Connect with us

Technology

Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy S23 FE

Published

on

Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy S23 FE

It’s an unlikely thing to compare the Samsung Galaxy A55 to the Galaxy S23 FE in an article, but Samsung’s pricing strategy made us compare the two phones. After launching this year’s popular Galaxy A55 at around €450 (now just over €400), the company has positioned it very close to its budget flagship, the Galaxy S23 FE.

Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy S23 FE

But these two phones are by no means created equal. The Galaxy S23 FE is still more expensive than the Galaxy A55 (it now retails for around €500), but it also offers a flagship-like experience, while the A55 tries to strike a good balance between hardware and cost. They have two different target audiences and very similar price tags.

  • Designing
  • screen
  • battery life
  • charge
  • Speaker test
  • Function
  • cameras
  • Summary

Before we compare, head over to our specs page and compare the Galaxy A55 vs S23 FE to see what we’re expecting in this comparison.

Size comparison

Comparison of Galaxy A55 and S23 FE

The Galaxy A55 and S23 FE are similar in size, but there are some notable differences. The S23 FE is the more compact choice, with a slightly smaller screen (0.2-inch difference) resulting in a shorter and slightly slimmer body.

The difference in absolute size may not seem like much on paper, but you can feel the difference by holding the two side by side.

The Galaxy S23 FE feels more comfortable in the hand due to its rounded side bezel. It feels better in the hand, as the Galaxy A55’s sharp edges sink into your palm. On the other hand, others will like the A55’s visual design more.

Build quality is pretty much the same – Gorilla Glass sheets on the front and back are held by aluminum side frames. Notably, the A55 leads the way with a newer Victus+ Gorilla Glass sheet on the front, while the S23 FE settles for Gorilla Glass 5. Instead, given the S23 FE’s higher IP68 ingress protection compared to it, you might have a bit more peace of mind. to IP67 A55, which means that its water resistance is slightly higher.

Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy S23 FE (Exynos)

Compare the show

Comparison of Galaxy A55 and S23 FE

Apart from the screen size, the Galaxy A55 and S23 FE have identical displays. If you’re looking for a slightly larger panel, the 6.6-inch OLED A55 will probably suit you, while the 6.4-inch OLED S23 FE will appeal to users looking for a more compact solution.

Both screens support HDR10+. They tick at 120Hz, the resolution is 1080p+, and we measured maximum brightness in manual and auto mode. The latter is equally bright with both – around  1000 nits.

Read more: Poco X6 Pro vs Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus

Battery Life

The difference in battery life between the two devices is night and day, and the smaller cell inside the Galaxy S23 FE is partly to blame.

The A55 has a standard 5,000 mAh unit, while the S23 FE settles for a 4,500 mAh battery. But the difference in endurance is so great that we can’t blame total capacity alone.

Note that we’re comparing the A55 to the Exynos version of the Galaxy S23 FE because the A55 isn’t available in the US yet, where you’ll usually find the Snapdragon S23 FE, which objectively has better battery life in all tests.

The Galaxy A55 beats the Exynos S23 FE in battery endurance tests. The average active use rating is 13:27 hours versus the S23 FE’s 8:28 hour active use rating.

Comparison of Galaxy A55 and S23 FE

Despite the larger screen, the A55 scored better in all four tests. The video playback time was twice as long. The Exynos 1480 is much more battery-friendly than the flagship Exynos 2200.

Charging Speed

The charging speed is not suitable for any of these two phones. Samsung has rated the charging capability of the A55 and S23 FE at 25 watts compared to the Power Delivery standard. Neither comes with a charger in the retail box either.

As expected, the difference in charge time is negligible despite the S23 FE’s smaller cell. The two seem equally slow at 15 and 30 minutes, but the A55 beats the S23 FE by a few minutes at the end of the charge cycle. However, the difference will remain negligible in the real world.

Comparison of Galaxy A55 and S23 FE

It is important to note the S23 FE’s wireless charging capabilities, which the A55 lacks. The former also supports 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, which can be useful for your wearable accessories that support wireless charging.

Speaker Test

The two phones share a similar hybrid stereo speaker setup, meaning one of the speakers doubles as a phone. But the tuning seems to be very different as well as the volume.

The Galaxy S23 FE is undoubtedly louder, reaching a loudness score of  -23.7 LUFS, with the A55   trailing at -25.7 LUFS, but still rated as ‘Very Good’.

Comparison of Galaxy A55 and S23 FE
However, upon closer inspection, the Galaxy A55 might be a better choice when it comes to sound quality. The Galaxy S23 FE’s bass is a bit deeper, but it’s barely noticeable. The A55 sounds cleaner overall, with more pronounced vocals and less distortion at high volume levels.

Function

To no one’s surprise, the Galaxy S23 FE outperforms the Galaxy A55 by a large margin. After all, the Exynos 2200 in the S23 FE is a flagship chipset, and the Exynos 1480 is a mid-range chip, even though it was recently released.

Comparison of Galaxy A55 and S23 FE

The memory configuration is the same, with both devices offering 8GB/128GB by default, capping the internal storage capacity at 256GB. The S23 FE only gives you up to 8GB of RAM, while the A55 can expand up to 12 GB. The second one also has a microSD card slot.

Benchmark Performance

We already know that the S23 FE (Exynos 2200) is more powerful, but by how much? Well, in pure CPU benchmarks, the Exynos 2200 outperforms the Exynos 1480 by around 18%, and the gap widens in single-core tasks – up to 41%.

Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy S23 FE

 

In mixed workloads, such as the AnTuTu 10 test, the difference is hard to ignore. The Exynos 2200 is about 56% faster than the Exynos 1480, and the Xclipse 920 GPU is probably the main reason for that.

An even bigger gap can be seen in GPU-based tests like 3DMark Wild Life, where the Galaxy A55’s Xclipse 530 GPU is more than twice as slow as the S23 FE’s Xclipse 920.

Camera Comparison

Interestingly, these two devices have very similar camera systems. They offer 50MP primary cameras using a 1/1.56-inch sensor size, f/1.8 aperture, and 1.0μm pixels. Both are also optically stabilized. The only difference is in the vendors.

The ultra-wide cameras are pretty much the same too – 12MP with f/2.2 aperture and a 123-degree field of view. Although the S23 FE has a slightly larger sensor behind the optics.

The Galaxy S23 FE is a more versatile solution as it has an 8MP telephoto camera with 3x zoom. That alone might sway buyers who are on the fence about the better photography solution of the two.

Image Quality

In terms of actual image quality, these two devices take very similar photos with their primary cameras. We can hardly find any meaningful difference between the two. However, the S23 FE’s ultra-wide resolution produces slightly better images – they’re cleaner and have a wider dynamic range.

The 3x telephoto camera beats the A55’s 2x zoom crop any day of the week. This is a very clear cut.

Galaxy A55: 0.6x Galaxy A55: 1x Galaxy A55: 2x
Galaxy A55: 0.6x • 1x • 2x
Galaxy S23 FE: 0.6x Galaxy S23 FE: 1x Galaxy S23 FE: 3x
Galaxy S23 FE: 0.6x • 1x • 3x

The S23 FE excels at night with better image processing and quality. It may be because the ISP chipset is more capable. Overall, images are cleaner and offer a wider dynamic range.

Summary

Looking at the specs sheet, the Galaxy S23 FE is more affordable despite the higher price tag. Under the hood, it has superior hardware and is also a more capable photographer. And if you’re looking for a more compact and convenient solution, the Galaxy S23 FE will certainly fit your palm better.

A deeper look reveals that the Galaxy A55 can get you a good chunk of the same distance for a slightly lower price. The A55 surprises with far superior battery life, identical display quality and specs, comparable performance of the main camera in various scenarios, and possibly a better stereo speaker setup.

So, unless raw camera performance and versatility aren’t your top priority, the Galaxy A55 is the more sensible choice of the two.

Samsung Galaxy A55

Advantages of Samsung Galaxy A55:

  • lower price.
  • Longer battery life
  • More beautiful speakers
  • Bigger screen

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

Advantages of Samsung Galaxy S23 FE:

  • More powerful camera setup.
  • Much better performance
  • Slightly louder speakers
  • More compact and convenient design.

Source: ٖGSMARENA.COM

Technology

Unveiling of OpenAI new artificial intelligence capabilities

Published

on

By

OpenAI

OpenAI claims that its free GPT-4o model can talk, laugh, sing, and see like a human. The company is also releasing a desktop version of ChatGPT’s large language model.

 Unveiling of OpenAI new artificial intelligence capabilities

Yesterday, OpenAI introduced the GPT-4o artificial intelligence model, which is a completely new model of the company’s artificial intelligence, which according to OpenAI is a step closer to a much more natural human-computer interaction.
This new model accepts any combination of text, audio, and image as input and can produce output in all three formats. It can also detect emotions, allow the user to interrupt it mid-speech, and respond almost as quickly as a human during a conversation.
In the live broadcast of the introduction of this new model, Meera Moratti, Chief Technology Officer of OpenAI, said: “The special thing about GPT-4o is that GPT-4 level intelligence has been made available to everyone, including our free users. This is the first time we’ve taken a big step forward in ease of use.
During the unveiling of the model, OpenAI demonstrated the GPT-4o, which translates live between English and Italian, with its intuitive ability to help a researcher solve a linear equation on paper in an instant, just by listening to The breaths of an OpenAI executive give him advice on deep breathing.
The letter “o” in the name of the GPT-4o model stands for the word “Omni”, which is a reference to the multifaceted capabilities of this model.
OpenAI said that GPT-4o is trained with text, images, and audio, meaning all input and output is processed by a neural network. This differs from the company’s previous models, including the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, which allowed users to ask questions just by speaking, but then converted the speech to text. This would cause tone and emotion to be lost and interactions to slow down.
OpenAI will make this new model available for free to everyone, including ChatGPT users, over the next few weeks, and will also initially release a desktop version of ChatGPT for Apple computers (Mac) for users who have purchased a subscription, starting today. They will have access to it. The introduction of the new OpenAI model took place one day before the Google I/O event, which is the company’s annual developer conference.
OpenAI
It should be noted that shortly after OpenAI introduced GPT-4o, Google also presented a version of its artificial intelligence known as Gemini with similar capabilities.
While the GPT-4 model excelled at tasks related to image and text analysis, the GPT-4o model integrates speech processing and expands its range of capabilities.

Natural human-computer interaction

According to OpenAI, the GPT-4o model is a step towards a much more natural human-computer interaction that accepts any combination of text, audio, and image as input and produces any combination of text, audio and image.
This model can respond to voice inputs in less than 232 milliseconds, with an average speed of 320 milliseconds, which is similar to the response time of humans in a conversation.
This model matches the performance of the GPT-4 Turbo model on English text and code with a significant improvement in converting text to non-English languages while being much faster and 50% cheaper via application programming interface (API). The GPT-4o model is especially better in visual and audio understanding compared to existing models.

What exactly does the introduction of this model mean for users?

The GPT-4o model significantly enhances the experience of ChatGPT, OpenAI’s wildly popular AI chatbot. Users can now interact with ChatGPT like a personal assistant, ask it questions and even hang it up wherever they want.
Additionally, as mentioned, OpenAI is introducing a desktop version of ChatGPT along with a revamped user interface.
“We recognize the increasing complexity of these models, but our goal is to make the interaction experience more intuitive and seamless,” Moratti emphasized. We want users to focus on working with GPT instead of being distracted by the UI. Our new model can reason text, audio, and video in real-time. This model is versatile, fun to work with, and a step toward a much more natural form of human-computer interaction, and even human-computer-computer interaction.
The GPT-4o model has also been extensively reviewed by more than 70 experts in areas such as social psychology, bias and fairness, and misinformation to identify risks introduced or enhanced by the newly added methods. OpenAI has used these learnings to develop safety interventions to improve the safety of interacting with GPT-4o. The members of the OpenAI team demonstrated their audio skills during the public presentation of this new model. A researcher named Mark Chen emphasized its ability to gauge emotions and noted its adaptability to user interruptions.
Chen demonstrated the model’s versatility by requesting a bedtime story in a variety of tones, from dramatic to robotic, and even had it read to him. As mentioned, this new model is available for free to all ChatGPT users. Until now, GPT-4 class models were only available to people who paid a monthly subscription.
“This is important to us because we want to make great AI tools available to everyone,” said OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

Strong market for generative artificial intelligence

OpenAI is leading the way in productive AI alongside Microsoft and Google, as companies across sectors rush to integrate AI-powered chatbots into their services to stay competitive.
For example, Anthropic, a competitor of OpenAI, recently unveiled its first corporate proposal to Apple to provide a free program for iPhones.
“We recognize that GPT-4o audio presentations present new risks,” OpenAI said in a statement. Today we’re publicly releasing text and image inputs and text outputs, and in the coming weeks and months, we’ll be working on the technical infrastructure, post-training usability, and security necessary to release other methods. For example, at startup, audio outputs are limited to a set of predefined sounds and adhere to our existing security policies. We will share more details about the full range of GPT-4o methods in a future system.
OpenAI
According to the report, the generative AI market saw a staggering $29.1 billion in investment across nearly 700 deals in 2023, up more than 260 percent from the previous year. Predictions indicate that the yield of this market will exceed one trillion dollars in the next decade. However, there are concerns about the rapid deployment of untested services by academics and ethicists who are troubled by the technology’s potential to perpetuate prejudice.
Since launching in November 2022, ChatGPT’s chatbot has broken records as the fastest-growing user base in history, with nearly 100 million weekly active users. OpenAI reports that more than 92% of the world’s top 500 companies use it.
At the presentation event last night, Moratti answered some questions from the audience and when he spoke in fluent Italian and the artificial intelligence translated his words into English, the hall was filled with excitement.
There is more. This means the next time you take a selfie, OpenAI’s artificial intelligence can assess your exact emotions. All you have to do is select a selfie and ask ChatGPT to tell you how you feel.
It should be said that OpenAI employees were so happy that ChatGPT asked them why they were so happy!

Continue Reading

Technology

Samsung S95B OLED TV review

Published

on

By

Samsung S95B OLED TV
The S95B TV is Samsung’s serious attempt to enter the OLED TV market after a decade of hiatus; But can it take back the OLED throne from LG?

Samsung S95B OLED TV review

What can be placed in a container with a depth of 4 mm? For example, 40 sheets of paper or 5 bank cards; But to think that Samsung has successfully packed a large 4K OLED panel into a depth of less than 4mm that can produce more than 2000 nits of brightness is amazing. Join me as I review the Samsung S95B TV.

Continue Reading

Technology

MacBook Air M3 review; Lovely, powerful and economical

Published

on

By

MacBook Air M3 review
The MacBook Air M3, with all its performance improvements, adds to the value and economic justification of the MacBook Air M1, rather than being an ideal purchase.

MacBook Air M3 review; Lovely, powerful and economical

If you are looking for a compact, well-made and high-quality laptop that can be used in daily and light use, the MacBook Air M3 review is not for you; So close the preceding article, visit the Zomit products section and choose one of the stores to buy MacBook Air M1 ; But if you, like me, are excited to read about the developments in the world of hardware and are curious to know about the performance of the M3 chip in the Dell MacBook Air 2024 , then stay with Zoomit.

Continue Reading

Popular