Connect with us

Technology

Kansai International Airport, Japan

Published

on

Kanzai International Airport
Kansai Airport, located in Osaka Bay, Japan, is one of the most amazing man-made structures on the seabed. How did the Japanese manage to build such a structure?

Kansai International Airport, Japan; An artificial terminal on the sea

Osaka Kansai Airport is built on an artificial island in Osaka Bay. This airport was opened in 1994 and its development operation was completed in 2007. It goes without saying that the construction of this airport was by no means an easy task; Although the Japanese are known to do difficult and regular engineering projects in the world. Two mountains were completely razed to the ground for the construction of the island, and according to the Civil Engineering Institute, this airport became the most expensive construction project in the world at the time of its completion.

Osaka Kanzai Airport

Despite the amazing engineering achievements such as withstanding earthquakes and strong storms that have been proven by the construction of this structure, in recent years structural problems have emerged in this island airport, most importantly the island is settling at a faster rate than originally predicted, and this has led to It has led to problems such as frequent flooding.

In this article, we will go into details about the background of the airport, construction operations, operation, and of course the future plans of the Japanese government for its development. By reading this article, you can learn about one of the most admirable civil engineering projects in human history, and of course, one of the most amazing airports in the world.

The initial idea for the construction of the airport

Need to build an airport in Osaka

In the 1960s and 1970s, several important events led to the construction of the airport. The first case was the decrease in the share of Osaka and Kobe in the trade market and the prosperity of business in Tokyo. The proposal to build Tokyo’s second airport called Narita was proposed in 1966 and its construction was completed in 1978. Many exporters had to use Tokyo airports instead of local airports to send their goods abroad.

The second case was the low capacity of Osaka’s first airport, Itami. Itami Airport is located in one of the densely populated suburbs of the Osaka metropolitan area. This airport was opened in 1939 and was first used by the Japanese army; But after World War II, the United States Army also used this airport. Since 1959, Itami Airport has been used for civilian purposes, and by carrying out development projects, it became one of the central hubs of international airlines in a short period of time.

Japan’s aviation industry experienced unprecedented growth within 20 to 30 years and since the 60s, the capacity of the Osaka airport alone did not meet the high volume of demand. Due to the location of Itami in the center of a densely populated area, there was no more space for the development of the airport. On the other hand, the noise pollution of the airport and the protests of residents of residential areas caused more problems for the only airport in Osaka. In the 1970s, Itami Airport reached its maximum capacity, and the officials concluded that Osaka needed a new airport.

Choosing a place to build

The construction of the artificial island was not the first option of the airport designers. In the initial plan, it was proposed to build an airport near the port city of Kobe. The construction of the airport in this place could be useful for both cities due to the existence of extensive communication infrastructure. In addition, Kobe did not have an airport. However, the city of Kobe opposed the construction of the airport in this place and the designers had to look for another place to build their airport.

Having learned from the problems encountered for Itami Airport, the designers were looking for a location far from urban areas. In this case, the construction site could advance the construction operation 24 hours a day. Also, the problems encountered in the design of Narita Airport in Tokyo were also one of the main influencing factors in choosing the location of the new Osaka Airport.

In the 1960s, public protests intensified by Osaka residents and landowners, who claimed that they were not consulted during the airport’s design process. On the other hand, the left-wing parties opposed the construction of this airport due to the concern about the expansion of the capitalist system in Japan and greater alliance with the United States of America

The Ministry of Transport of Japan, after reviewing six proposals for the construction of an airport in the sea, decided to build an artificial airport island in Osaka Bay south of the city. In the proposed plan, the island was 4 kilometers long and 2.5 kilometers wide, and it was built at a distance of 5 kilometers from the coast.

The construction of the airport required advanced and complex engineering; Because this airport had to be resistant to earthquakes, storms, and floods. After the approval of the proposed design, the construction of the island started in 1987.

Kanzai International Airport

History of construction of artificial islands in Japan

The idea of ​​building such a large island in a relatively deep bay (the water depth in Osaka Bay reaches 18 meters and its bed is made of soft clay to a depth of 30 meters) may seem ambitious. But Japan has a long history of building artificial land in water or so-called land reclamation; Because land is expensive and scarce in many areas of Japan.

The history of artificial land construction in Osaka Bay dates back to the Edo period (1600-1867 AD) when the land built in the sea was used to plant rice in the coastal plains. However the construction of artificial ground in Japan accelerated after the end of World War II; Because of the rapid increase in Japan’s economic growth, there was a great demand for new land. According to the statistics of the Japan Real Estate Center Construction Company, 0.5% of the land area of ​​Japan is artificial and reclaimed in the sea.

The construction of the airport started in 1987. First of all, the airport land had to be built inside the seawater. The construction of the artificial island took three years, and in order to obtain the required materials, two mountains located near the site of the airport were completely razed to the ground. The airport is actually built on two islands, each of which has a runway and a terminal. Although the construction of the entire airport structure started in 1987; But the first priority of the contractors was to complete Island No. 1, which was completed in 1994. The completion of the construction of the second island took until 2007. The first island with an area of ​​511 hectares is slightly smaller than the second island with 535 hectares.

The main challenge in building the islands was not the depth of the water but the conditions of the sea bed. The bed of Okasa Bay consists of soft clay, which is also called alluvial clay, and 70% of it is water.

To solve this problem, engineers used the sand drying method. In this method, deep tubes are lowered into the seabed, tubes filled with dry sand. When the pipes are removed from the seabed, the sand columns left behind absorb water from the clay and reduce its ability to shrink. By adding more weight of sand, more clay moisture is absorbed into the sand columns. 2 million sand columns were used to stabilize the Kanzai airport bed.

Despite the measures taken in the field of stabilization and strengthening of the seabed, the island and the airport built on it have settled over time. The creators of the project consulted with several experts to solve this issue, and finally, some estimates were prepared about the amount of airport settlement. According to reports from the University of California, San Jose, the estimates provided by the experts had predicted ground subsidence between 6 and 8 meters after the construction of the airport, so the engineers took the most pessimistic estimate and proceeded with the construction of the project, but as it turned out later, this strategy basically failed. It was wrong.

Construction of an airport on the Japanese island of Kanzai in the sea

After stabilizing the land, the next step was to build a sea wall and fill the reclaimed land. Around the construction site of the island, 69 large metal enclosures were built, and then the space between these enclosures was filled with 48,000 tetrapods. A Tetrapod is a special concrete structure designed to protect structures against waves and surges by dispersing the force of advancing water.

In the next step, the central space of the island was filled with stones. For this work, 430 million cubic meters of stone were used. This amount of stone was extracted from three nearby mountains at a distance of 10 to 30 kilometers from the airport construction site. One of the important points in the construction of the island was its final height. This height should have been calculated based on the estimates of the amount of sedimentation of the clay layer of the seabed. Of course, the subsidence of the bed layer would stop after some time, but the final amount of ground subsidence was not known to anyone.

According to the reports of Geotechnics and Geoenvironment magazine, the final height selected for the first island was 36.7 meters from the seabed, and for the second island, it was 40 to 43 meters.

The construction work of the airport and terminal facilities of the first island began in 1991 and after the completion of the revitalization of the first island. It should be mentioned that in the first stage, the goal was to build only one runway and one terminal. An Italian architect named Renzo Piano was commissioned to design the main building of Terminal 1. Piano had previously designed the Georges Pompidou National Center for Arts and Culture in Paris. Among his other works, we can mention the Potsdamer Platz square in Berlin and the pyramid-shaped Shard tower in London.

Terminal 1 of Kansai Airport is 1.7 kilometers long, and in this respect, it is called the longest terminal in the world. However, some of the world’s major airport terminals are higher than Kansai Terminal 1 in terms of total area, including the largest terminal in the world, Daxing Airport Terminal. pointed out in the city of Beijing. In the early stages of the construction of the airport structure, the Japanese government intended to shorten the length of the terminal to save costs; But Renzo Piano insisted on building the terminal based on the original plans.

The structural load of the terminal is supported by height-adjustable columns. The design of these columns is such that they compensate for the change in height caused by the settlement of the airport. This work is made possible by placing additional metal plates under the base of the column. The roof of the terminal has a shape similar to an airfoil. This design not only reminds passengers of the shape of an airplane wing; Rather, it helps the smooth passage of air currents over the roof of the terminal.

Kanzai International Airport, Japan

In addition to the island and the airport building, the construction of a communication road between the island and the mainland had to be done. For this purpose, a 3.7-kilometer bridge called the Kanzai International Airport Access Bridge was built. This bridge connects the island to the Rinko section. Rinko is one of the parts of the urban district of Osaka, which itself was built in the 1990s on reclaimed land.

The connecting bridge of Kanzai Airport is a two-story bridge with 6 car lanes, and two rail lines are also built on its lower floor. The construction of this bridge began in 1987 and was completed in 1994 at a cost of one billion dollars.

Kanzai Sea Bridge, Japan

Considering the experience of building Tokyo airport and the protests and disturbances that occurred during that project, the officials decided to take all possible measures to prevent a similar incident. Although they were largely successful in doing this by choosing the location of the airport, which was far from densely populated residential areas; But there were still problems along the way of the project. The most important objections to the project came from the local fishing industry; Because after the completion of the construction and operation of the airport, the work of local fishermen was disturbed. However, these protests were ended by an agreement to pay damages to the fishermen. However, there were protests in stone mining workshops, and during these protests, 24 attacks were reported on these workshops.

Construction stages of Kanzai Airport in Japan

The construction of the terminal and the second runway started in 2003. The reason for the delay in starting the second phase of the airport was that the airport contractor could measure the subsidence of the islands during this period. Before the start of the construction of the second landing strip, the issue of the meeting of the islands was more and more in the spotlight; However, due to the completion of Kansai Airport’s capacity during peak hours, the construction of the second landing strip was prioritized, but the construction of the second terminal was delayed.

The construction of the second runway was completed in 2009. This landing strip with a length of 4 kilometers is longer than the first landing strip with a length of 3500 meters. Terminal number two was put into operation in 2012. The building of the second terminal is simpler and more straightforward than the first terminal, it has only one floor and does not have a jet bridge or a bridge connecting to the aircraft. This terminal is specially designed for low-cost flights, where boarding and take-off fees are lower than in Terminal 1.

After the operation of the landing strip and the first terminal of Kansai Airport, more development and repair work was done on the structure of the airport and the island, especially the sea wall. When engineers realized that the airport was sinking faster than estimated, work began on raising the height of the seawall at a cost of $150 million.

Also, more plans have been proposed for the development of the airport, including the construction of a third runway and a cargo terminal. However, these plans have not been implemented yet.

Terminal 2 of Kanzai Airport, Japan

Osaka Kansai Airport was put into operation on September 4, 1994. Actually, on this date, only the runway and the first terminal were put into operation; This was while the construction of the second island, followed by the runway and the second terminal, continued. It didn’t take long for Kansai Airport to become the main hub for international flights, while Osaka’s Itami Airport was dedicated to domestic flights only.

But in the first months of the airport’s operation, the high tariffs shocked the airlines. According to a New York Times report in 1993, the Japanese government had increased land rent and airport tariffs to recover the 14 billion dollar cost of building this airport.

The amount of airport tariffs and navigation of Kansai Airport was unique in the world at the time. For example, the cost of landing a Boeing 747 was around 10 thousand dollars. This was while the cost of landing this plane at John F. It was $2,500 in New York and $8,500 in Tokyo’s Narita Airport.

Map of Osaka Kansai International Airport, Japan

Since 1994, Itami Airport has been dedicated to domestic flights only, although there were exceptions; Including charter and special or VIP flights. In order to increase flights at Kansai Airport, the Japanese government imposed restrictions on the operations of Itami Airport; Including the restriction that since 2006, only two-engine planes were allowed to land at Itami Airport.

In 2012, the management of Itami and Kansai airports were merged, however, the management of these two airports was still under the control of the Japanese government. This work improved the services of the two airports, including the operation of inter-airport bus routes and the reduction of Kansai Airport flight tariffs. In 2016, a Japanese private consortium named Kansai Airports won the tender for the operation of Itami and Kansai airports, and the management of these two airports was entrusted to this consortium by the Japanese government for 45 years. In 2018, the operation of Kobe Airport was also added to this contract.

The capacity of the airport to move cargo and passengers

In 2019, Kanzai Airport was the third busiest airport in Japan and the 30th busiest airport in Asia. According to the information published by this airport’s website, the volume of passengers and cargo moved at Osaka Kansai Airport is as follows:

  • Number of transferred passengers: 28.8 million people, of which 22 million were international passengers
  • The volume of transported cargo: 757 thousand tons

For comparison, consider that in 2018, Narita Airport in the Japanese capital handled 33.4 million passengers and 2.2 million tons of cargo, according to Japanese government data. Maybe Kanzai Airport is not the busiest airport in Asia or Japan, But it can be said that it is one of the most popular destinations for travelers. In 2020, Kansai Airport was ranked the 10th most popular airport in the world and the second most popular airport in the category of medium-sized airports in the list of the best airports in the world. This airport has also won the award for the best airport crew and the best baggage delivery process among all airports in the world.

Kansai International Airport

Coping with hurricanes and earthquakes

The most important point that was considered in the design and construction of Kansai Airport was the severe weather hazards in Japan and the need to protect the airport in these conditions. Perhaps the biggest test that the airport design went through was in January 1995, just one year after the airport was opened when a severe earthquake struck the area. The Kobe earthquake, also known as the Great Hanshin earthquake, was the most severe earthquake in Japan since 1923 and killed 6,000 people. The epicenter of this earthquake was located 20 kilometers away from the airport, and although it caused a lot of damage to buildings further away, almost no damage was done to the airport. Experts attribute this success against the 7-magnitude earthquake to the sliding joints that have been used throughout the airport building.

Hanshin Awai earthquake in Japan

Also, in the past years, Kansai Airport has survived big storms, for example, in 1998, a powerful storm hit the airport with a speed of 210 km/h. In 2018, another terrible typhoon called Typhoon Jebi hit the Osaka area and Kansai Airport. This was the strongest typhoon in Japan since 1993, which caused widespread damage in the Kansai area.

Typhoon Jabi caused high waves in the sea and overflowing of water from the top of the sea walls of the airport, resulting in flooding of the runway, and a tanker ship hitting the airport access bridge caused damage to this bridge. After Typhoon Jabi, it took more than a month for the airport to fully return to operational mode. Although typhoon Jebi was a severe and rare weather hazard, it raised discussions about the problems related to the amount of settlement of the islands and the reduction of the height of the airport.

Is the airport sinking?

Ever since the Kansai Airport construction project was proposed on reclaimed land in the sea, the issue of land subsidence has always occupied the minds of its designers and builders. The airport’s foundation rests on a thick layer of clay, and since the early days of design, there have been varying estimates of how much the island will subside in the coming years.

The method of drying the clay by using the sand columns used to strengthen the seabed causes more settlement of the wet layers that are under the dried layers and are further compressed due to the weight of the island. Of course, it should be mentioned that the weight of the airport building and its planes is almost nothing compared to the huge weight of the stones used to build the island.

According to the International Institute of Civil Engineering, the amount of airport subsidence has decreased from 50 cm in 1994 to 7 cm in 2008.

Reaching the ultimate limit of subsidence

Also, in 2015, a study was conducted on the amount of subsidence of Kansai Airport, the results of which were published in the Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. In the design of the airport, it was predicted that the final amount of subsidence of the island after the stabilization of the soil and reaching the final limit of compression would be such that the airport would be 4 meters above sea level, a height that could still prevent the airport from flooding if the sea walls of the island are destroyed. But this study showed that the first island reached this level of subsidence by 2015 and it is predicted that the second island will reach this level of subsidence between 2023 and 2026. In addition, in the same study, it is predicted that the first island will level with the sea in 2067 and the second island between 2058 and 2100 due to subsidence.

This problem occurred as a result of the design engineers’ incorrect estimation of the actual subsidence of the seabed. Yukako Handa, public relations manager of Kansai Airports Consortium, said in an interview with Air and Space magazine:

During the construction of Kansai Airport, the amount of soil needed to rehabilitate the land in the sea was estimated based on the minimum necessary height and the amount of settlement of the airport after 50 years from the time of its construction.

Kanzai Airport, Japan

Another concern raised in Yukako Handa’s interview is the different amounts of subsidence measured in different parts of the airport. For example, in the center of the main terminal of the airport on the first island, the ground is sinking faster than the two ends of the terminal. Before that, a different subsidence rate was recorded in other areas of the island, for this purpose and to prevent cracking and damage to the landing strip, asphalt was used instead of concrete to restore its surface.

Read More: China owns the world’s most powerful supersonic wind tunnel

Kansai International Airport

What is the solution to deal with unexpected subsidence?

Of course, the rate of airport subsidence in the coming years may differ from current estimates, just as the current rate of subsidence differs from initial estimates. The greater risk of subsidence that threatens the airport is the decrease in its height compared to the water level, which means that storms of any intensity can cause water to rise from the sea walls and flood the airport. Not much can be done to solve the root of this problem, But the predictions made during the construction of the airport allow the engineers to take measures to minimize the damage to the airport and the disruption of its operation.

One of these measures can be increasing the height of the sea walls, which was done once before and at a staggering cost. However, other plans have been proposed to further increase the height of the walls. Singapore’s Straits Times reported that the three-year operation to increase the height of Kansai Airport’s sea walls was approved and started in 2019.

In addition, there are plans to increase the height of the runway by adding new layers of asphalt to it. According to the information presented in this Singaporean newspaper, a budget of 510 million dollars (54 billion yen) has been allocated for this airport to carry out measures to prevent the occurrence of disasters, a figure that could increase due to the ongoing projects.

The entrance to Kanza International Airport in Japan

One of the other preventive measures can be increasing the height of the airport building. As mentioned earlier in the article, the foundation columns of the airport building can be adjusted and this is done by inserting metal plates at the base of the columns. According to the report of Irandaspiz magazine, the process of inspecting the columns and changing their height, if necessary, is done by the contractor every two years.

Kansai Airport, one of several island airports

Despite all these problems, Osaka Kansai Airport has been recognized and praised as an important engineering achievement. With the construction of this airport, important experiences were gained that led to the development of engineering methods to overcome the challenge of land subsidence and of course the construction of more island airports.

One of the other important experiences gained from the construction of Kanzai Airport is the importance of the builders’ attention to the costs of such a project. According to estimates made in 2004, the cost of building this airport was estimated at 8 billion, according to the report of Irandaspis magazine. But in 2008, the cost of construction increased to 20 billion dollars, the main cause of which was the problems that arose in the field of land reclamation and the construction of the artificial island.

In the continuation and at the end of this article, we mention other similar important island airports; We will also provide a brief description of Kobe Airport, which is operated jointly with Kansai and Itami Airports under an agreement.

Hong Kong International Airport

Another one of the world’s most important island airports is located in Hong Kong. Hong Kong International Airport, formerly Chek Lap Kok Airport, was opened in 1998 and replaced the old Kai Tak Airport. Kaitak Airport, which started operating in 1925, was surrounded by extensive urban construction and suffered from the same development problems and noise pollution as Itami Airport.

Itami Airport, Japan

The place to build the artificial island of this airport was chosen in the 1980s. According to the chosen location, it is possible to develop this airport like the Kansai airport, and due to its distance from urban areas, it was possible to carry out 24-hour construction operations and of course to operate it. The materials needed to build the artificial island and rehabilitate the airport land with an area of ​​12.4 square kilometers were provided by two local islands. According to the Hong Kong airport authorities, the airport’s land reclamation operation added 1 percent to the total area of ​​Hong Kong!

Hong Kong International Airport

Like Osaka Kansai Airport, the possibility of implementing development projects for Hong Kong Airport is also foreseen. There are currently plans to build a third runway by reclaiming more land in the northern part of the airport.

Kobe Airport

The city of Kobe, which had not used the opportunity to host Kansai Airport before, started operating its island airport in 2006. Plans to build a special airport for Kobe gained momentum when an earthquake near the city highlighted the need for critical infrastructure such as an airport to help the region’s economic redevelopment.

Kobe Airport is built with a landing strip near the coast of this city and on an artificial island. This airport is much smaller than its counterpart in Kanzai city and is dedicated only to domestic flights and some regional flights.

Kobe Airport

Nagoya Centrair Airport is the second airport in Japan that was built on an artificial island. Of course, it should be mentioned that Nagasaki Airport was built before Chobu Centrair, but its construction was done on an island that was revived and used in another project before that.

The construction of Nagoya Chobu Island and Airport started in 2000 and ended in 2005. This airport is used by the people of Nagoya and its suburbs. It should be noted that this area is the third largest metropolitan area in Japan after Tokyo and Osaka. Here, too, the purpose of building an airport on an island was to stay away from dense urban areas and enable its 24-hour operation. Of course, one of the other motivations for the construction of Chubu Centrair Airport in this place is the presence of heavy industries such as Toyota and Mitsubishi in this area.

Malé Airport in the Maldives

Japan is not the only country that builds its airports on the island. The country of Maldives is also very eager to do this and the reason is simple; There is not enough space to build an airport in this country.

Malé Airport, Maldives

The main airport of the Maldives, Male International Airport, is built on the island of Helhola. Halholah is not an artificial or restored island, but rather a coral island or atoll. This airport has a 3.2 km runway and is only 2 meters above the water level.

What do you think about airport island structures around the world?

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Space

The strangest things that can happen to humans in space

Published

on

By

The strangest things that can happen to humans in space
Leaving the Earth’s atmosphere is not just the experience of floating in the environment. There are also other amazing and troublesome events that can only be experienced in space. In this article, we will talk about the strangest things that can happen to humans in space.

The strangest things that can happen to humans in space

When it comes to space and astronautics, we all remember very interesting movies in which strange things happen to astronauts. Movies with exciting stories, most of which are nothing but the authors’ imaginations; But there are other very amazing stories happening in space that are completely real and have nothing to do with human imagination. In this article, we try to discuss some examples of these events and introduce you to the wonders of space travel.

Continue Reading

Technology

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra review

Published

on

By

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra

Reviews of Motorola Edge 50 Ultra phone, price, technical specifications, design, screen, software, hardware, battery life and charging, and other specifications of this phone.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra review

The Motorola Edge 50 continues to grow today with new additions to the lineup. After launching the Edge 50 Pro earlier this month, the OEM is now introducing the Edge 50 Ultra and Edge 50 Fusion. As expected, the Ultra is at the top of the range, while the Fusion is the most affordable of the three.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review

We will take a closer look at the Edge 50 Ultra and its flagship features. After all, this is Motorola’s top-of-the-line smartphone for 2024, and it offers a ton of premium features, including AI capabilities and a Pantone-calibrated display and cameras for more accurate and vivid color reproduction.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra specifications at a glance:

  • Body:  161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6mm, 197g; Victus gorilla glass front, acetate back (wood based) or silicon polymer back (vegan leather), aluminum frame; IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 minutes).
  • Display:  6.70 inch OLED, 1B color, 144Hz, HDR10+, resolution 1220x2712px, aspect ratio 20.01:9, 444ppi.
  • Chipset:  Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm): Octa-core (1×3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4×2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3×2.0 GHz Cortex-A520); Adreno 735.
  • Memory:  512 GB RAM 12 GB, 1 TB 16 GB RAM; UFS 4.0.
  • Operating System/Software:  Android 14.
  • Rear camera:  Wide (main)  : 50 MP, 1/1.3-inch f/1.6, 2.4 µm, multi-directional PDAF, laser autofocus, OIS;  Telephoto  : 64 MP, f/2.4, 1.4 µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom;  Ultra wide angle  : 50 MP, f/2.0, 1.28 µm, 122 degrees, AF.
  • Front camera:  50 MP, f/1.9, 1.28 µm, AF.
  • Videography:  Rear camera  : 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS.  Front camera  : 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps.
  • Battery:  4500 mAh; 125W wired, 50W wireless, 10W reverse wireless.
  • Connectivity:  5G; two SIM cards; Wi-Fi 7; BT 5.4; NFC, UWB, USB-C 3.1 Gen 2 with DP 1.4 support.
  • Other specifications:  fingerprint reader (under the display, optical); stereo speakers; Ready to support 6.

AI functions are possible thanks to the new Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset, which sits between last year’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and this year’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. while maintaining a relatively low price. Motorola seems to be looking for a more affordable flagship segment.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review

But despite the small agreement in the chipset department, Motorola does not make cameras, displays and chargers. The 6.7-inch OLED panel packs all the punch, runs at up to 144Hz and can charge up to 125W (wireless is 50W). The camera hardware looks good on paper. We’ve got a 50MP main sensor assisted by a 50MP ultra-wide unit and a 64MP 3x telephoto camera with a reliable f/2.4 aperture. Even the selfie unit is 50MP with autofocus, which is rare even in the ultra-premium segment.

Designing

The overall design language of the Edge 50 Ultra follows the Edge 50 family, and since the screen is the same as the Edge 50 Pro, the two phones feel the same in the hand. The Ultra comes in two variants – with a vegetable leather or wooden back. The latter is a bold approach, but will likely appeal to some.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review

Available colors include Forest Gray and Peach Fuzz (both vegetable leather options) and Nordic Wood (pictured below).

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review

Of course, the wooden back is not pure wood. Motorola has used a special coating for the surface that preserves the wood-like texture while protecting it from water and oil, so it doesn’t change color or lose its appearance. Either way, the imitation is pretty good – almost like real wood.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review

The Edge 50 Ultra and the Edge 50 Pro look so similar that it would be hard to tell them apart if they both had plant-based leather. Camera hardware ditches the Edge 50 Ultra, as the telephoto uses a periscope lens and the round LED flash is replaced by a smaller, vertical flash.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Edge 50 ProMotorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Edge 50 Pro

The front and back panels are still rounded, which helps with grip, and to be honest, the wooden back is easier to hold. It also brings back a distant memory of Motorola’s Moto X in 2013 with its bamboo and wooden back.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review

The side frame is still aluminum, while the front glass is Gorilla Glass Victus. And for a 6.7-inch device with this many cameras, the weight gain at 197 grams is pretty impressive. Leather and wood are lighter than glass, so that could be an explanation.

- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
- Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review

As expected from a high-end smartphone like the Edge 50 Ultra, the device has IP68 ingress protection.

Hardware

The Edge 50 Ultra and Pro have very similar hardware for the most part, but as we mentioned earlier, the Edge 50 Ultra has a more powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chip that delivers flagship-level performance and features. One notable limitation is the chipset’s inability to record 8K videos. 4K is capped.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Edge 50 ProMotorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Edge 50 Pro

The curved OLED panel is a small step above the competition in terms of refresh rate, as the Edge 50 Ultra’s 6.7-inch display supports a 144Hz refresh rate. It remains to be seen whether Motorola has been able to make the best use of the display’s capabilities.

In addition to the 144Hz refresh rate, the panel also has support for HDR10+, 10-bit color depth, and DC dimming for those who might be sensitive to regular PWM dimming. It can also push up to a maximum brightness of 2,500 nits, but we suspect this will be achievable in small patches during HDR video playback.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review

For a complete multimedia experience, Motorola has put more effort into the speakers as well. They are tuned by Dolby Atmos and support Dolby Head Tracking.

A fairly average 4,500 mAh battery keeps the lights on, but capacity isn’t everything. We’ll see if Motorola’s hardware and software tweaks can compensate for the smaller-than-usual battery pack. It is good that Edge 50 Ultra is equipped with 125W wired charging and 50W wireless charging.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review

The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has two significant hardware advantages over some of its competitors. It supports ultra-wideband connectivity (a feature only seen on a handful of Android smartphones) and USB 3.1 gen 2 with DisplayPort 1.4 compatibility. It works well with Motorola’s Ready For desktop environment.

Of course, the Edge 50 Ultra runs on the latest Android 14 with Motorola’s own features. Motorola offers productive AI capabilities for wallpaper customization purposes, but other than that, AI is almost non-existent in Motorola’s current software.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on reviewHowever, the OEM insists on implementing system-wide AI algorithms that work in the background. AI-based algorithms are supposed to optimize performance, battery life, and search.

Camera

Undoubtedly, one of the main features of Edge 50 Ultra is its camera. Motorola hosted a special press event in Morocco where we had a chance to try out the pre-production Motorola Edge 50 Ultra unit along with the rest of the Edge 50 lineup. The camera samples here were all taken over the course of a day at locations and events organized by Motorola.

  • Wide (primary)  : 50 MP, 1/1.3-inch f/1.6, 2.4 µm, multi-directional PDAF, laser autofocus, OIS; 2160p@60fps
  • Telephoto camera  : 64 MP, f/2.4, 1.4 μm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom; 2160p@30fps
  • Ultra-wide angle: 50 MP, f/2.0, 1.28 µm, 122 degrees, AF. 2160p@30fps
  • Front camera:  50 MP, f/1.9, 1.28 µm, AF. 2160@30fps

When it comes to camera hardware, the Ultra stands out in the Edge 50 family with a total of four powerful cameras. The main camera uses a large 50-megapixel 1/1.3-inch sensor with a wide f/1.6 aperture and stabilized optics.

Daylight Main Camera Samples - f/1.6, ISO 100, 1/1228s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review Daylight Main Camera Samples - f/1.6, ISO 100, 1/264s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review Daylight Main Camera Samples - f/1.6, ISO 101, 1/1697s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review
Daylight Main Camera Samples - f/1.6, ISO 100, 1/490s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review Daylight Main Camera Samples - f/1.6, ISO 100, 1/462s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review Daylight Main Camera Samples - f/1.6, ISO 100, 1/513s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review
Daylight Main Camera Samples - f/1.6, ISO 100, 1/238s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review Daylight Main Camera Samples - f/1.6, ISO 100, 1/306s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review Daylight Main Camera Samples - f/1.6, ISO 469, 1/120s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review
Examples of original Daylight cameras
Main camera samples in low light - f/1.6, ISO 6075, 1/17s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Low-light main camera samples - f/1.6, ISO 4600, 1/33s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Main camera samples in low light - f/1.6, ISO 3100, 1/50s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
Low-light main camera samples - f/1.6, ISO 3725, 1/33s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Low-light main camera samples - f/1.6, ISO 20800, 1/10s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Main camera samples in low light - f/1.6, ISO 4250, 1/33s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
Examples of the main camera in low light

The 64-megapixel telephoto camera has a 3x optical zoom and f/2.4 aperture.

Telephoto camera samples of the day - f/2.4, ISO 105, 1/200s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Telephoto camera samples of the day - f/2.4, ISO 100, 1/231s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Telephoto camera samples of the day - f/2.4, ISO 100, 1/731s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
Telephoto camera examples in the day - f/2.4, ISO 100, 1/612s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Telephoto camera samples of the day - f/2.4, ISO 100, 1/370s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Telephoto camera samples of the day - f/2.4, ISO 143, 1/200s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
Telephoto camera examples in the day - f/2.4, ISO 198, 1/200s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Telephoto camera examples in the day - f/2.4, ISO 134, 1/200s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Telephoto camera examples in the day - f/2.4, ISO 198, 1/200s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
Examples of telephoto cameras during the day
6x zoom camera samples - f/2.4, ISO 160, 1/296s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review 6x zoom camera samples - f/2.4, ISO 113, 1/200s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review 6x zoom camera samples - f/2.4, ISO 100, 1/404s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
Examples of cameras with 6x zoom
Low-light telephoto camera samples - f/2.4, ISO 10074, 1/14s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Low-light telephoto camera samples - f/2.4, ISO 11620, 1/14s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
Examples of telephoto cameras in low light

And the secondary secondary camera is a 50-megapixel ultra-wide unit with a wide 122-degree FoV, f/2.0 aperture, and autofocus support for macro shots.

Daylight Ultrawide Camera Examples - f/2.0, ISO 100, 1/442s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review Daylight Ultra Wide Camera Examples - f/2.0, ISO 100, 1/319s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review
Daylight Ultra Wide Camera Examples - f/2.0, ISO 141, 1/200s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review Daylight Ultra Wide Camera Examples - f/2.0, ISO 925, 1/50s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-On Review
Examples of ultra wide daylight cameras
Close-ups: Main camera - f/1.6, ISO 161, 1/200s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Close-ups: Ultra-wide camera - f/2.0, ISO 400, 1/135s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
Close-ups: Main camera • Ultra-wide camera
Low-light ultra-wide camera sample - f/2.0, ISO 19200, 1/10s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
An example of a low-light ultra-wide camera

The selfie camera is impressive, at least on paper, with a 50-megapixel resolution, f/1.9 wide aperture, and autofocus support. It’s 2024 and we hardly ever see phones with AF-equipped selfie cameras, so kudos to Motorola for adding this feature.

Selfie - f/1.9, ISO 141, 1/200s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review Selfie - f/1.9, ISO 181, 1/200s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
Selfie photos

But not only the hardware of the camera itself, its software features and optimization as well. Although AI isn’t the main focus on the software side, Motorola benefits greatly from AI-based camera optimizations.

Related article:  Motorola Edge 50 Pro phone review, technical specifications

Let’s start with the action shot. The camera software automatically increases and adjusts the shutter speed in low-light environments to minimize motion blur. We did a brief test of the feature and found that in some cases, the shutter speed went from 1/50 to 1/200, while at the same time, the ISO doubled from 3100 to 6200. This is without any significant increase in noise thanks to the AI-based noise reduction algorithm. Here is a short example.

Action Shot Examples - f/1.6, ISO 6275, 1/206s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review Action Shot Examples - f/1.6, ISO 6200, 1/212s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Hands-on Review Action shot examples - f/1.6, ISO 6300, 1/203s - Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on review
Examples of action shots

Adaptive stabilization works in video mode and dynamically adjusts the level of stabilization based on your hand movement and scenario.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on reviewAutofocus tracking is another video-based feature that improves the sharpness of footage from subjects moving quickly through the frame. This one will be available with the next update.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on reviewIt’s worth noting that Motorola offers a choice between natural and auto-enhanced shooting modes, with the former being the default mode. Auto-enhancement mode apparently takes longer to capture images, but we didn’t notice a slowdown when using it. . Also, this isn’t exactly a Motorola exclusive. This is actually the Auto Enhance feature that we all know from the Google Photos app. Motorola decided to integrate this feature into the camera app for convenience, but the system only saves “enhanced” photos, not “normal” photos.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on reviewIt’s a bit early to comment on the camera quality as we took samples with the pre-production unit. But before we get a production-ready phone, let’s take a look at some videos taken with all the cameras.

Summary

As always, it’s a little early to say whether the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a good buy or not, but it’s certainly a promising one. The phone has all the features of a true flagship phone, while the price starts at €999, which is considered affordable in today’s flagship segment. Over time, the price will come down and the phone will become a more attractive option.

Motorola Edge 50 Ultra hands-on reviewIn any case, despite the promising hardware, the full review will reveal whether the 4,500 mAh battery is enough for reliable endurance, and it will be interesting to see how the new camera system stacks up against the competition. The Moto Edge 50 Ultra is expected to hit the market by the end of May, and a lot can change between now and then.

Source: GSMARENA.COM

Continue Reading

Technology

Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy A35

Published

on

By

Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy A35

With the launch of the Galaxy A55 5G and A35 5G phones, both of which are among the mid-range products of this company, we saw many improvements compared to the previous versions.

Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy A35

Samsung’s mid-range products are improving every year. Now, with the release of Galaxy A55 5G and A35 5G, both of which are among the mid-range products of this company, we saw many improvements compared to the previous versions. In this article, we are going to compare A55 and A35 phones. These two phones are very similar in terms of appearance, but in other parts, there are differences in these two phones, each of which can be very important for users. Stay with us until the end of the Samsung A55 and A35 phone comparison.

As mentioned, it’s hard to tell the difference between the two phones based on their specs. However, we see that when comparing more closely, their differences become more prominent.

Comparison of A55 and A35 phones

Comparison of the video of Samsung A55 and A35

The mid-range Samsung Galaxy A55 and A35 phones have been made available to us by the ” Technolife ” online store. Teknolife is one of the largest collections of smartphones, wearable gadgets, and other electronic devices. To get more information about Technolife’s product portfolio, enter the website of this online store.

Specifications

phone name Galaxy A55 Galaxy A35
Display 6.6-inch OLD with a resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a variable refresh rate of 120 Hz / maximum brightness of 1000 nits 6.6-inch Super AMOLED with a resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a variable refresh rate of 120 Hz / maximum brightness of 1000 nits
chipset Exynos 1480 (4nm) Exynos 1380 (5nm)
RAM memory 8 or 12 GB 6, 8 or 12 GB
internal memory 128 or 256 GB 128 or 256 GB
Operating system (at the time of release) Android 14 and One UI 6.1 skin Android 14 and One UI 6.1 skin
Main camera The triple camera includes a 50-megapixel main camera, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide camera, and a 5-megapixel macro camera. The triple camera includes a 50-megapixel main camera, an 8-megapixel ultra-wide camera, and a 5-megapixel macro camera.
selfie camera 32 megapixels 16 megapixels
battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging technology Wired 25 watts Wired 25 watts
Weight 213 grams 209 grams
body Glass back frame/aluminum frame / protective glass Gorilla Glass Victus + for the display / IP67 standard to resist the penetration of dust and splashing water drops Glass back frame/aluminum frame / protective glass Gorilla Glass Victus + for the display / IP67 standard to resist the penetration of dust and splashing water drops

Design and display

Both Galaxy A55 5G and Galaxy A35 5G use the design language of Galaxy S24. It is for this reason that these two models are very similar in appearance. However, last year we saw that Samsung’s mid-range to flagship phones were all similar in terms of design, and the difference was seen in the hardware and build quality.

The Galaxy A55 5G uses metal and Gorilla Glass Victus+, which is an excellent specification for a mid-range device. The A35 also has a glass back frame without Gorilla Glass protection and a plastic frame. The most obvious difference between these two phones in terms of design and build quality is related to the material of their frames, which we see in the bigger brother, the A55, which this year has used a brushed aluminum frame.

Continuing the comparison of A55 and A35, we should mention that in terms of size, both are almost similar. The Galaxy A55 5G is slightly slimmer and lighter. The Galaxy A35 5G is about 4 grams heavier, but the difference is barely noticeable.

Comparison of A55 and A35 phones: design and display

Both phones have IP67 water and dust resistance. This means that both phones are equally resistant to dust and water. Admittedly, that’s a step down from the IP68 certification found on many Samsung phones, but in the phone category, it doesn’t matter much if you can drop the phone deeper.

Regarding the port and buttons, we should mention that a new curve can be seen on the right side of the phones. This new design on the right edge of these two phones makes it easier to recognize the location of the buttons during use. In addition, it has helped to make the phone comfortable. Above this section, there are power buttons and volume buttons. There is also a USB Type-C port on the bottom edge that you can use to charge phones using the cable in the box. Of course, don’t expect that there is any charge inside the box. In recent years, Samsung has generally removed the charger from its product box and only offers a charging cable.

Galaxy A35 5G and Galaxy A55 5G both have 6.6-inch screens and in terms of screen dimensions, both are slightly larger than last year’s version. This is for those who are interested in bigger phones; It is good news. Although the difference compared to last year is only 0.2 inches, this change has made both of these phones feel more premium to the user.

The rest of the display specifications are very close. Each earphone was equipped with Super AMOLED screens and a maximum refresh rate of 120Hz, which provide a very smooth and smooth experience in the user interface and playing games.

Comparison of A55 and A35 phones

Performance and software

Both the Galaxy A55 5G and Galaxy A35 5G are based on Samsung’s mid-range Exynos chips. These two models use Exynos 1480 and Exynos 1380 chips respectively. Considering the history of Gegenios chips and the fact that these chips are mid-range anyway, they should not be compared with the new versions of Snapdragon.

With mid-range Exynos chips in last year’s Galaxy A54 and Galaxy A34, they provided average and acceptable performance. The Galaxy A54 came with the same Exynos 1380 and now the same chip is used in the A35.

Performance and software

Predictably, the Galaxy A55 5G beats the Galaxy A35 due to its faster Exynos chip. According to various benchmark tests, the Galaxy A55 outperforms the Galaxy A35 in both GeekBench 6 and 3DMark. This means that Samsung’s new mid-range chip has improved performance compared to last year’s version.

phone name Antutu 9 GeekBench 5
Multi-Core
PCMark
Work 3.0
3DMark
WL Unlimited
3DMark
WLE Unlimited
Galaxy A55 635598 3352 13208 3905 1034
Galaxy A35 522829 2742 12545 2797 892

As for memory and storage, both devices are available in three versions. You can get the Galaxy A55 5G with 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of storage. The Galaxy A35 5G comes with 128GB of storage and either 6GB or 8GB of RAM, although a 256GB version with 8GB of RAM is also available for purchase.

Both of these phones came with Android 14 and One UI 6.1 and get up to 4 years of Android updates and 5 years of security updates.

Read More: Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Galaxy S23 FE

Comparison of A55 and A35 phones in the camera department

Both the A55 5G and Galaxy A35 5G have triple cameras, but you’ll be using two of those lenses roughly 99% of the time. Why? Because the third lens is for macro photography. Samsung has been using this macro lens in its phones for several years. Although many users don’t use this lens, the company has decided to stick with it instead of using an efficient telephoto lens. We hope to see this change in mid-range phones in next year’s models.

A55 and A35 phone camera

In terms of specifications, the main difference is in the ultra-wide megapixels of the Derby. The Galaxy A55 5G comes with a 50-megapixel main camera and a 12-megapixel ultra-wide camera; While the Galaxy A35 5G is equipped with a 50-megapixel main camera and an 8-megapixel ultra-wide camera. Both phones also have the same 5-megapixel macro camera as mentioned. The main camera of this phone is the same. So most of the photos you’ll take in this mode are similar, but the A55’s ultra-wide shots are better. However, the difference is not so great.

On the front, the Galaxy A55 5G has a 32-megapixel selfie camera. In contrast, the Galaxy A35 5G has a 13-megapixel selfie camera. In terms of quality, the Galaxy A55 5G performs better, but the difference between the photos is not much at first glance. In the portrait mode, the separation of the subject from the background is better in A55. In contrast, the photos of A35 in portrait mode look a little artificial.

Main camera

In terms of quality, we can’t see any major differences between the Galaxy A55 and the Galaxy A35.

Ultra-wide camera

Night photography

The zoom capability of the camera on both devices is not very good, so it is recommended to do zoom photography only when necessary. Otherwise, you may be disappointed with the result. Although 2X digital zoom is suitable for photography, but when you increase the zoom value, the quality of the photos will drop drastically.

Comparison of A55 and A35 phones

Speaker and fingerprint sensor

In terms of sound quality, the A54 and Galaxy A34 weren’t flawless, but both the Galaxy A55 5G and Galaxy A35 5G nailed many of the issues. The Galaxy A55 5G has slightly better sound quality than the Galaxy A35, but the difference is very small and you can tell the difference after listening to the same sound several times. But the sound of A55 is a little louder than A35.

The fingerprint sensor is not the best in any of the phones, but the result is satisfactory. The speed of fingerprint recognition in the A55 phone is half a second faster than the cheaper model.

Battery life and charging

Both phones have 5,000 mAh batteries, which is a standard battery capacity. Of course, the A55 and the Galaxy A35 5G are different in terms of performance due to the difference in the processor, and the A55 has a better performance in this field.

According to the PCMark benchmark that we took to measure the battery life of these phones, the A55 recorded half an hour more screen time. However, this half hour may not be felt in real and daily use.

Conclusion

In this article, we compared A55 and A35 phones. As you have seen in different parts of this article, the biggest difference between these two phones is their frame and camera performance. Although A55 has a more powerful chip, it does not make a difference in the user interface experience. Both of these phones can handle popular games well. The aluminum frame of the A55 phone is one of the advantages of this phone, which can be very important for users. Due to the price difference, these two phones do not show special performance in the A55 model, although, in the video recording department, the A55 phone provides better output due to having a much better stabilizer.

Continue Reading

Popular