Connect with us

Space

Seven Amazing Discoveries About Jupiter

Published

on

Jupiter
Over the past half century, when Jupiter has been the target of numerous telescopes and probes, new and surprising discoveries have been made about this fascinating planet.

Seven Amazing Discoveries About Jupiter

Among the planets of the solar system, Jupiter is the largest and oldest planet and is often seen as the second brightest object after Venus in the night sky. Scientists have been tracking this gas giant since the first telescopes were built. In 1610, Galileo Galilei, in addition to observing the planet Jupiter, discovered its four big moons. This discovery led Galileo to claim that the Earth, like Galileo’s four moons, revolves around a larger astronomical body.

The most important feature of the planet Jupiter is its extreme heaviness. Thanks to its gravitational pull, Jupiter plays the role of the big brother in the solar system, as it has played a role in many historical events. Four billion years ago, the gravitational force of Jupiter along with Saturn threw comets and asteroids into the solar system. Such an event led to a period of massive upheaval known as the Late Heavy Bombardment. During this period, asteroids bombarded the inner part of the solar system and created many impact craters that we see on the surface of the moon today.

In the past 50 years, space missions and the construction of powerful telescopes have allowed scientists to reach beyond Jupiter’s clouds and dissect the planet with unprecedented clarity. Scientists also found that Jupiter’s environment is very harsh. Long-lasting storms swirl around the planet, covering its surface with multicolored stripes. Lethal levels of radiation can roast any object approaching the planet. Like their host planet, the Galilean moons are turbulent worlds.

The planet Jupiter, with its swirling mantle and turbulent nature, has inspired people’s imaginations as well as scientists’ research for years. Research in recent years has made researchers more interested in investigating the nature of this distant world than before. In this article, we discuss some of the most fascinating discoveries made about Jupiter and its moons in the last fifty years.

Jupiter has a strange core

JupiterJupiter has a dense core of strange nature

As a gaseous planet, Jupiter is not rocky and the nature of its core is unclear. The central core of this planet is a dilute mixture of heavy element solids and gases compressed by gravity. In fact, the planet Jupiter has a consistency similar to bubble tea; In this way, it is still soft on the outside, but it is somewhat hardened in the middle and ends up with a dense core.

In 2017, the Juno probe revealed details of Jupiter’s strange interior through measurements of its gravitational field. In this technique, small changes in the gravitational pull imposed on the probe are recorded. In this case, the gravity data did not resemble planets with precise solid-liquid boundaries, leading scientists to conclude that Jupiter has a fuzzy core. “We still don’t know exactly what’s going on inside Jupiter,” said Heidi Becker, a NASA planetary scientist and one of the leaders of the Juno probe.

Understanding Jupiter’s core can reveal clues to how the planet formed. Most protoplanets form by accreting solids until they become heavy enough and then gather gases around them. To describe Jupiter’s data, scientists hypothesized that Jupiter may never stop accumulating solids as it grows; As a result, the planet may be an uneven mixture of solids and gases from the center to the surface.

According to another hypothesis, a massive impactor similar in size and weight to Jupiter crashed into it, disrupting its interior and blurring the boundary between the mantle and the core.

A powerful magnetosphere creates energetic currents

Jupiter's magnetic fieldJupiter’s magnetosphere doesn’t give the solar wind a chance

Earth’s magnetic field originates from the molten and rotating iron inside the core, which creates a kind of driving force. In Jupiter, a rare type of material called metallic hydrogen strengthens the magnetic field.

Jupiter’s heaviness means its strong pressure on the core and causes the formation of a strange substance that does not exist in other parts of the solar system. Hydrogen, which is the lightest element in the periodic table and is usually seen as a gas, is compressed in Jupiter to the point where its electrons are separated from its atoms and move freely.

The sea of ​​free electrons creates a kind of driving force and a very strong magnetic field. Jupiter’s sphere of magnetic influence is even wider than that of the Sun. This magnetosphere is large enough to shield the planet from the solar wind and deflect solar particles up to Saturn’s orbit. In fact, Jupiter may even be an elusive target for the solar wind, but the planet and its moons emit their own energetic particles. These particles are trapped and accelerated by the magnetic field that shields Jupiter from ion bombardment.

The charged particles originate from Jupiter’s moon Io, whose volcanic material is stirred up by the escape of electrons from their molecules. Free electrons travel around Jupiter at nearly the speed of light, emitting radio waves. These radio waves are problematic from a scientific perspective because they interfere with the radar signals that scientists send from Earth to probe Jupiter’s interior.

The electron beam also creates a belt of beams that slam into visiting spacecraft. Considering all these obstacles, scientists built the Juno probe like an armored tank, so that all its sensitive electronic components are housed in an electron-shielding titanium dome, which weighs approximately 181 kilograms.

It should be mentioned that the strong magnetosphere of Jupiter creates impressive auroras. This happens when electrons moving in different directions collide with atoms in the atmosphere and create light bursts. Due to the fact that the magnetic field is large enough to cover the moons, it will direct the lava emitted from Io to another point. Scientists have also seen these pollutants on Europa, another moon of Jupiter hundreds of kilometers away from Io.

Jupiter is always hot

Heat on JupiterThe Hubble Space Telescope captured this image of electric blue auroras at Jupiter’s north pole

Jupiter has not cooled since its early days and has been emitting heat since billions of years ago. Scientists believe that this heat helps to strengthen the strong storms that engulf Jupiter’s atmosphere.

In 1979, the Voyager probe measured the amount of heat emitted by this gas giant while passing by Jupiter. Scientists found that Jupiter was emitting more heat than the models predicted: some parts of the planet were burning at temperatures of 426 degrees Celsius, more than researchers expected.

The mystery of Jupiter’s hidden heat was solved four decades later when scientists at the Keck Observatory began mapping Jupiter’s temperatures. The planet had the coldest temperature near the equator and the hottest temperature near the magnetic poles, where the auroras shine brightly. This finding indicated that auroras are a source of additional heat. Io’s plasma collides with Jupiter’s atmosphere to produce spectacular auroras. This plasma moves in the opposite direction of Jupiter’s fast winds to provide enough friction to raise the global temperature.

Jupiter boasts unique moons

Jupiter's moonsFrom left to right, Ganymede, Callisto, Io, and Europa are Jupiter’s largest moons. For the first time, Galileo observed these moons with his telescope in 1610.

Jupiter’s relationship with its moons goes beyond the exchange of chemicals. The planet can also heat its moons through its gravitational field. This long-range heating is visible among the four Galilean moons. Jupiter’s gravitational field has turned these moons into the fascinating worlds they are today.

According to University of California planetary scientist Michael H. Wong, the Galilean moons aren’t the only heavy stationary objects in space that have been bombarded. Rather, these moons have internal activities through a mechanism known as lethal heating. With the moons dancing at near and far distances from Jupiter on elliptical orbits, the gravitational pull battle between the moons and Jupiter provides enough friction to cook them.

Consequently, the Galilean moons do not resemble dead worlds like Earth’s moon. Of the four moons, Io experiences the full wrath of Jupiter’s gravity. Compared to its parent planet, Io is the most volcanically active moon in the entire solar system. Its icy sister Europa not only bears no resemblance to this volcanic world but has a vast ocean of liquid water beneath its frozen crust. Europa is a prime target in the search for planetary habitability because it is temperate enough to potentially harbor life, thanks to Jupiter’s lethal heating processes.

Jupiter’s unique clouds and atmosphere

Clouds of JupiterFrom a high angle, the swirling, smoke-like texture of Jupiter’s surface

Although 90% of Jupiter’s atmosphere consists of hydrogen, its air is full of other elements that cause the beautiful white and orange colors on the surface of this gas giant. On Jupiter’s surface, molecules of acetylene, hydrogen sulfide, and phosphine cover the face of the planet in swirling currents.

The Galileo probe landed on Jupiter’s gaseous body in 1995 and got a brief view of it. According to the findings of this probe, Jupiter has three types of clouds: clouds made of ammonia, ammonium hydrosulfide clouds, and water ice clouds. As a result, different types of rainfall are based on the height in Jupiter’s sky.

The Galileo probe also discovered a surface rich in heavy gases, far beyond what scientists expected. This chemical clue points to a vibrant past. Jupiter probably formed at a distance from the Sun where it was cold enough to absorb ice and frozen gases. According to the theories, the gas giant gradually moved towards the Sun until Saturn stopped it from moving further towards the Sun. Otherwise, Jupiter would probably be swallowed by the sun.

Extreme weather patterns

Jupiter weatherArtist’s rendering of thunderstorms at the top of Jupiter’s clouds

Jupiter is home to some of the most impressive storms, with the Great Red Spot being one of the most well-known. This is a tornado with a speed of 643 km/h and a depth of 482 km. Although the Great Red Storm has lasted for more than two decades, it is shrinking today. The dimensions of the eye of the storm in the past were three times the size of the earth, and today its size has reached one earth; But despite the reduction in size, it is still the largest living storm in the solar system.

Jupiter’s upper atmosphere hosts thunderstorms. In 2020, when Juno placed its camera on the planet’s dark side, it detected faint flashes of light that were lightning bolts. On Earth, lightning occurs when ice particles and water droplets in clouds collide with each other and lead to the separation of positive and negative charges.

At first, scientists thought that the formation of lightning on the surface of Jupiter was impossible and they thought that the temperature at this altitude was too cold for the existence of liquid water; But Jupiter has enough liquid water in its upper atmosphere thanks to ammonia gas that acts as an antifreeze.

Storms can also throw ice particles from the depths, and when the ice hits ammonia, it creates a ball of water and ammonia, which is a type of hail containing solid ice and liquid water. When it rains, these balls absorb the remaining ammonia gases on their way, and this phenomenon can explain the absence of ammonia in the atmosphere.

Yes, the customer has a ring

Jupiter ring
Jupiter’s ring consists of four thin subrings that move above its equator.

Jupiter’s rings are too thin to be observed with a telescope, so they were not revealed for a long time. These rings were discovered in 1979 during a low-altitude flyby of the Voyager spacecraft and have since been observed by powerful ground-based telescopes and other spacecraft.

Jupiter, like other ringed planets, has a ring field made of pebbles. This ring is made up of fragments of disintegrated meteorites that have gathered around Jupiter. This loose and irregular mixture of rock, ice and dust covers a distance of 51,500 km to 209,214 km from the surface of the planet.

As other objects pass through the ring, they may leave trails in the dust stream. One of these collisions was the fall of Comet Shoemaker Levi 9 on Jupiter in 1994. Years later, the Galileo and New Horizons probes found oscillations in Jupiter’s rings caused by fragments of the comet.

Space

Europa Clipper, NASA’s flagship probe was launched

Published

on

By

Europa Clipper
The highly anticipated Europa Clipper probe has finally begun its long journey to uncover the mysteries of Europa, Jupiter’s moon, by launching aboard a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket.

Europa Clipper, NASA’s flagship probe was launched

After years of waiting, NASA’s Europa Clipper probe was finally launched on Monday at 7:36 p.m. Iran time from the Kennedy Space Center on top of SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket and began a major astrobiology mission to Europa, the potentially habitable moon of Jupiter.

As SpaceX’s massive rocket powered by 27 powerful Merlin engines lifted off from pad 39A, NASA live broadcast reporter Dron Neal said, “The launch of Falcon Heavy with Europa Clipper will reveal the secrets of the vast ocean beneath the icy crust of Europa, Jupiter’s moon. It has been hidden, it will reveal.”

The engines of the two side boosters of the Falcon Heavy were shut down and separated from the central booster approximately three minutes after the flight. The central booster continued to fly for another minute, and then in the fourth minute of the launch, the separation of the upper stage from the first stage was confirmed. Finally, 58 minutes later, Europa Clipper was injected into interplanetary orbit as scheduled. A few minutes later, the mission team made contact with the probe, and people in the control room cheered and applauded.

Falcon Heavy’s unique launch

The launch of NASA’s new probe was delayed due to some mishaps. NASA and SpaceX initially planned to launch the Europa Clipper mission on Thursday, October 10; But with powerful Hurricane Milton hitting Florida’s Gulf Coast on Wednesday evening, a delay in the launch became inevitable. NASA shut down Kennedy Space Center to deal with the storm, and Europa Clipper was placed inside SpaceX’s hangar near Launch Pad 39A.

The recent launch was Falcon Heavy’s 11th flight overall and its second interplanetary mission. Also, this was the first flight of the Falcon Heavy, when all three boosters of the first stage of the rocket were deployed.

Typically, the Falcon Heavy and Falcon 9 first-stage boosters store enough fuel to perform landing maneuvers for recovery and reuse in the future; But Europa Clipper needed all the power that Falcon Heavy could provide in order to make it on its way to the Jupiter system.

A long way to the launch pad

In late 2015, the US Congress directed NASA to launch Europa Clipper using the Space Launch System (SLS), NASA’s massive rocket. SLS was still under construction at the time and was several years away from reaching the launch pad. The delay in completing the construction of this powerful rocket and NASA’s need to assign at least the first three versions of SLS to the Artemis lunar mission caused the Europa Clipper launch date to be in an aura of uncertainty.

In the 2021 House budget draft for NASA, the agency was directed to launch Europa Clipper by 2025 and, if possible, with SLS. However, due to the unavailability of the Space Launch System, NASA had to go to SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy. This decision was not without cost. As the most powerful rocket ever used in an operational mission, SLS can send Europa Clipper directly to the Jupiter system in less than three years.

Europa Clipper will use the gravitational assistance of Mars and Earth on its way to the Jupiter system

Now, even in Falcon Heavy’s fully disposable mode, the Clipper’s trip to Europe takes almost twice as long. The probe should make a flyby of Mars in February 2025 and a flyby of Earth in December 2026 to gain enough speed to reach its destination in April 2030.

Missile problems were not the only obstacles facing Europa Clipper on its way to the launch pad. For example, the rising costs of this five billion dollar probe forced NASA to cancel the construction of one of the probe’s science instruments. This instrument, named “Identification of Europa’s internal features using a magnetometer” (ICEMAG), was designed to measure Europa’s magnetic field.

Then in May 2024, NASA found that transistors similar to those used in Europa Clipper, which are responsible for regulating the probe’s electricity, were “failing at lower-than-expected radiation doses.” Following this discovery, NASA conducted more tests on the transistors and finally concluded in late August that these components could support the initial mission in the radiation-rich environment around Jupiter.

Ambitious mission to a fascinating moon

Imaging from the Europa Clipper probe over Europa, Jupiter's oceanic moon

NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory-Caltech

Europa Clipper is one of NASA’s most exciting and ambitious flagship missions, and it has impressive features. For example, the mission probe is the largest spacecraft NASA has ever built for a planetary mission. Europa Clipper weighed almost 6,000 kg at the time of launch and will be more than 30 meters long (bigger than a basketball court) by opening its huge solar panels in space.

Clipper’s Europa destination is also a prominent location: Europa, one of Jupiter’s four Galilean moons. The moon is covered with an icy outer shell, which scientists believe hides a vast ocean of salty liquid water. For this reason, Europa is considered one of the best places in the solar system to support alien life.

In early 2012, studies began to look for potential plumes of water rising from Europa’s surface. Some researchers theorize that those water columns and vents from which the columns protrude may contain evidence of life living beneath the moon’s icy crust. However, NASA scientists have made it clear that Europa Clipper is not looking for extraterrestrial life in Europa; Rather, this probe will only investigate the potential of the submoon water environment to support life.

“If there’s life on Europa, it’s going to be under the ocean,” Bonnie Buratti, senior Europa Clipper scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said in September. As a result, we cannot see it.” “We will be looking for organic chemicals that are prerequisites for life on the surface of the moon,” Borrati added. There are things we can observe; such as DNA or RNA; But we don’t expect to see them. As a result, [the probe] is only looking for habitable environments and evidence for the ingredients of life, rather than life itself.”

NASA scientists have made it clear that Europa Clipper is not looking for extraterrestrial life in Europa

Europa Clipper will collect data using a suite of nine scientific instruments, including visible and thermal cameras, several spectrometers, and special equipment to identify Europa’s magnetic environment. As stated on NASA’s Europa Clipper page, the probe will help scientists achieve three main goals:

  • Determining the thickness of Europa’s ice sheet and understanding how Europa’s ocean interacts with the lunar surface.
  • Investigating the composition of Europa’s ocean to determine whether it has the materials necessary to form and sustain life.
  • Studying the formation of Europe’s surface features and discovering signs of recent geological activities; such as the sliding of crustal plates or the discharge of water columns in space.

Europa Clipper also transports Earth’s culture to the Solar System. A piece called “In Praise of Mystery: A Poem for Europe” by Edda Lemon, a famous American poet, is engraved in the artist’s own handwriting on a metal plate. In addition, the probe carries a coin-sized chip that contains the names of 2.6 million inhabitants of planet Earth.

6-year journey

Illustration of Europe Clipper over Europe

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics

If all goes according to plan, Europa Clipper will enter Jupiter’s orbit in April 2030. When the probe gets there, it will use up 50-60% of its 2,722 kg of fuel by performing an injection maneuver for 6-8 hours.

The injection maneuver puts Europa Clipper in an elliptical orbit around the gas giant. A series of long maneuvers will then be performed to align the trajectory so that the probe can fly by Europa more than 45 times and study it closely. In fact, Europa Clipper will remain around Jupiter throughout its mission; Because according to the launch environment of Europa, it will be very dangerous for the spacecraft to go around the moon.

If all goes according to plan, Europa Clipper will enter Jupiter’s orbit in April 2030

The first flight over Europe will not take place before the spring of 2031. NASA will use the first pass to make further corrections to Europa Clipper’s trajectory in preparation for the probe’s first science mission. With the start of scientific flybys in May 2031, Europa Clipper will aim its array of sensors towards the far hemisphere from Jupiter and will approach the surface of the moon up to 25 km. The second science campaign will begin two years later, in May 2033, in the Jupiter-facing hemisphere of Europa.

The end of the Europa Clipper mission is set for September 2034. At that time, NASA will crash the spacecraft into Ganymede, another Galilean moon of Jupiter. This disposal strategy was chosen because Ganymede is considered a relatively poor candidate to host life, and the mission team wanted to make sure they did not contaminate potentially life-hosting Europa with terrestrial microbes.

Continue Reading

Space

Dark matter and ordinary matter can interact without gravity!

Published

on

By

dark matter
Dark matter and ordinary matter can interact without gravity! Dark matter, which has five times the mass of normal matter, helps hold galaxies together and explains the puzzling motions of stars. Now a new study has shown that these two substances can interact with each other without the presence of gravity.

Dark matter and ordinary matter can interact without gravity!

Why is dark matter associated with the adjective “dark”? Is it because it harbors some evil forces of the universe or hidden secrets that scientists don’t want us to know? No, it is not. Such fanciful assumptions may sound appealing to a conspiracy theorist, but they are far from the truth.

Dark matter is called dark because it does not interact with light. So when dark matter and light collide, they pass each other. This is also why scientists have not been able to detect dark matter until now; it does not react to light.

Although it has mass and mass creates gravity, this means that dark matter can interact with normal matter and vice versa. Such interactions are rare, and gravity is the only known force that causes these two forms of matter to interact.

However, a new study suggests that dark matter and ordinary matter interact in ways other than gravity.

If this theory is correct, it shows that our existing models of dark matter are somewhat wrong. In addition, it can lead to the development of new and better tools for the detection of dark matter.

Read more: There is more than one way for planets to be born

A new missing link between dark and ordinary matter

Dark matter is believed to have about five times the mass of normal matter in our universe, which helps hold galaxies together and explains some of the motions of stars that don’t make sense based on the presence of visible matter alone.

For example, one of the strongest lines of evidence for the existence of dark matter is the observation of rotation curves in galaxies, which show that stars at the outer edges of spiral galaxies rotate at rates similar to those near the center. These observations indicate the presence of an invisible mass.

Also, for their study, the researchers studied six ultra-dim dwarf (UFD) galaxies located near the Milky Way. However, in terms of their mass, these galaxies have fewer stars than they should. This means they are mostly made up of dark matter.

According to the researchers, if dark matter and normal matter interact only through gravity, the stars in these UFDs should be denser in the centers and more spread out toward the edges of the galaxies. However, if they interact in other ways, the star distribution looks different.

The authors of the study ran computer simulations to investigate both possibilities. When they tested this for all six ultra-dim dwarf (UFD) galaxies, they found that the distribution of stars was uniform, meaning that the stars were spread evenly across the galaxies.

This was in contrast to what is generally observed for gravitational interactions between dark matter and normal matter.

What causes this interaction?

The results of the simulations showed that gravity is not the only force that can make dark matter and normal matter interact. Such an interaction has never been observed before, and it could change our understanding of dark matter and dark energy.

However, this study has a major limitation. What caused the interaction between the two forms of matter is still a mystery. While the current study provides tantalizing hints of a novel interaction, its exact nature and underlying causes remain unknown. Hopefully, further research will clarify the details of such interactions.

This study was published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Continue Reading

Space

James Webb Space Telescope deepens cosmology’s biggest controversy

Published

on

By

James Webb Space Telescope
Despite the published data from the James Webb Telescope of the early universe, the question of the Hubble tension, or discrepancy in measurements of the cosmological constant, has not yet been resolved.

How the James Webb Space Telescope deepens cosmology’s biggest controversy

Summary of the article:

  • Almost a century ago, Edwin Hubble discovered the expansion of the universe and calculated the expansion rate or the cosmic constant.
  • Since Hubble, many groups have tried to measure the expansion rate of the universe. However, the values ​​they obtained differed from the theoretical predictions. This difference is called Hubble tension.
  • Scientists today use three methods to measure the expansion rate of the universe: Cephasian variable stars, TRGB red giant stars, and JAGB asymptotic giants.
  • However, the Hubble tension still exists, indicating that the methods for calculating the Hubble constant suffer from a systematic flaw.
  • Researchers hope to be able to use the James Webb telescope in the coming years to achieve more accurate measurements of the universe’s expansion rate and thus resolve the Hubble tension.

Almost a century ago, Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe was getting bigger. However, today’s measurements of how fast the universe is expanding are contradictory. These discrepancies show that our understanding of the laws of physics may be incomplete. On the other hand, everyone expected the sharp eyes of the James Webb telescope to bring us closer to the answer to the riddle; But a new analysis of the telescope’s long-awaited observations once again reflects inconsistent expansion rates from different types of data, while pointing to possible sources of error.

Two competing groups have led efforts to measure the rate of expansion of the universe, known as Hubble’s constant, or H0. A group led by Adam Reiss of Johns Hopkins University, relying on the known constituents of the universe and the governing equations, has consistently calculated the Hubble constant to be approximately 8 percent higher than the theory predicts the universe’s expansion rate. This discrepancy, known as the Hubble tension, indicates that the model of the cosmological theory may have missed some elements such as raw materials or effects that speed up the expansion of the universe. Such an element can be a clue to a more complete understanding of the world.

This spring, Reiss and his team published new measurements of the Hubble constant based on data from the James Webb Telescope and found a value consistent with their previous estimates. However, a rival group led by Wendy Friedman of the University of Chicago warns that more precise measurements are needed. The team’s measurements of the Hubble constant are closer to the theoretical estimate than Riess’ calculations, suggesting that the Hubble stress may not be real.

Since the commissioning of the James Webb Telescope in 2022, the astrophysical community has been waiting for Friedman’s multidimensional analysis based on telescope observations of three types of stars. The results are now as follows: the two-star types provide estimates of the Hubble constant that are in line with the theoretical prediction; While the results of the third star, which is the same type used by Reiss, are consistent with his team’s higher estimates of Hubble’s constant. According to Friedman, the fact that the results of the three methods are contradictory does not mean that there are unknown physical foundations, but that there are some systematic errors in the calculation methods.

Contradictory world

The difficult part of measuring cosmic expansion is measuring the distance of space objects. In 1912, American astronomer Henrietta Levitt first used pulsating stars known as Cephasian variables to calculate distances. These stars flicker at a rate proportional to their intrinsic luminosity. By understanding the luminosity or radiant power of a Cephasian variable, we can compare it with its apparent brightness or dimming to estimate its galaxy’s distance from us.

Edwin Hubble used Levitt’s method to measure the distances to a set of galaxies hosting the Cephasian variable, and in 1929 he noticed that the galaxies that are farther away from us are moving away faster. This finding meant the expansion of the universe. Hubble calculated the expansion rate to be a constant value of 500 km/s per megaparsec. In other words, two galaxies that are 1 megaparsec or approximately 3.2 million light years apart are moving away from each other at a speed of 500 km/s.

As progress was made in calibrating the relationship between the pulsation frequency of Cepheids and their luminosity, measurements of the Hubble constant improved. However, since the Cephasian variables are very bright, the whole approach used has limitations. Scientists need a new way to measure the distance of galaxies from each other in the infinite space.

In the 1970s, researchers used Cephasian variables to measure the distance to bright supernovae, and in this way they achieved more accurate measurements of the Hubble constant. At that time, as now, two research groups undertook the measurements, and using supernovae and Cephasian variable stars, they achieved contradictory values ​​of 50 km/s per megaparsec and 100 km/s per megaparsec. However, no agreement was reached and everything became completely bipolar.

Edwin Hubble next to the telescopeEdwin Hubble, the American astronomer who discovered the expansion of the universe, stands next to the Schmidt telescope at the Palomar Observatory in this photo from 1949.

The launch of the Hubble Space Telescope in 1990 gave astronomers a new and multi-layered view of the universe. Friedman led a multi-year observing campaign with Hubble, and in 2001 he and his colleagues estimated the expansion rate to be 72 km/s/Mpa with an uncertainty of at most 10%.

A Nobel laureate for the discovery of dark energy, Reiss got into the expansion game a few years later. In 2011, his group found the Hubble constant to be 73 with a three percent uncertainty. Soon after this, cosmologists excelled in another way. In 2013, they used Planck’s observations of light left over from the early universe to determine the exact shape and composition of the early universe.

In the next step, the researchers connected their findings to Einstein’s theory of general relativity and developed a theoretical model to predict the current state of the universe, up to approximately 14 billion years into the future. Based on these calculations, the universe should be expanding at an approximate rate of 67.4 km/s per megaparsec with an uncertainty of less than one percent.

Reese’s team measurement remained at 73, even with the improved accuracy. This higher value indicates that the galaxies today are moving away from each other at a faster rate than theoretically expected. This is how the Hubble tension was born. According to Reiss, today’s Hubble tension shows us that something is missing in the cosmological model.

The missing factor could be the first new element in the universe to be discovered since dark energy. Theorists still have doubts about the identity of this agent. Perhaps this force is some kind of repulsive energy that lasted for a short time in the early universe, or perhaps it is the primordial magnetic fields created during the Big Bang, or perhaps what is being missed is more about ourselves than the universe.

Ways of seeing

Some cosmologists, including Friedman, suspected that unknown errors were to blame for Hubble’s tension. For example, Cephasian variable stars are located in the disks of younger galaxies in regions full of stars, dust, and gas. Even with Hubble’s fine resolution, you don’t see a single Cephasian variable, according to George Afstatio, an astrophysicist at the University of Cambridge. Rather, you see it overlapping with other stars. This density of stars makes measurements of brightness difficult.

When the James Webb Telescope launches in 2021, Reiss and his colleagues will use its powerful infrared camera to peer into the crowded regions that host the Cephasian variables. They wanted to know whether the claims of Friedman and other researchers about the effect of the area’s crowding on the observations were correct.

James Webb telescope mirrorsThe 6.5-meter multi-section mirror of the James Webb Space Telescope at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland. This mirror passed various test stages in 2017.

When the researchers compared the new numbers to distances calculated from Hubble data, they saw a surprising match. The latest results from the James Webb telescope confirmed the Hubble constant measured by the Hubble telescope a few years ago: 73 km/s/Mpa with a difference of one kilometer or so.

Concerned about crowding, Friedman turned to alternative stars that could serve as distance indicators. These stars are found in the outer reaches of galaxies and away from the crowd. One of those stars belongs to the group ” Red Giant Branch ” or TRGB for short. A red giant is an old star with a puffy atmosphere that shines brightly in the red light spectrum. As a red giant ages, it eventually burns helium in its core, and at this point, the star’s temperature and brightness suddenly decrease.

A typical galaxy has many red giants. If you plot the brightness of these stars against their temperature, you reach a point where the brightness drops off. The star population before this brightness drop is a good distance indicator; Because in each galaxy, such a population has a similar distribution of luminosity. By comparing the brightness of these star populations, astronomers can estimate their relative distances.

The Hubble tension shows that the standard model of the cosmos is missing something

Regardless of the method used, physicists must calculate the absolute distance of at least one galaxy as a reference point in order to calibrate the entire scale. Using TRGB as a distance index is more complicated than using Kyphousian variables. MacKinnon and colleagues used nine wavelength filters from the James Webb telescope to understand how brightness relates to their color.

Astronomers are also looking for a new indicator: carbon-rich stars that belong to a group known as the “Jay region asymptotic giant” (JAGB). These stars are far from the bright disk of the galaxy and emit a lot of infrared light. However, it was not possible to observe them at long distances until James Webb’s launch.

Friedman and his team have applied for observation time with the James Webb Space Telescope in order to observe TRGBs and JAGBs, along with more fixed spacing indices and Cephasian variables, in 11 galaxies.

The vanishing solution

On March 13, 2024, Friedman, Lee, and the rest of the team meet in Chicago to find out what they’ve been hiding from each other. Over the past months, they were divided into three groups, each tasked with measuring distances to 11 galaxies using one of three methods: Cephasian variable stars, TRGBs, and JAGBs.

These galaxies also host related types of supernovae, so their distances can calibrate the distances of supernovae in many more distant galaxies. The rate at which galaxies move away from us divided by their distance gives the value of the Hubble constant.

Wendy FriedmanWendy Friedman at the University of Chicago is trying to fit the James Webb Telescope observations into the Standard Cosmological Model.

Three groups of researchers calculated distance measures with a unique, random counterbalancing value added to the data. During the face-to-face session, they removed those values ​​and compared the results.

All three methods obtained similar distances with three percent uncertainty. Finally, the group calculated three values ​​of Hubble’s constant for each distance index. All values ​​were within the theoretical prediction range of 67.4. Therefore, Hubble’s tension seemed to be resolved. However, they ran into problems with further analysis to write the results.

The JAGB analysis was good, But the other two were wrong. The team found that there were large error bars in the TRGB measurements. They tried to minimize the errors by including more TRGBs; But when they started doing this, they found that the distance to the galaxies was less than they first thought. This change caused the value of Hubble’s constant to increase.

Friedman’s team also discovered an error in Cephaus’s analysis: in almost half of the pulsating stars, the term crowd was applied twice. Correcting this error increased the value of Hubble’s constant significantly. Hubble’s tension was revived.

Finally, after efforts to fix the errors, the researchers’ paper presents three distinct values ​​of Hubble’s constant. The JAGB measurement yielded a result of 67.96 km/s/megaparsec. The TRGB result was equal to 69.85 with similar error margins. Hubble’s constant was obtained at a higher value of 72.05 in the Kyphousian variable method. In this way, different hypotheses about the characteristics of these stars caused Hubble’s stress value to vary from 69 to 73.

By combining the aforementioned methods and uncertainties, the average Hubble stress value equal to 69.96 was obtained with an uncertainty of four percent. This margin of error overlaps with the theoretical prediction of the expansion rate of the universe, as well as the higher value of Tim Reiss.

Tensions and resolutions

The James Webb Space Telescope has provided methods for measuring the Hubble constant. The idea is simple: closer galaxies look more massive; Because you can make out some of their stars, while more distant galaxies have a more uniform appearance.

A method called gravitational convergence is more promising. A massive galaxy cluster acts like a magnifying glass, bending and magnifying the image of a background object, creating multiple images of the background object when its light takes different paths.

Brenda Fry, an astronomer at the University of Arizona, is leading a program to observe seven clusters with the James Webb Space Telescope. Looking at the first images they captured last year of the G165 cluster, Fry and his colleagues noticed three spots that were not previously seen in the images. These three points were actually separate images of a supernova that was located in the background of the aforementioned cluster.

After repeating the observation several times, the researchers calculated the difference between the arrival times of the three gravitational lensing images of the supernova. This time delay is proportional to Hubble’s constant and can be used to calculate this value. The group obtained an expansion velocity of 75.4 km/s/Mpa with a large uncertainty of 8.1%. Fry expects the error bars to correct after several years of similar measurements.

Both Friedman’s and Reiss’ teams predict that they will be able to get a better answer with James Webb’s observations in the coming years. “With improved data, the Hubble tension will eventually be resolved, and I think we’ll get to the bottom of it very quickly,” Friedman says.

Continue Reading

Popular