Connect with us

Space

The planet Mercury; Everything you need to know about the closest world to the Sun

Published

on

Mercury
Mercury is the smallest and fastest planet in the solar system. One of the reasons for the unique features of this planet is its close distance to the Sun.

Mercury; Everything you need to know about the closest world to the Sun

Mercury is the closest planet to the sun and the smallest planet in the entire solar system. This small, hollow planet has no moons and orbits the Sun faster than any other body. After Earth, Mercury has the highest density in the solar system and the diameter of its huge metallic core is between 3,600 and 3,800 km or 75% of the diameter of the entire planet. In contrast, the thickness of the outer shell of Mercury reaches 500 to 600 meters. The heavy core and composition of this planet, which contains a large amount of volatile elements, has become a puzzling mystery to scientists.

Table of Contents
  • What does the planet Mercury symbolize?
  • How was the planet Mercury formed?
  • What is mercury made of?
  • Features of Mercury
  • Interesting facts about the planet Mercury
  • The largest temperature fluctuation in the entire solar system
  • The smallest planet in the solar system
  • Survivor of a massive asteroid impact
  • The strange orbit of Mercury
  • Polar ice cover
  • Huge iron core
  • The entire surface of Mercury has been mapped
  • The thinnest atmosphere in the entire solar system
  • Magnetic tornadoes
  • Transit of Mercury in front of the Sun
  • Discoveries of Mercury
  • Journey to Mercury
  • Mariner 10; The first mission to Mercury
  • The MESSENGER spacecraft: a new view of Mercury
  • Conclusion

What does the planet Mercury symbolize?

The name Mercury is derived from the name of the Roman god Mercury, the speedy messenger of the gods, and the Roman counterpart of Hermes, the Greek god. Since Mercury revolves around the Sun at a high speed and a Mercury year is less than three Earth months, the ancient Romans chose this name for Mercury.

Mariner 10 image of MercuryThe Mariner 10 probe captured this image of the planet Mercury.

How was the planet Mercury formed?

Years after the beginning of the space age, there is still much debate about how planets formed, and scientists are still not sure how they formed. The first and most important accepted theory is the core accretion theory, which is close to reality in the case of rocky planets like Mercury. The second theory, disk instability, applies to gas planets.

Approximately 6.4 billion years ago, the solar system was a cloud of gas and dust called the solar nebula. Gravity led to the collapse of materials and their rapid rotation. Thus, the sun was formed in the center of this nebula. With the formation of the sun, the rest of the material condensed. The smaller particles joined each other due to the force of gravity and turned into larger particles. The solar wind swept away the lighter particles, leaving only the heavy, rocky material near the Sun to form rocky planets like Mercury.

Like Earth, Mercury’s metallic core formed first, and then lighter elements formed its mantle and crust. Based on the observations of outer planets, the theory of core accumulation can be considered the dominant theory of the formation of rocky planets. One of the most accepted theories about the formation of Mercury is that in the early history of the solar system, an asteroid with 1/6 the mass of Mercury and a diameter of several thousand kilometers collided with it. has done. This collision has removed much of Mercury’s crust and mantle, leaving its core as the main element. A similar process known as the massive impact hypothesis has been proposed for the formation of the moon.

According to another theory, before the Sun’s energy output stabilized early in its life, the planet Mercury probably formed from the solar nebula. In the beginning, the mass of the planet Mercury was twice the current mass, but due to the high temperatures of the early sun, a large part of the surface rocks of Mercury evaporated and formed an atmosphere of rock vapor, which was also washed away by the solar wind.

What is mercury made of?

Much of Mercury is made of iron. This planet has an inner core and a liquid metallic outer core, which are inside the mantle and crust like Earth. Mercury’s inner core is solid and similar in size to Earth’s core.

Also, instead of having a complete atmosphere, Mercury has an exosphere, which forms a very thin layer. Mercury’s exosphere is formed by solar winds and atoms from asteroid collisions. This thin atmosphere cannot protect Mercury well from cosmic collisions, that’s why Mercury is very similar to Earth’s moon and is full of impact craters.

Mercury has a solid silicate crust and a rocky mantle. The outer layer of Mercury’s core is composed of liquid iron sulfide that surrounds the solid inner core. Mercury is the second most dense planet in the solar system after Earth. The density of Mercury can be used to find out the details of its internal structure.

Mercury

Internal structure and magnetosphere of the planet Mercury

Features of Mercury

A year of Mercury is equal to 88 days and a day is 59 Earth days. This planet rotates slowly around its axis but has the highest speed in the orbit of the Sun.

The surface of Mercury is similar to the surface of Earth’s moon, it is full of impact craters due to asteroid bombardment early in the formation of the solar system. Mercury’s craters and surface features are named after famous artists, musicians, and writers, such as Dr. Seuss, famous children’s author, and dancer Alvin Alley.

Very large impact basins such as Caloris with a diameter of 1550 km and Rakhmaninov with a diameter of 306 km were created by asteroid collisions in the early formation of the solar system. Although there are many flat lands on Mercury, some craters are hundreds of kilometers high. These rocks were formed when the interior of Mercury cooled and compressed over several billion years.

Mercury is continuously contracting

Much of Mercury’s surface appears grayish-brown in color. Also, bright bands called “crater rays” can be seen on the surface of this planet. These streaks were formed when an asteroid or comet hit the surface of Mercury.

Approximately 4 billion years ago, an asteroid 100 km across collided with Mercury. The power of this collision was equal to one trillion megatons of bombs. As a result of this collision, a large crater with a diameter of 1,550 km was created, which is called Kaluris Basin today. The width of this crater is the size of the state of Texas. As a result of another collision, the rotation axis of this planet was deviated.

Calris basinA mosaic image of the Calris basin

Mercury has not only shrunk in the past; Rather, its contraction continues today. This small planet is made up of a plate that covers its iron core. This core is cooling, and as it cools, the volume of the planet also decreases. This process has led to the crumpling of the planet’s surface and has created clot-like rocks and valleys.

Interesting facts about the planet Mercury

The largest temperature fluctuation in the entire solar system

Although Mercury is the closest planet to the Sun, its surface can get very cold due to the lack of an atmosphere to trap heat. The temperature of this planet exceeds 430 degrees Celsius during the day, but it can reach minus 180 degrees Celsius during the night. Thus, with a temperature difference of 600 degrees Celsius, Mercury has the largest temperature fluctuation in the entire solar system.

The smallest planet in the solar system

Mercury is the smallest planet in the solar system with a diameter of 4876 km and is only slightly larger than the Earth’s moon. Saturn’s moon Titan and Jupiter’s moon Ganymede are both larger than Mercury. Pluto, which was considered the smallest planet in the solar system for many years, was replaced by Mercury after it was removed from the list of planets in the solar system in 2006.

The smallest planet in the solar systemMercury is the smallest planet in the solar system and may be shrinking today.

Survivor of a massive asteroid impact

Due to a lack of atmosphere and proper protection, the planet Mercury was not spared from the impact of asteroids in the early life of the solar system. The surface of this planet, like the moon, is full of impact craters.

The strange orbit of Mercury

Mercury completes the orbit of the Sun once every 88 days, and in other words, it travels 47 kilometers per second. This planet is the fastest planet in the solar system, But Mercury is not only fast but has an elliptical orbit. The distance of this planet to the sun can be close to 47 million kilometers and the farthest distance from the sun is 70 million kilometers.

Polar ice cover

In 2012, NASA’s MESSENGER probe discovered water ice inside Mercury’s impact craters. In 2017, it was confirmed that Mercury has more ice cover in its northern polar regions. The hypothesis of the presence of ice on Mercury was first proposed in the 1990s by observing reflective regions near the poles from ground-based telescopes.

Considering the close distance of Mercury to the Sun, the existence of ice on its surface seems strange; But this planet has a slight axial deviation, which causes its polar regions to receive a little sunlight directly, and some impact craters are also plunged into complete darkness.

Mercury's polar ice capMercury’s polar ice cap is shown in yellow.

Huge iron core

Mercury has a huge iron core with a diameter of 3,600 to 3,800 km, which makes up nearly 75% of the planet’s diameter. In fact, the outer layer of Mercury is only 500 to 600 km thick. Much of Mercury’s core is made of iron, and scientists aren’t sure how it formed.

The entire surface of Mercury has been mapped

NASA’s MESSENGER probe orbited Mercury for more than four years and captured amazing images of it. Scientists used these images to create the first complete map of Mercury’s surface.

The thinnest atmosphere in the entire solar system

Mercury has the thinnest atmosphere among the planets of the solar system. Mercury’s atmosphere is so thin that scientists have named it the exosphere. Mercury’s exosphere is mostly composed of oxygen, sodium, hydrogen, helium, and potassium.

Magnetic tornadoes

Scientists were surprised by Mercury’s strange magnetic field. The planet is too small to host a global magnetic field. Although its magnetic field is only one percent of the strength of Earth’s magnetic field, magnetic tornadoes are common there.

Mercury’s magnetic field interacts with the solar wind, and this process results in the generation of very fast magnetic tornadoes from the solar wind plasma. When the plasma of the solar wind hits the surface of Mercury, the neutral charge atoms are moved on the surface and transferred to the atmosphere of Mercury.

Transit of Mercury in front of the Sun

The transit of Mercury in front of the Sun occurs when this planet passes directly between the Sun and the planet in front of it and the solar disk appears opposite. During the transit, Mercury is seen as a small black dot that passes in front of the large orange disk of the Sun.

The transit of Mercury in comparison with the Earth happens more often than its transit in comparison with the planet Venus and it is repeated 13 or 14 times in every century. Mercury’s transit in front of the Sun usually occurs in May or November. Previous transits have occurred on these dates: November 15, 1999, May 7, 2003, November 8, 2006, May 9, 2016, November 11, 2019, and the next transit will be November 13, 2032. A typical transition lasts only a few hours. On June 3, 2014, the Curiosity rover observed the transit of Mercury in front of the Sun, marking the first time that a planetary transit has been observed from a planet other than Earth.

Discoveries of Mercury

The oldest recorded records related to the observation of Mercury can be seen in the MUL.APIN tablets. These observations were probably made by Assyrian astronomers around the 14th century BC. Babylonian records of observing Mercury go back to the first millennium BC.

The first telescopic observations of Mercury were made by Thomas Heriot and Galileo in 1610. In 1612, Simon Marius noticed the change in brightness of Mercury according to its orbital position. In 1631, Pierre Gassendi made the first telescopic observations of the passage of this planet in front of the Sun, which had been predicted by Johannes Kepler.

Journey to Mercury

Accessing Mercury from Earth had many problems. One of the reasons for this problem was the excessive proximity of this planet to the sun. Spacecraft must have a high initial velocity to enter a Hohmann transfer orbit (an elliptical orbit used to transfer between two circular orbits in the same plane) near Mercury. The rocket fuel needed to travel to Mercury is more than the fuel needed to completely escape from the solar system; As a result, only two probes have managed to visit Mercury so far.

Mariner 10; The first mission to Mercury

Mariner 10 was the first spacecraft to visit Mercury. This spacecraft sent clear images of Mercury to Earth and managed to study the environment and surface of this planet. Mariner 10 was the first spacecraft to visit two planets simultaneously in a single mission. Despite various mechanical problems during this mission, NASA gained a lot of information from this spacecraft; Therefore, Mariner 10 can be considered as the first NASA skill maneuver in which it has become professional today.

Before Mariner 10 launched from Cape Canaveral on November 3, 1973, little was known about the neighbors of our solar system. Mariner 10 visited Venus and Mercury with remarkable speed. Astronomers of that time were curious about the high density of Mercury and the material of its core. According to the hypotheses that NASA had previously proposed, the reason for this high density was the significant concentration of metal in the core of this planet; But questions were also raised about the exact type of core and how Mercury was formed.

Mariner 10 reached Mercury on March 29, 1974. The first images received from Mariner 10 showed a deserted planet with a surface similar to the surface of the Moon, Earth’s moon. Its holes and dry ground were clear in the pictures, But one of the major differences between Mercury and the Moon is the presence of rocks and deep valleys. According to scientists, the crust of Mercury has been wrinkled over time.

The MESSENGER spacecraft: a new view of Mercury

Messenger was the first Mercury orbiter. MESSENGER, short for Mercury Surface Space Environment Geochemistry and Ranging (Mercury Surface, Surrounding Environment, Geological Chemistry, and Ranging) mission, with a weight of 453 kg, investigated the nearest neighbor of the Sun and sent information and images of how the craters formed and its mysterious landscapes. Messenger’s mission ended on April 30, 2015, after the spacecraft ran out of fuel and hit the planet’s surface.

Messenger went hunting for water ice in the poles of Mercury and managed to discover it in the polar parts of this planet. In 2014, using MESSENGER data, researchers uncovered evidence of explosions that occurred on Mercury at different times. Meanwhile, data on water ice in the Brocofio crater near Mercury’s north pole was released in 2014. In the same year, Messenger temporarily went to a height of 100 km above the planet and had a better view of Mercury from this distance.

BepiColombo, a joint mission of the European Space Agency ( ESA ) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency ( JAXA ), is the third exploratory mission to Mercury in the history of the space age. The two orbiters of this probe, the European Mercury Orbiter ( MPO ) and the Japanese Mercury Magnetospheric Orbiter ( MMO ), carry 16 scientific instruments that can answer these questions: Do impact craters in the poles of Mercury really have water ice? Where does Mercury’s magnetic field come from? What are the characteristics of the strange holes on the surface of Mercury?

The BepiColombo probe also captured its first images of Mercury during a low-altitude flyby on October 1, 2021. A total of 9 low-altitude flight maneuvers are planned until 2025.

Conclusion

The planet Mercury is the smallest planet in the solar system and the closest planet to the Sun, which revolves around it at the highest speed. Mercury does not have any moons and due to its close distance to the Sun, it has a thin atmosphere called the exosphere. The orbit of Mercury is elliptical and one year lasts 88 days and one day lasts 59 Earth days. The reason for the long days of Mercury is the slow rotation of this planet around itself. So far, three probes, Mariner, MESSENGER, and BepiColombo, have visited Mercury, but there are still many mysteries about this planet

Space

Dark matter and ordinary matter can interact without gravity!

Published

on

By

dark matter
Dark matter and ordinary matter can interact without gravity! Dark matter, which has five times the mass of normal matter, helps hold galaxies together and explains the puzzling motions of stars. Now a new study has shown that these two substances can interact with each other without the presence of gravity.

Dark matter and ordinary matter can interact without gravity!

Why is dark matter associated with the adjective “dark”? Is it because it harbors some evil forces of the universe or hidden secrets that scientists don’t want us to know? No, it is not. Such fanciful assumptions may sound appealing to a conspiracy theorist, but they are far from the truth.

Dark matter is called dark because it does not interact with light. So when dark matter and light collide, they pass each other. This is also why scientists have not been able to detect dark matter until now; it does not react to light.

Although it has mass and mass creates gravity, this means that dark matter can interact with normal matter and vice versa. Such interactions are rare, and gravity is the only known force that causes these two forms of matter to interact.

However, a new study suggests that dark matter and ordinary matter interact in ways other than gravity.

If this theory is correct, it shows that our existing models of dark matter are somewhat wrong. In addition, it can lead to the development of new and better tools for the detection of dark matter.

Read more: There is more than one way for planets to be born

A new missing link between dark and ordinary matter

Dark matter is believed to have about five times the mass of normal matter in our universe, which helps hold galaxies together and explains some of the motions of stars that don’t make sense based on the presence of visible matter alone.

For example, one of the strongest lines of evidence for the existence of dark matter is the observation of rotation curves in galaxies, which show that stars at the outer edges of spiral galaxies rotate at rates similar to those near the center. These observations indicate the presence of an invisible mass.

Also, for their study, the researchers studied six ultra-dim dwarf (UFD) galaxies located near the Milky Way. However, in terms of their mass, these galaxies have fewer stars than they should. This means they are mostly made up of dark matter.

According to the researchers, if dark matter and normal matter interact only through gravity, the stars in these UFDs should be denser in the centers and more spread out toward the edges of the galaxies. However, if they interact in other ways, the star distribution looks different.

The authors of the study ran computer simulations to investigate both possibilities. When they tested this for all six ultra-dim dwarf (UFD) galaxies, they found that the distribution of stars was uniform, meaning that the stars were spread evenly across the galaxies.

This was in contrast to what is generally observed for gravitational interactions between dark matter and normal matter.

What causes this interaction?

The results of the simulations showed that gravity is not the only force that can make dark matter and normal matter interact. Such an interaction has never been observed before, and it could change our understanding of dark matter and dark energy.

However, this study has a major limitation. What caused the interaction between the two forms of matter is still a mystery. While the current study provides tantalizing hints of a novel interaction, its exact nature and underlying causes remain unknown. Hopefully, further research will clarify the details of such interactions.

This study was published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Continue Reading

Space

James Webb Space Telescope deepens cosmology’s biggest controversy

Published

on

By

James Webb Space Telescope
Despite the published data from the James Webb Telescope of the early universe, the question of the Hubble tension, or discrepancy in measurements of the cosmological constant, has not yet been resolved.

How the James Webb Space Telescope deepens cosmology’s biggest controversy

Summary of the article:

  • Almost a century ago, Edwin Hubble discovered the expansion of the universe and calculated the expansion rate or the cosmic constant.
  • Since Hubble, many groups have tried to measure the expansion rate of the universe. However, the values ​​they obtained differed from the theoretical predictions. This difference is called Hubble tension.
  • Scientists today use three methods to measure the expansion rate of the universe: Cephasian variable stars, TRGB red giant stars, and JAGB asymptotic giants.
  • However, the Hubble tension still exists, indicating that the methods for calculating the Hubble constant suffer from a systematic flaw.
  • Researchers hope to be able to use the James Webb telescope in the coming years to achieve more accurate measurements of the universe’s expansion rate and thus resolve the Hubble tension.

Almost a century ago, Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe was getting bigger. However, today’s measurements of how fast the universe is expanding are contradictory. These discrepancies show that our understanding of the laws of physics may be incomplete. On the other hand, everyone expected the sharp eyes of the James Webb telescope to bring us closer to the answer to the riddle; But a new analysis of the telescope’s long-awaited observations once again reflects inconsistent expansion rates from different types of data, while pointing to possible sources of error.

Two competing groups have led efforts to measure the rate of expansion of the universe, known as Hubble’s constant, or H0. A group led by Adam Reiss of Johns Hopkins University, relying on the known constituents of the universe and the governing equations, has consistently calculated the Hubble constant to be approximately 8 percent higher than the theory predicts the universe’s expansion rate. This discrepancy, known as the Hubble tension, indicates that the model of the cosmological theory may have missed some elements such as raw materials or effects that speed up the expansion of the universe. Such an element can be a clue to a more complete understanding of the world.

This spring, Reiss and his team published new measurements of the Hubble constant based on data from the James Webb Telescope and found a value consistent with their previous estimates. However, a rival group led by Wendy Friedman of the University of Chicago warns that more precise measurements are needed. The team’s measurements of the Hubble constant are closer to the theoretical estimate than Riess’ calculations, suggesting that the Hubble stress may not be real.

Since the commissioning of the James Webb Telescope in 2022, the astrophysical community has been waiting for Friedman’s multidimensional analysis based on telescope observations of three types of stars. The results are now as follows: the two-star types provide estimates of the Hubble constant that are in line with the theoretical prediction; While the results of the third star, which is the same type used by Reiss, are consistent with his team’s higher estimates of Hubble’s constant. According to Friedman, the fact that the results of the three methods are contradictory does not mean that there are unknown physical foundations, but that there are some systematic errors in the calculation methods.

Contradictory world

The difficult part of measuring cosmic expansion is measuring the distance of space objects. In 1912, American astronomer Henrietta Levitt first used pulsating stars known as Cephasian variables to calculate distances. These stars flicker at a rate proportional to their intrinsic luminosity. By understanding the luminosity or radiant power of a Cephasian variable, we can compare it with its apparent brightness or dimming to estimate its galaxy’s distance from us.

Edwin Hubble used Levitt’s method to measure the distances to a set of galaxies hosting the Cephasian variable, and in 1929 he noticed that the galaxies that are farther away from us are moving away faster. This finding meant the expansion of the universe. Hubble calculated the expansion rate to be a constant value of 500 km/s per megaparsec. In other words, two galaxies that are 1 megaparsec or approximately 3.2 million light years apart are moving away from each other at a speed of 500 km/s.

As progress was made in calibrating the relationship between the pulsation frequency of Cepheids and their luminosity, measurements of the Hubble constant improved. However, since the Cephasian variables are very bright, the whole approach used has limitations. Scientists need a new way to measure the distance of galaxies from each other in the infinite space.

In the 1970s, researchers used Cephasian variables to measure the distance to bright supernovae, and in this way they achieved more accurate measurements of the Hubble constant. At that time, as now, two research groups undertook the measurements, and using supernovae and Cephasian variable stars, they achieved contradictory values ​​of 50 km/s per megaparsec and 100 km/s per megaparsec. However, no agreement was reached and everything became completely bipolar.

Edwin Hubble next to the telescopeEdwin Hubble, the American astronomer who discovered the expansion of the universe, stands next to the Schmidt telescope at the Palomar Observatory in this photo from 1949.

The launch of the Hubble Space Telescope in 1990 gave astronomers a new and multi-layered view of the universe. Friedman led a multi-year observing campaign with Hubble, and in 2001 he and his colleagues estimated the expansion rate to be 72 km/s/Mpa with an uncertainty of at most 10%.

A Nobel laureate for the discovery of dark energy, Reiss got into the expansion game a few years later. In 2011, his group found the Hubble constant to be 73 with a three percent uncertainty. Soon after this, cosmologists excelled in another way. In 2013, they used Planck’s observations of light left over from the early universe to determine the exact shape and composition of the early universe.

In the next step, the researchers connected their findings to Einstein’s theory of general relativity and developed a theoretical model to predict the current state of the universe, up to approximately 14 billion years into the future. Based on these calculations, the universe should be expanding at an approximate rate of 67.4 km/s per megaparsec with an uncertainty of less than one percent.

Reese’s team measurement remained at 73, even with the improved accuracy. This higher value indicates that the galaxies today are moving away from each other at a faster rate than theoretically expected. This is how the Hubble tension was born. According to Reiss, today’s Hubble tension shows us that something is missing in the cosmological model.

The missing factor could be the first new element in the universe to be discovered since dark energy. Theorists still have doubts about the identity of this agent. Perhaps this force is some kind of repulsive energy that lasted for a short time in the early universe, or perhaps it is the primordial magnetic fields created during the Big Bang, or perhaps what is being missed is more about ourselves than the universe.

Ways of seeing

Some cosmologists, including Friedman, suspected that unknown errors were to blame for Hubble’s tension. For example, Cephasian variable stars are located in the disks of younger galaxies in regions full of stars, dust, and gas. Even with Hubble’s fine resolution, you don’t see a single Cephasian variable, according to George Afstatio, an astrophysicist at the University of Cambridge. Rather, you see it overlapping with other stars. This density of stars makes measurements of brightness difficult.

When the James Webb Telescope launches in 2021, Reiss and his colleagues will use its powerful infrared camera to peer into the crowded regions that host the Cephasian variables. They wanted to know whether the claims of Friedman and other researchers about the effect of the area’s crowding on the observations were correct.

James Webb telescope mirrorsThe 6.5-meter multi-section mirror of the James Webb Space Telescope at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland. This mirror passed various test stages in 2017.

When the researchers compared the new numbers to distances calculated from Hubble data, they saw a surprising match. The latest results from the James Webb telescope confirmed the Hubble constant measured by the Hubble telescope a few years ago: 73 km/s/Mpa with a difference of one kilometer or so.

Concerned about crowding, Friedman turned to alternative stars that could serve as distance indicators. These stars are found in the outer reaches of galaxies and away from the crowd. One of those stars belongs to the group ” Red Giant Branch ” or TRGB for short. A red giant is an old star with a puffy atmosphere that shines brightly in the red light spectrum. As a red giant ages, it eventually burns helium in its core, and at this point, the star’s temperature and brightness suddenly decrease.

A typical galaxy has many red giants. If you plot the brightness of these stars against their temperature, you reach a point where the brightness drops off. The star population before this brightness drop is a good distance indicator; Because in each galaxy, such a population has a similar distribution of luminosity. By comparing the brightness of these star populations, astronomers can estimate their relative distances.

The Hubble tension shows that the standard model of the cosmos is missing something

Regardless of the method used, physicists must calculate the absolute distance of at least one galaxy as a reference point in order to calibrate the entire scale. Using TRGB as a distance index is more complicated than using Kyphousian variables. MacKinnon and colleagues used nine wavelength filters from the James Webb telescope to understand how brightness relates to their color.

Astronomers are also looking for a new indicator: carbon-rich stars that belong to a group known as the “Jay region asymptotic giant” (JAGB). These stars are far from the bright disk of the galaxy and emit a lot of infrared light. However, it was not possible to observe them at long distances until James Webb’s launch.

Friedman and his team have applied for observation time with the James Webb Space Telescope in order to observe TRGBs and JAGBs, along with more fixed spacing indices and Cephasian variables, in 11 galaxies.

The vanishing solution

On March 13, 2024, Friedman, Lee, and the rest of the team meet in Chicago to find out what they’ve been hiding from each other. Over the past months, they were divided into three groups, each tasked with measuring distances to 11 galaxies using one of three methods: Cephasian variable stars, TRGBs, and JAGBs.

These galaxies also host related types of supernovae, so their distances can calibrate the distances of supernovae in many more distant galaxies. The rate at which galaxies move away from us divided by their distance gives the value of the Hubble constant.

Wendy FriedmanWendy Friedman at the University of Chicago is trying to fit the James Webb Telescope observations into the Standard Cosmological Model.

Three groups of researchers calculated distance measures with a unique, random counterbalancing value added to the data. During the face-to-face session, they removed those values ​​and compared the results.

All three methods obtained similar distances with three percent uncertainty. Finally, the group calculated three values ​​of Hubble’s constant for each distance index. All values ​​were within the theoretical prediction range of 67.4. Therefore, Hubble’s tension seemed to be resolved. However, they ran into problems with further analysis to write the results.

The JAGB analysis was good, But the other two were wrong. The team found that there were large error bars in the TRGB measurements. They tried to minimize the errors by including more TRGBs; But when they started doing this, they found that the distance to the galaxies was less than they first thought. This change caused the value of Hubble’s constant to increase.

Friedman’s team also discovered an error in Cephaus’s analysis: in almost half of the pulsating stars, the term crowd was applied twice. Correcting this error increased the value of Hubble’s constant significantly. Hubble’s tension was revived.

Finally, after efforts to fix the errors, the researchers’ paper presents three distinct values ​​of Hubble’s constant. The JAGB measurement yielded a result of 67.96 km/s/megaparsec. The TRGB result was equal to 69.85 with similar error margins. Hubble’s constant was obtained at a higher value of 72.05 in the Kyphousian variable method. In this way, different hypotheses about the characteristics of these stars caused Hubble’s stress value to vary from 69 to 73.

By combining the aforementioned methods and uncertainties, the average Hubble stress value equal to 69.96 was obtained with an uncertainty of four percent. This margin of error overlaps with the theoretical prediction of the expansion rate of the universe, as well as the higher value of Tim Reiss.

Tensions and resolutions

The James Webb Space Telescope has provided methods for measuring the Hubble constant. The idea is simple: closer galaxies look more massive; Because you can make out some of their stars, while more distant galaxies have a more uniform appearance.

A method called gravitational convergence is more promising. A massive galaxy cluster acts like a magnifying glass, bending and magnifying the image of a background object, creating multiple images of the background object when its light takes different paths.

Brenda Fry, an astronomer at the University of Arizona, is leading a program to observe seven clusters with the James Webb Space Telescope. Looking at the first images they captured last year of the G165 cluster, Fry and his colleagues noticed three spots that were not previously seen in the images. These three points were actually separate images of a supernova that was located in the background of the aforementioned cluster.

After repeating the observation several times, the researchers calculated the difference between the arrival times of the three gravitational lensing images of the supernova. This time delay is proportional to Hubble’s constant and can be used to calculate this value. The group obtained an expansion velocity of 75.4 km/s/Mpa with a large uncertainty of 8.1%. Fry expects the error bars to correct after several years of similar measurements.

Both Friedman’s and Reiss’ teams predict that they will be able to get a better answer with James Webb’s observations in the coming years. “With improved data, the Hubble tension will eventually be resolved, and I think we’ll get to the bottom of it very quickly,” Friedman says.

Continue Reading

Space

James Webb vs. Hubble

Published

on

By

James Webb vs. Hubble
The first full-color image of James Webb was finally released this week after a long wait; But how are these new photos different from the Hubble Space Telescope images?

James Webb vs. Hubble; Comparing the images of two space telescopes

The James Webb Space Telescope is now the flagship of the world of space telescopes. James Webb uses the largest mirror of any telescope launched into space and orbits the Sun at a distance from Earth (approximately 1.5 million kilometers). This telescope is supposed to make a big change in astronomy and astrophysics by looking at the farthest parts of the world and unveiling new secrets.

However, in the past three decades, the Hubble Space Telescope has been the main player in the field of space telescopes. Launched in 1990, this telescope has recorded many epic images of planets, stars, galaxies, nebulae and many other astronomical wonders.

Since Hubble was in near-Earth orbit, it could take accurate pictures of the universe without the Earth’s atmosphere interfering with its operation. The telescope captured amazing images during its prolific career and continues to serve its mission. According to NASA, over the past 32 years, Hubble has made 1.5 million observations and contributed to more than 19,000 scientific papers.

Now James Webb is going to take the flag from Hubble and further enhance our understanding of the universe. In a blog post comparing the two space telescopes, NASA called James Webb the “scientific successor” to Hubble. Without Hubble’s observations of the cosmos, researchers would not have prioritized building a telescope that could go beyond Hubble’s field of view. Continue with Zoomit to have a closer look at the images of celestial targets in both telescopes.

Deep field

Hubble Deep Wallpaper

The top right photo is the deep Hubble wallpaper taken in 1995 and released in 1996. At the time of recording, this photo was considered the deepest image taken of the universe. In order to make it, the researchers took 342 photos during 10 days with a total of 100 hours of exposure. The final result revealed more than three thousand scattered galaxies in a very small part of the sky. Over the next few decades, Hubble operators took better pictures of this type and looked much deeper into space.

Hubble Ultra Deep Wallpaper
The Hubble Ultra Deep Image or XDF was released in 2012.

The photo above is the Hubble Ultra Deep Wallpaper released in 2012. More than 5500 galaxies are visible in this photo. Over the course of a decade, the researchers collected 50 days of observations from a concentrated area, resulting in two million seconds of exposure (over 23 days).

Then along came James Webb. The first full-color scientific photo by James Webb was released on Tuesday morning Iran time by US President Joe Biden as a preview for the first set of telescope images. While capturing Hubble’s deep fields required days, if not weeks, of exposure, James Webb managed to capture this image after just 12.5 hours of exposure.

The recorded area of ​​the sky in the image above is incredibly small; So small that it is about the size of a grain of sand on a person’s hand on the ground. In that part of the sky, a galaxy cluster called SMACS 0732 is located 4.6 billion light-years away. This cluster is so large that it bends space-time around it and, like a cosmic microscope, reveals faint galaxies far behind it. Some of these galaxies are considered to be the faintest infrared objects ever observed, and scientists are eagerly waiting to learn more about them.

Shahabhi Nebula (Karina)

The image above shows one of Hubble’s most popular targets, the Carina Nebula, at a distance of 7,200 light years from us. The image on the right, released by the Hubble Heritage Project in 2008, shows part of the star-forming region in the corner of the nebula.

The picture looks like an impressionist landscape with hills, valleys, and columns of gas and dust scattered around, with only a few bright stars behind the nebula. Now James Webb’s updated image shows the same stunning landscape in much greater detail and clarity. In the photo, there are stars that were previously hidden behind gas and dust.

Read more: Why is Jupiter one of the first targets of the James Webb Space Telescope?

Stephan’s quintuplets

This group of five galaxies is stunning in a Hubble image taken in 2009 after the telescope’s camera was upgraded earlier that year. That year, the space shuttle made its fifth and final visit to Hubble and applied a major upgrade. In addition to the new camera that took this photo, the telescope was also upgraded and repaired. The ability of astronauts to rendezvous with Hubble in near-Earth orbit kept the space telescope operational for a very long time.

However since James Webb is so far from Earth, he will not have the advantage of meeting astronauts. However, the spacecraft has enough fuel for at least 20 years; This means that in the future we will see many more images like the one above.

The photo above shows a group of galaxies that were first observed in 1877. The upper left galaxy is considered the alien mass of the group and is much closer to Earth than the other four members. However, the other four galaxies are so close that James Webb can see the shock waves from the interaction between them as they kill each other.

Stephen’s quintuplet is the largest image taken by the James Webb Telescope and is actually a mosaic made up of more than a thousand separate images captured by the telescope’s two instruments: the Near Infrared Camera (NIRCam) and the Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI). Both cameras collect infrared wavelengths of light and help James Webb see through gas and dust; But as their names suggest, both collect different wavelengths of infrared light.

Southern Ring Nebula

The last image is the Southern Ring Nebula, which was imaged by Hubble in 1998. The “ring” is the dying star particles (the faintest of the two bright spots in the center of the image). The little white dwarf causing all this chaos was a star the size of our Sun. At some point, the star ran out of fuel and ejected its outer layers, creating the ring seen in the image. The diameter of the ring is about half a light year and the gases are moving outward at a speed of nearly 14.5 km/s.

On the left, the Southern Ring Nebula is seen through the eyes of James Webb’s two instruments, Nirkem and Miri. The image we have chosen for comparison was captured by Nirkam’s near-infrared camera. Another version of the image is also recorded in mid-infrared.

Continue Reading

Popular