Space
What is a nebula? Everything you need to know about it
Published
1 month agoon
What is a nebula? Everything you need to know about it
Nebula is a Latin word meaning “cloud”. When telescopes were not as powerful as they are today, the term nebula included other objects, including galaxies such as the neighboring Andromeda, and was often referred to as the “Andromeda Nebula”.
However, the advantage of current telescopes is that galaxies are not just cloud structures, as previously thought, but are made up of billions of stars. Today, the term nebula is used for clouds of gas and dust inside galaxies.
-
What is a nebula?
-
What are nebulae made of?
-
Types of nebula
-
Star births
-
Planetary nebula
-
Supernova remnants
-
dark nebula
-
Composite nebula
-
Nebula discoveries
-
Famous nebulae
-
Horseshoe Nebula
-
Eagle Nebula
-
Southern Ring Nebula
-
curtain nebula
-
Crab Nebula
-
Nebula Karina
-
Orion Nebula
-
God’s Eye Nebula
-
Marsh Nebula
-
Horsehead Nebula
-
summary
What is a nebula?
A nebula is a huge cloud of gas and interstellar dust that plays an important role in the life cycle of stars. Nebulas come in various shapes and sizes and create fascinating cosmic vistas. These objects have different compositions based on how and where they are formed.
Most of the nebulae are very large and sometimes their diameter reaches hundreds of light years. Many of the fascinating images of the Hubble and James Webb telescopes are of nebulae, such as the “Pillars of Creation”.
The James Webb Telescope captured this image, known as “Cosmic Rocks,” from the stellar nursery region of the Carina Nebula.
What are nebulae made of?
Nebulas are usually known for their beautiful and eye-catching designs, which are made of a variety of interstellar materials. These clouds made of gas, dust, and plasma are remnants of stellar processes such as hydrogen fusion in stars, stellar winds, and supernova explosions.
The composition of nebulae varies according to their age, position, and other physical conditions. For example, some nebulae may be dominated by hydrogen, while others may contain large amounts of helium, carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. Also, the gas and dust inside the nebulae can be ionized, in such a way that it loses or gains a large amount of electrons, and this process leads to the emission of light in different wavelengths and the production of different colors and patterns in the nebulae.
In general, the composition and structure of nebulae is an attractive research topic in the fields of astrophysics and astronomy; Because they contain important clues about the history and evolution of the world.
This stunning image of the region of gas and stellar dust known as the “Pillars of Creation” in the Eagle Nebula was captured by the James Webb Space Telescope.
Types of nebula
There are different types of nebulae based on how they are formed and composed. Most nebulae are composed mainly of gas, which contributes to their glow and colorful display. However, there are other nebulae that do not have a high brightness due to the dusty composition.
Star births
Hubble Space Telescope image of emission nebula NGC 2174
Star birth nebulae are divided into two main categories. Reflection nebulae and diffusion nebulae. A reflection nebula is a stellar nursery that reflects light instead of emitting light. A reflection nebula can emit light, however its density usually prevents light from escaping into space. This type of nebula actually reflects the light of nearby stars. Because a reflection nebula reflects light instead of emitting it, its composition is hard to guess. When astronomers create a spectrum of a reflection nebula, the spectrum reveals the composition of the reflected light and thus the composition of objects near the nebula. By looking at the color of the nebula, you can see that it is reflective. These nebulae usually emit blue light and most of them are blue in color.
Emissive nebulae are the exact opposite of their reflective counterparts. These nebulae are often the place where stars are born, and the amount of energy released by the stars being born causes the atoms inside the nebula to ionize. High-energy photons collide with nearby atoms, causing electrons to jump to a higher energy level. When the electrons return to their original energy level, they release their stored energy in the form of photons and emit light. Therefore emission nebulae can produce their own light. For this reason, astronomers can accurately reveal the composition of emission nebulae using spectroscopic methods. A diffusion nebula can also be identified based on its color. Excited hydrogen atoms usually cause the red color of these nebulae.
Planetary nebula
Cat’s Eye Planetary Nebula
Some nebulae are the result of the end of life of stars that have released their material into space. The remnant nebulae of stars are divided into two categories: planetary nebulae and supernova nebulae.
Every star begins its life with the gravitational collapse of a cloud of hydrogen gas. As the masses of hydrogen accumulate and form huge clouds, the temperature of hydrogen increases. By establishing the conditions for the fusion of the hydrogen nucleus into the helium nucleus, the process of star birth begins. With the occurrence of hydrogen fusion in the core of the star, the energy produced is opposite to the star’s gravity, and in this way, a state of equilibrium is established in the star. However, all stars have a limited supply of hydrogen. Eventually, the star’s energy source runs out. If the star is similar to our sun, the depletion of the hydrogen source leads to the formation of helium in the core of the star.
When the conditions for helium fusion are not possible, the star’s gravity will prevail and the star’s collapse process will begin. As the star collapses, its temperature and density increase. Thus, the star converts helium into heavier elements such as carbon and oxygen.
As the heavier elements burn, the core’s energy overcomes the star’s gravity. The star expands beyond its original size. As the star grows, its surface heat spreads over a larger area. The result of this process is the gradual cooling of the outer layers of the star and its red color. At this stage, the star turns into a so-called red giant. This process of contraction and expansion occurs several times until different atoms are formed and burn in the core of the star. As the star expands beyond its original size, its mass decreases. As the star expands further, its gravity becomes weaker and is no longer able to maintain the star’s components. The outer layers of the star gradually evaporate. Eventually, the star loses most of its material, leaving only a shell of stellar material that becomes a planetary nebula.
Supernova remnants
The Crab Nebula is a type of supernova remnant.
Massive stars die differently than low-mass stars. Since the mass of these stars is very high, the gravitational collapse of the star will be more intense and lead to the composition of heavier elements. When iron forms in the core of a massive star, its fate is decided. Although most massive stars can convert iron into heavier elements, the energy absorbed in the iron fusion process is much greater than the energy released.
Thus, the star’s gravity takes full control and its final collapse becomes inevitable. In this way, the pressures of the nucleus increase so much that the atoms are compressed together and even the electrons and protons are mixed together to form neutrons. In this way, the core of the star is made entirely of neutrons and forms a neutron star . The collapse of the outer layers affects the forming neutron star and it explodes in a huge explosion called a supernova. The energy released from such an explosion can outshine all the surrounding stars in the galaxy. In this way, the material of the star is ejected into space and forms the remnants of the supernova.
Dark nebula
The Coal Bag Nebula is a dark nebula in the constellation of the Southern Cross.
A dark nebula is a cloud of gas and dust that is revealed by bright regions of stellar material and background stars. The nebula appears as a shadow against the bright background, forming fascinating shapes and structures.
There are also opaque nebulae that do not emit visible light and do not have a bright background but block their own background light. Dark nebulae, like reflective and emission nebulae, are sources of infrared rays due to their dust.
Among the dark nebulae, we can refer to the Horsehead Nebula and the CoalSack Nebula. These nebulae consist of thick clouds of dust and block the light of the gases behind them.
Composite nebula
A trifid nebula is a typical example of a composite nebula.
Some objects in the night sky are a combination of nebulae. The trifid nebula is a typical example of a composite nebula. This nebula consists of a diffusion nebula, a reflection nebula, and a dark nebula and has a unique and complex structure.
Nebula discoveries
In 1610, Nicolas-Claude Fabry de Piresque discovered the Orion Nebula using a telescope. This nebula was also observed by Johann Baptist Sisat in 1618. However, Christian Huygens was the first person to make a detailed study of the Orion Nebula in 1659.
In 1715, Edmund Halley published a list of six nebulae. This number gradually increased during the same century, until Jean-Philippe de Chazo presented a list of 20 in 1756. Nicolas Louis de Lacay published a list of 42 nebulae, most of which were unknown. Charles Messier published a list of 103 nebulae in 1781, which are known today as Messier’s objects.
The number of nebulae increased dramatically thanks to the efforts of William Herschel and his sister Caroline Herschel. Their Millennium Catalog entitled New Nebulae and Star Clusters was published in 1786. The second thousand-year catalog was published in 1789 and the third catalog with number 510 Sahabhi was published in 1802. During his research, William Herschel believed these nebulae are unresolved star clusters. However, in 1790 he discovered a star surrounded by a nebula and concluded that the discovered dust structure was real, not just a distant star.
In 1864, William Huggins made a spectral study of 70 nebulae. He found that a third of the nebulae have the emission spectrum of a gas. The rest showed continuous spectra and were thought to be composed of stellar mass. The third category was published in 1912 by Westo Silver.
In 1923, after much debate, it became clear that many nebulae were actually galaxies further away than the Milky Way. Silver and Hubble continued to collect spectra of various nebulae and discovered 29 nebulae with emission spectra and 33 nebulae with starlight spectra.
Famous nebulae
There are countless beautiful and well-known nebulae in the world. In this section, we introduce a short list of famous nebulae that have been the subjects of huge telescopes such as the Hubble Space Telescope and the James Webb Space Telescope.
Horseshoe Nebula
VLT telescope image of the Horseshoe Nebula
The Horseshoe Nebula, also known as the Swan Nebula and the Omega Nebula, is located in the constellation Sagittarius. Philippe Louis Louis de Chazo discovered this nebula in 1745 and Charles Messier classified it in 1764. This nebula is between 5000 and 6000 light-years away from Earth and has a diameter of 15 light-years. Horseshoe is one of the brightest and heaviest star formation regions in the Milky Way galaxy.
Eagle Nebula
Three-color composite image of the Eagle Nebula
The Eagle Nebula, or Messier 16, is a young cluster of stars located in the constellation Serpent and was discovered by Jean-Philippe de Chezo in 1745. This nebula contains several active gas and dust regions of star birth, including the famous Pillars of Creation region. The distance between the Eagle Nebula and the Earth is 5700 light years.
Southern Ring Nebula
James Webb Space Telescope near-infrared image of the Southern Ring Nebula
The Southern Ring Nebula, or NGC 3132, is a famous and bright planetary nebula in the constellation Sails. The distance of this nebula from the Earth is approximately 2000 light years, and for this reason, researchers have conducted many studies on it. The Southern Ring Nebula was one of the objects selected for observation by the James Webb Space Telescope at the time of its inception.
Images of the Southern Ring Nebula show two stars close to each other. The central star of this nebula is a white dwarf planet. The bright and hot central star is an A-type main sequence star that is at least 1,277 AU away from the white dwarf.
Curtain nebula
The curtain nebula is a cloud of ionized and hot gas and dust.
The Veil Nebula is a cloud of ionized and hot gas and dust located in the constellation of Pisces. The distance of this supernova remnant nebula from Earth reaches 2400 light years and a large part of it is made up of oxygen, sulfur, and hydrogen. William Herschel discovered this nebula in 1784.
Crab Nebula
The Liverpool Telescope has released this HaRGB image of the Crab Nebula.
The Crab Nebula is like the Veil Nebula of supernova remnants. This nebula is located in the constellation Taurus, at a distance of 6500 light years from Earth. The diameter of this nebula is 11 light years and in its center is a pulsar, a type of neutron star with a diameter of 28 to 30 km and a rotation speed of 30 times per second.
Nebula Karina
Part of the Carina Nebula
Carina Nebula is a type of diffusion nebula that contains a huge and complex region of dark and bright dust in the constellation of Shahtakhteh. This nebula is approximately 8500 light years away from Earth. The Carina Nebula was one of the five objects selected for initial observations by the James Webb Telescope. The James Webb telescope captured a detailed image of the star-forming region known as cosmic rocks.
Orion Nebula
Combined image of the Orion Nebula obtained from two infrared and visible light images of the Hubble Space Telescope in 2006.
The Orion Emission Nebula or Orion, also known as Messier 42 or NGC 1976, is located in the Milky Way galaxy and the Orion constellation. The Orion is one of the brightest nebulae that can be seen with the naked eye at magnitude 4 in the night sky. Orion is also the closest star-forming region to Earth. The length of this nebula reaches 24 light years and it is 1344 light years away from Earth.
God’s Eye Nebula
God’s Eye Nebula from the Hubble Space Telescope
The Eye of God planetary nebula, also known as the Helix and the Spiral Nebula, is located 650 light-years from Earth in the constellation of Aquarius. This nebula is the result of a medium-to-low-mass star that has ejected its outer layers into space at the end of its life. The gasses of the star form an eye-like structure. The central stellar core, which is called the central star of the planetary nebula, is a white dwarf.
Marsh Nebula
Marsh Nebula or M8
The Marsh Nebula, also known as Messier 8 and NGC 6523, is a diffusion nebula in the constellation Sagittarius. This nebula is located at a distance between 4000 and 6000 light years from Earth and its dimensions are 110 x 50 light years. This nebula also has a tornado-like structure resulting from an O-type star’s ultraviolet light.
Horsehead Nebula
Horsehead Nebula or Bernard 33
The Horsehead Nebula is a small dark nebula also known as Bernard 33. This nebula, along with its companion Flare Nebula, is located in the constellation Orion and is part of the larger Orion molecular cloud complex. The distance of this nebula to the earth is 1375 light years and its radius is 3.5 light years.
Summary
Nebulas, which are among the brightest and most beautiful cosmic objects, are composed of gas and dust clouds with different compositions. These objects are divided into several main groups based on their composition, which include: stellar birth nebula (emission and reflection nebula), planetary nebula, supernova remnant nebula and dark nebula. These objects have been observed with telescopes for centuries, and today Hubble and James Webb space telescopes record amazing and detailed images of them.
You may like
-
Why is Jupiter not a star due to its large size?
-
Why doesn’t Jupiter have big and bright rings like Saturn?
-
Why do none of the moons of the solar system have rings?
-
Most alien planets probably do not have day or night
-
The biography of Edwin Hubble
-
Can telescopes see astronaut footprints on the moon?
Why is Jupiter not a star due to its large size?
The smallest known main-sequence star in the Milky Way is a red dwarf called EBLM J0555-57Ab, located 600 light-years from Earth. With an average radius of nearly 59,000 kilometers, this star is only slightly larger than the planet Saturn. Therefore, this red dwarf is the smallest known star that has hydrogen fusion in its core; The process that provides the star’s energy to burn until the end of its life.
In the solar system, there are two objects bigger than the mentioned star. One of them is the sun; But the other is the planet Jupiter , whose radius reaches 69,911 kilometers; But why is Jupiter a planet and not a star according to these dimensions?
The answer to the above question is simple: Jupiter does not have enough mass to support the hydrogen-to-helium fusion process. The star EBLM J0555-57Ab is nearly 85 times more massive than Jupiter. If this star was a little lighter, it would not be able to perform the hydrogen fusion process; But if the solar system had a different structure, would it be possible for the planet Jupiter to shine as a star?
Jupiter and the Sun are more similar than you might think
Jupiter may not be a star, but it has a huge influence on the solar system. The mass of this gas giant is 2.5 times the total mass of other planets in the solar system. On the other hand, Jupiter has a low density of 1.33 grams per cubic centimeter. While the density of the Earth is close to 5.51 grams per cubic centimeter, which is four times more than the density of Jupiter.
But it is interesting to point out the similarities between Jupiter and the Sun. The density of the sun is 1.41 grams per cubic centimeter. These two crimes are also very similar in composition. In terms of mass, nearly 71% of the sun is made up of hydrogen and 21% of it is made up of helium, and traces of other elements can be seen in it. On the other hand, 73% of Jupiter is made of hydrogen and 24% of it is made of helium.
Illustration of the planet Jupiter and its moon Io
For the above reasons, Jupiter is sometimes called a failed star; But again, Jupiter is unlikely to even come close to being a star. Stars and planets form in two completely different mechanisms. Stars form when a dense knot of matter in an interstellar molecular cloud collapses under its own gravity. This material begins to rotate in a process called cloud collapse. As rotation continues, more material from the surrounding cloud enters the stellar accretion disk.
With the increase in mass and as a result of gravity, the core of the baby star becomes more and more compact, which causes the temperature to increase and make it hotter. Finally, this mass becomes so compressed and hot that its core ignites and the process of thermonuclear fusion begins.
Based on our understanding of the star formation process, when a star runs out of accretion material, a full portion of its accretion disk remains. Planets form from this residue. According to astronomers, for gas giants like Jupiter, this process, called accretion, begins with small clumps of icy rocks and dust in the disk. With the rotation of these materials around the baby star, their density starts gradually and they stick to each other with the force of static electricity. Finally, these growing masses reach the size of nearly 10 times the mass of the earth; So that they can gravitationally absorb more gases from the surrounding disk.
From this stage, the gradual growth of the customer and its current mass began. The current mass of Jupiter is 318 times the mass of the Earth and 0.001 times the mass of the Sun. When a gas giant absorbs all its available matter, its growth stops. As a result, Jupiter has never even approached the mass of a star. The reason why Jupiter’s composition is similar to the Sun is not that it is a failed star; Rather, the reason for being born in the molecular gas cloud is the same as the sun.
Real failed stars
There are different groups of objects that can be classified as failed stars. These objects are called brown dwarfs and can fill the gap between gas giants and stars. The mass of brown dwarfs starts at 13 times the mass of Jupiter. These objects are heavy enough to support nuclear fusion, but this fusion is not of ordinary hydrogen but of deuterium or heavy hydrogen. Deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen that has one proton and one neutron in its nucleus instead of just one proton. The temperature and pressure of deuterium fusion is lower than the temperature and pressure of hydrogen fusion.
Since deuterium fusion occurs at lower mass, temperature and pressure, it is one of the steps to reach hydrogen fusion for stars whose accretion process continues and absorb the surrounding mass; But some objects never reach the required mass for hydrogen fusion.
Shortly after the discovery of brown dwarfs in 1995, these objects were called failed stars or ambitious planets, but numerous studies show that the formation of these objects like stars was from cloud collapse, not core accumulation; Some brown dwarfs do not even have enough mass to fuse deuterium, making them difficult to distinguish from planets.
Jupiter has exactly the lower mass limit for cloud collapse; The minimum mass required for cloud collapse is approximately equal to the mass of the planet Jupiter. As a result, if the planet Jupiter was formed from the collapse of a cloud, we could place it in the group of failed stars; But data from NASA’s Juno probe suggests that Jupiter at least once had a solid core, which is more consistent with the theory of core formation.
Modeling shows that the upper limit of planetary mass and formation by core accretion method is less than 10 times the mass of Jupiter. As a result, the planet Jupiter is not included in the group of failed stars; But by thinking about the cause of this issue, we can get a better understanding of how the universe works. In addition, the planet Jupiter has a stormy, striped and twisted appearance, and the existence of humans would probably not be possible without this gas giant.
Space
Why doesn’t Jupiter have big and bright rings like Saturn?
Published
6 hours agoon
20/09/2024Why doesn’t Jupiter have big and bright rings like Saturn?
Considering the similarity of the planet Jupiter to its neighbor Saturn, it is natural to ask why this planet does not have clear and bright rings like Saturn. However, Jupiter has thin, narrow rings made up of dust that only shine when there is sunlight in the background. According to new research, these narrow rings lack brightness because the large Galilean moons prevent rocks and dust from accumulating around Jupiter. According to Stephen Kane, an astrophysicist at the University of California Riverside:
The fact that Jupiter doesn’t have brighter rings than Saturn has bothered me for a long time. If Jupiter had such rings, it would certainly appear brighter to us because this planet is much closer to Earth than Saturn.
Keen and his colleague Zhixing Li, an astrophysicist at Riverside University, ran a series of simulations of objects orbiting Jupiter to test the hypothesis of a giant ring system around Jupiter at some point in history. The aforementioned simulations considered the orbital motion of Jupiter and its four largest moons, known as the Galilean moons, which are: Ganymede (which is even larger than Mercury and is known as the largest moon in the solar system), Callisto, Io, and Europa. The researchers also included enough time for the formation of a ring system in their simulations. According to this modeling, Jupiter has not even had rings similar to Saturn in the past and is unlikely to have them in the future. Kane explains:
Giant and heavy planets have heavy moons and these moons prevent the formation of rings of matter. The Galilean moons of Jupiter, one of the largest in the Solar System, would quickly destroy any potential large rings that might be forming.
Jupiter has narrow rings, most of which are dust from moons and material that may have been thrown into space by impact events. On the other hand, much of Saturn’s rings are made up of ice, possibly fragments of comets, asteroids, or icy moons that have been broken apart by Saturn’s gravity.
We know that Saturn’s moons play a vital role in the formation and maintenance of its rings, But one or more large moons can also gravitationally disrupt the rings and drive the ice out of the planetary orbit and into an unknown region. Although most people think that Saturn is the only planet with rings, rings around planets are very common even in the solar system. For example, in addition to Jupiter, the solar system’s ice giants Uranus and Neptune both have narrow rings of gas and dust.
Compared to other planets, Uranus has a strong axial deviation and its orbital axis is parallel to the orbital plane. The position of the rings of this planet is adjusted accordingly. Probably, a mass collided with Uranus and led to its axial deviation, or possibly this planet once had huge rings that caused this deviation. Of course, rings are not limited to planets. A small body with a width of 230 km called Chariklo, which is located in the orbit between Jupiter and Uranus, also has rings.
Also, the dwarf planet Haumea in the Kuiper belt has a ring. Simulations show that rings around ice masses are common due to the gravitational interaction and removal of ice from these masses.
Mars is also likely to be ringed in the future. The moon of Mars, Phobos, comes a little closer to this planet every year. Over the next hundred million years, the moon will come close enough to Mars that the planet’s gravity will break it apart, forming a short-lived ring that may recondense into a moon. Even Saturn’s rings may be temporary and rain down on the planet in the future. If we can study the rings in great detail, we can use them to fit together the puzzle pieces of planetary history. Kane believes:
To us astronomers, the rings are like bloodstains on a crime scene wall. When we look at the rings of the giant planets, we find evidence of the events that caused this material to accumulate.
Anyway, now that Jupiter has no spectacular rings, let’s enjoy Saturn’s rings. The Planetary Science Journal has accepted this research and is available on the arXiv database.
Why do none of the moons of the solar system have rings?
We have many strange moons in our solar system. hot and cold moons; Moons with liquids and dusty moons. One lunar planet is walnut-shaped and another is potato-shaped; But among almost 300 moons that have been discovered so far, not even one of them has rings. This is really strange.
Of the eight planets in the solar system, half have rings of dust and ice that orbit their equator. It is thought that Mars once had a ring, and according to new research, even our blue planet probably had a ring similar to Saturn’s ring about 500 million years ago, which lasted for tens of millions of years.
In addition, some dwarf planets also have rings; Although astronomers have not yet been able to understand how these rings are formed. Even some asteroids have their own rings.
While investigating the concept of ringed moons outside our solar system, Mario Socercchia, an astrophysicist at the Universidad Adolfo Ibánez in Chile, and his colleagues became involved in the question of why moons in our own cosmic neighborhood lack rings. In an interview with Science Alert, he explains:
If the giant planets of the solar system have rings, and if the asteroids beyond the orbit of Jupiter and the non-Neptunian bodies also have rings, why don’t the moons of the solar system have rings? This absence is illogical considering the presence of rings in other places. As a result, it is better to investigate whether there are underlying dynamical reasons that prevent the formation of rings or their long-term stability around moons.
James Webb Space Telescope image of the rings of the planet Uranus.
We have yet to definitively discover an extrasolar moon, but in 2021 Soserkia and his colleagues hypothesized that if a moon had a large ring system, it could engineer its existence by blocking enough starlight. But the group later realized that we have yet to see any ringed moons, so the likelihood of their existence is very low.
When you’re an astronomer with a question in mind and a simulation tool at hand, there’s only one thing you can do: build models of cosmic systems and see what happens when you set them in motion.
There are many raw materials from which rings can form around the moons of the solar system. Some of these materials are dust resulting from the formation of impact craters. Some other moons emit steam or gas of their own, so there seems to be no problem with ring formation.
Considering the gravitational influence of the moon, host planet and other moons, researchers designed and tested physical N simulations and realized that due to these variables, ring formation around moons is difficult.
For example, Saturn’s moon Enceladus releases water vapor, ice particles, and gases from its glaciers in the Antarctic region with its remarkable surface activity. However, instead of forming a ring around this moon, these materials are transported into Saturn’s orbit by strong interactions with neighboring moons, feeding Saturn’s E ring.
In other words, even though the moons produce part of the raw materials necessary for the ring, their surrounding environment makes a large part of these materials available to the host planet and prevents the formation of the ring around the moons themselves.
So far, NASA has discovered 293 moons in the orbit of the planets of the solar system, most of which belong to the planets Jupiter and Saturn. Also, moons around dwarf planets and even asteroids have been discovered.
Soserkia and his team simulated the moons of a variety of solar system objects, from the Earth’s moon to the larger moons of Jupiter and Saturn, over millions of years of evolution. They sought to investigate the stability of these objects, their gravitational environment, possible ring systems, and their changes over time. The results of the investigation were contrary to the expectations of the researchers. Susarkia explains about this:
At first I expected rings to be completely unstable, which directly answered our question. However, contrary to expectation, we found that these structures have maintained their stability in many conditions. Indeed, in a previous paper we showed that isolated moons can have stable rings, but we did not predict that moons would remain stable in harsh gravitational environments despite the large number of other moons and planets that have distributed their rings. Another surprise came when we realized that these harsh environments, instead of destroying the rings, beautified them by creating structures like cracks and waves, which were just like what we see in Saturn’s rings.
Saturn’s moon Iapetus with its prominent equatorial ridge.
Some features of the moons of the solar system are signs of the past of the rings. The simulations suggest that the pebbles found orbiting Saturn’s moon Rhea could be the last remnants of a complete ring system. Also, Saturn’s moon Iaptus has a equatorial groove, which could be the remnant of a ring that fell on this moon, and in this sense, it is just like Saturn’s rings that slowly fall on this gas giant.
The findings show that the reason we do not see rings in the solar system today is that we are not in the right time and place. Solar radiation pressure, magnetic fields, internal heating, and magnetospheric plasma all contribute to the loss of once-existing lunar rings. According to Susarkia:
I believe we are unlucky to some extent; Because we started observing the universe during a period when these structures no longer exist. After doing this research, I was convinced that these rings probably existed in the past.
On the other hand, the only reason we see Saturn’s rings is because we are in the right place and time. For this reason, we see solar and lunar eclipses; Because the moon is gradually moving away from the earth and at some point it will be so far that it can no longer completely cover the sun.
The glory of Saturn’s rings.
The researchers believe that further simulations that take into account more parameters, such as beam pressure and magnetic fields, can help us understand the absence of lunar rings in more detail. We should also look more closely at the moons and look for evidence of the past, such as the craters on Iaptus.
At the same time, Suserkia and his colleagues are looking to expand their search and look for moons of rings around alien extrasolar worlds. He explains:
I wonder what mythical and epic stories we will hear from the inhabitants of other worlds about ringed moons. I mean, how will their stories and culture about the moons of the rings be different from our stories? There are infinite possibilities.
The scientists’ research has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics and is available in the archive database.
Why is Jupiter not a star due to its large size?
Why doesn’t Jupiter have big and bright rings like Saturn?
Why do none of the moons of the solar system have rings?
The biography of Andy Rubin, the creator of Android
How to prevent your location from being revealed through photos?
How to use iMessage on Android?
Xiaomi Glorimi M2 Max watch review; Alternative economic option for iPhone owners
Ten strange moons of the solar system
Can coffee consumption cause weight loss?
Why do we humans sleep?
Popular
-
Technology1 year ago
Who has checked our Whatsapp profile viewed my Whatsapp August 2023
-
Technology1 year ago
Second WhatsApp , how to install and download dual WhatsApp August 2023
-
Technology1 year ago
How to use ChatGPT on Android and iOS
-
AI2 years ago
Uber replaces human drivers with robots
-
Technology1 year ago
The best Android tablets 2023, buying guide
-
Technology1 year ago
The best photography cameras 2023, buying guide and price
-
Humans2 years ago
Cell Rover analyzes the inside of cells without destroying them
-
Technology1 year ago
How to prevent automatic download of applications on Samsung phones