in 1959.

With that photo, scientists around the world were amazed to see how different the far side of the moon is from the side we are familiar with. Although both the far and near sides have many craters, the near side also contains vast volcanic plains called “lunar maria” that cover about 31% of it.

The far side of the moon is opposite and volcanic plains cover only about 1% of it.

So how did the far side and the near side become so different? It seems that the thickness of the shell is one of the factors. In fact, NASA’s GRAIL mission found in 2011 that the far-side crust is on average 20 kilometers thicker than the near-side crust.

The reason for this is thought to be that our moon was formed from debris from the impact of a Mars-sized planet on Earth about 4.5 billion years ago. As the Moon formed from that debris, it became tidally locked. This means that it always shows the face of our planet.

The surface of the earth was completely melted by that big impact and it radiated heat towards the near side of the moon and kept itself molten for a longer time. Scientists believe that the rock vaporizes on the near side and condenses on the colder side, thickening the crust on the far side.

Hong Kong University (HKU) researcher Yuqi Qian is one of the lead researchers on a new project that shows that a sample to be returned to Earth by Chang’e 6 could test this theory. Keyan said: Basic findings show that the difference in crustal thickness between the near and far sides may be the main cause of the difference in the moon’s volcanism.

In places like most distant parts where the Moon’s crust is thick, magma can’t seep through fractures to the surface. In areas such as the near side where the crust is thin, fractures can allow magma to seep in and lead to lava eruptions.

The Aitken and Apollo Antarctic Basins, despite both being on the far side of the Moon, create contradictions. That’s because they’ve gouged deeply into the Moon’s crust, and at the base of these giant impact sites, the crust is thinner than elsewhere on the far side. Volcanic plains also exist within these basins, but only five percent of their area is covered by basalt lava. This limited amount of volcanism seems to contradict the conventional idea that crustal thickness dictates volcanic activity. This creates a paradox in lunar science that has been known for a long time.

An alternative possibility suggests that the near side could contain more radioactive elements than the far side. These elements may have generated heat and led to the melting of the lower mantle. As a result, much more magma has formed and a thinner crust has formed on the near side. Hence, the volcano is more in this area.

However, by landing on one of the few volcanic plains on the far side, Chang’e 6 could provide samples to directly test such theories. In particular, the Apollo Basin area where Chang’e 6 will land contains a variety of materials that require investigation.

Some evidence shows that there were two major volcanic eruptions in this area. Scientists believe that one of them covered the entire region in magma containing a small amount of titanium around 3.35 billion years ago. The other, which probably occurred 3.07 billion years ago, probably contained titanium-rich magma and erupted near the Chaffee S crater. Thus, the thickness is reduced.

Read more: Discovering new evidence of the impact that formed the Earth’s moon

New research shows that bringing samples from near the Chafi S crater will bring the most scientific benefits. This area has titanium-rich basalt in the upper part, titanium-free basalt in the lower part, and various pieces of projectile material from the impact.

“Joseph Michalski” (Joseph Michalski), a researcher at the University of Hong Kong and one of the researchers of this project said: “Diverse sample sources provide important information to answer a set of scientific questions about the Moon and the Apollo Basin.”

These diverse samples can also provide scientists with information about magmatic processes occurring on the far side of the moon. By comparing them with nearby samples brought back to Earth by the Apollo missions, scientists may be able to answer the question of why the number of volcanoes on the far side of the Moon is so limited.

This research was published in the journal “Earth and Planetary Science Letters”.

Continue Reading

Space

Discover a new answer to the ancient mystery of a Venus!

Published

on

By

Venus

New research from the University of Colorado Boulder shows that Venus is losing water faster than previously thought, which could provide information about the planet’s early habitability.

Discover a new answer to the ancient mystery of Venus!

Today, the atmosphere of Venus is as hot as an oven and drier than the driest desert on Earth, but our neighboring planet was not always like this.

According to Converse, billions of years ago, Venus had as much water as Earth today. If that water was once liquid, then Venus was probably once habitable.

Over time, almost all of Venus’s water reserves have been lost. Understanding how, when, and why Venus lost its water reserves will help planetary scientists understand what makes a planet habitable, or what can turn a habitable planet into an uninhabitable one.

Scientists have theories to explain why most of the water supplies have disappeared, but the amount of water that has disappeared is actually greater than predicted.

Research conducted at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder) reports the discovery of a new water removal process that has been overlooked in recent decades but could explain the mystery of water loss.

Energy balance and premature water loss

The solar system has a habitable zone. This region is a narrow ring around the Sun where planets can have liquid water on their surface. Earth is in the middle of the habitable zone, Mars is outside on the very cold side, and Venus is outside on the very hot side. The place of a planet in this habitable spectrum depends on the amount of energy received by the planet from the sun and also the amount of energy emitted by the planet.

The theory of how Venus loses water reserves is related to this energy balance. Sunlight on early Venus decomposed the water in its atmosphere into hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen warms a planet’s atmosphere, acting like having too many blankets on the bed in the summer.

When the planet gets too hot, it throws the blanket away. Hydrogen escapes into space in a process called “hydrodynamic escape”. This process removed one of the key elements, water, from Venus. It is not known exactly when this process occurred, but it was probably around the first billion years of Venus’ life.

Hydrodynamic volatilization stopped after most of the hydrogen was removed, but some hydrogen remained. This process is like pouring out the water in the bottle, after which there are still a few drops left in the bottle. The remaining droplets cannot escape in the same way, but there must be another process on Venus that continues to remove the hydrogen.

Small reactions and big differences

This new research suggests that a neglected chemical reaction in Venus’s atmosphere could produce enough volatile hydrogen to close the gap between the missing water supply and the observed water supply.

The way this chemical reaction works is in the research of the University of Colorado Boulder. In the atmosphere, HCO ⁺ gas molecules, which are composed of hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen atoms and have a positive charge, combine with negatively charged electrons.

When ⁺ HCO and electrons react, ⁺ HCO breaks down into a neutral carbon monoxide molecule, CO, and a hydrogen atom. This process gives the hydrogen atom the energy it needs to exceed the planet’s speed and escape into space. The whole reaction is called HCO ⁺ dissociative recombination, but the researchers abbreviated it as DR.

Water is the main source of hydrogen on Venus. Thus, the DR reaction dries out the planet. The DR reaction probably happened throughout the history of Venus, and this research shows that it probably continues to this day. This reaction doubles the rate of hydrogen escape previously calculated by planetary scientists, changing their understanding of current hydrogen escape on Venus.

Venus

Understanding the conditions of the planet Venus with data and computer models

Researchers in this project used computer modeling and data analysis to study DR in Venus.

Modeling actually began as Project Mars. Mars also had water before – though less than Venus – and lost most of it.

To understand the escape of hydrogen from Mars, the researchers created a computational model of the Martian atmosphere that simulated the chemistry of the Martian atmosphere. Despite being very different planets, Mars and Venus have similar atmospheres. Therefore, the researchers were able to use this model for Venus as well.

They found that the DR reaction produced large amounts of fugitive hydrogen in the atmospheres of both planets. This result is consistent with observations made by the Mars Atmospheric and Volatile Evolution Mission (MAVEN) orbiting Mars.

Collecting data in the Venus atmosphere would be valuable to support the computer model, but previous missions to Venus have not measured ⁺ HCO; Not because it doesn’t exist, but because they weren’t designed to detect it. However, they investigated the reactants that produce HCO ⁺ in Venus’s atmosphere.

By analyzing observations made by the Pioneer probe and using their knowledge of the planet’s chemistry, the researchers showed that ⁺ HCO is likely present in the atmosphere in similar amounts to the computer model.

Searching for water

This research has solved part of the puzzle of how planetary water reserves are lost, which affects how habitable a planet is. We have learned that water loss occurs not only in one moment but over time and through a combination of methods.

Read more: Maybe alien life is hidden in the rings of Saturn or Jupiter

The faster loss of hydrogen through the DR reaction means that it takes less time overall to remove the remaining water on Venus. Also, this means that if oceans existed on early Venus, they could have existed for much longer than scientists thought. This allows more time for potential life to develop. The research results do not mean that oceans or life definitely existed. Answering this question requires more science.

The need for new missions and observations of Venus is felt. Future missions to Venus will provide some atmospheric surveys but will not focus on its atmosphere. A future mission to Venus, similar to the Moon’s mission to Mars, could greatly expand our knowledge of how the atmospheres of terrestrial planets form and evolve over time.

With technological advances in recent decades and renewed interest in Venus blossoming, now is a great time to turn our gaze to Earth’s sister planet.

Continue Reading

Popular