Technology

The best brain multiplayer games for Android 2023

Published

11 months ago

24/05/2023

pouyan

The best brain multiplayer games for Android 2023 with direct download links for all Android phones in June 2023, in the following we see 15 of the best intellectual multiplayer games for Android, puzzle and solving games.

The best puzzle multiplayer games for Android 2023 with direct download links

Challenge your friends to a battle of wits to see who is the smartest with these free multiplayer games!

No matter how old you are, or how smart you think you are, it’s important to exercise your brain regularly. Fortunately, there are many fun ways to do this. One of them is playing multiplayer mind games with your friends.

These mobile games test your brain’s gray matter and allow you to demonstrate your knowledge and skills to anyone willing to play with you. So, can you beat your friends in one of these amazing multiplayer brain games? All of them are free to play.

You can also see content about Who has saved our number ?

1. Maze King

Best multiplayer brain games for Android: Mazes can make a great brain exercise game, and the bigger the maze, the more challenging it is. Maze King is a great game to show off your solving skills against others. Play in Stage Mode to enjoy the game, then switch to Multiplayer mode to face off against a friend.

You can invite your friends with a tap that sends the game link via SMS. Or you can compete with a random player if you want.

Download link: Maze King for Android iOS

2. Chess Time

The best multiplayer brain games for Android: Chess Time is a great mobile option to play with friends around the world. The game offers different background colors to choose from, leaderboards by country and ranking, and a timer to see how long the challenge lasts. You can also enable options like quick chat keyboard, coordinate display and valid movement color.

Connecting with friends is easy: if you know a player’s username, you can look it up or send them an invite via email or SMS.

Download link: Chess Time for Android iOS

3. Chess With Friends Free

Best Multiplayer Brain Games for Android: If you prefer to face your Facebook friends in a game of chess, Chess With Friends Free is the way to go. Search for a friend or find a player by username. You can enable chat notifications, make yourself available to other players, and make yourself visible on leaderboards.

Chat while playing or just focus on the game. You can also discover a new opponent and view the leaderboard for the month.

Download link: Chess With Friends Free for Android | iOS

4. Skillz – Logical Brain

The best multiplayer brain games for Android: Skillz _ Logical Brain is a great way to train your brain. This app has a variety of brain teasers that you can choose from or you can play a random game.

After logging into Google (on Android), start level one by choosing a friend. Then, show off your skills in puzzles and challenges that test your memory, reflexes, accuracy and speed.

You can write a message to other players who are waiting for the game in the rooms and see where you stand on the leaderboard.

Download link: Skillz – Logical Brain for Android iOS

5. QuizUp

Best Multiplayer Brain Games for Android: QuizUp is a fun trivia game with a wide variety of topics. You can choose from business, education, history and science. Or see who knows more about sports, games, TV and music. The trick is to answer quickly and correctly in a round of questions. Level up as you destroy your friends in this battle of wits.

You can easily connect using Facebook and then search for friends who have installed the game. After you’ve played a round, hit the chat button to gloat to your friends about how you beat them.

Download link: QuizUp for Android iOS

6. Trivia Crack

Best Multiplayer Trivia Games for Android: The original Trivia Crack is still available and still blasting. Your goal is to collect one character for each of six categories: Art, History, Science, Sports, Geography, and Entertainment. To do this, keep answering the questions correctly about the category you hit when you spin the wheel.

Log in to Facebook to play with your friends or connect to Twitter to invite others. Trivia Crack is a turn-based game, so you can take your turn when you have time. You can also chat in the game and share your level achievements to keep your victories.

Download link: Trivia Crack for Android | iOS

7. Trivia Crack Kingdoms

Best Multiplayer Trivia Games for Android: If you enjoyed the first Trivia Crack game, check out Trivia Crack Kingdoms. Find out who’s really in the trivia realm in a battle royale with your friends.

Choose a channel topic such as sports, world history, food and drink, movies or TV shows. Then you get crowns when you answer correctly, and you try to collect them all before your opponent does.

You can challenge your friends by connecting to Facebook. Plus, Trivia Crack Kingdoms offers an in-app chat for a little trash talk.

Download link: Trivia Crack Kingdoms for Android | iOS

8. Words With Friends

The best multiplayer intellectual games for Android: The game Words With Friends has been popular all over the world for years. But if you’ve never tried it and you enjoy word games, then you should check it out. The gameplay is similar to Scrabble where you create words with the letters you are given. Words must be connected on the game board, and longer words and letters with higher point values help you score more points.

Like Chess With Friends Free and developed by the same company, Words lets you play against your Facebook friends. Chat during the game, take turns when you have a minute to spare and show off your clever skills with high-scoring words.

Download link: Words With Friends for Android | iOS

9. Word Chums

The best multiplayer brain games for Android: Try your skills in Word Chums for a Words With Friends style game with cute characters. With the same kind of gameplay as Scrabble, a colorful interface and a fun experience, creating words for high scores is really fun. Word Chums also offers power-ups to replace all your letters and get high-scoring hints.

You can play against Facebook friends, other Word Chums players, or someone in your contact list. The game has an in-app chat that allows you to talk to each other during the match.

Download link: Word Chums for Android iOS

10. Pictoword

Best Multiplayer Brain Games for Android: For a variety of word game battles, Pictoword is a picture-based challenge. The concept is simple. You see two pictures that combine to form a word. You just have to figure out what the word is by the number of letter spaces provided.

Unlike the other games on this list, Pictoword lets you create a “family” to play with. You’ll have to work your way through the levels first, but it’s great practice. Then create your group, invite members and chat during a break.

Download link: Pictoword for Android iOS

11. Infinite Word Search

The best multiplayer intellectual games for Android: Another intellectual game that you can play with your friends is Infinite Word Search . The game is played in the same classic style of word search puzzles that you have seen everywhere. But Infinite Word Search lets you choose the theme of your puzzle with options like animals, countries, fashion and many more.

If you think your word search skills are better than your Facebook friends, connect and play a friend. See who can find the fastest words in real-time gameplay. This adds a bit of a challenge to the gameplay, especially if you’re both looking for the same word at the same time.

Download link: Infinite Word Search for Android iOS

These multiplayer mind games are a lot of fun

It’s natural to love a game you’re good at. This is even better if you often outplay or simply outdo your friends. With these games you can improve your skills and prove that you are the smartest among your friends. So, let the clever battle of wits begin! You might even want to try some free online cognitive tests.

Source: MAKEUSEOF.COM

Related Topics:android android games games

Up Next

A million dollar prize for the best AI control ideas

Don't Miss

How to find out who has saved our number with what name

Click to comment

Technology

6 features of HyperOS operating system that you must experience

Published

5 days ago

11/04/2024

pouyan

HyperOS provides users with many features, including a new control center and the ability to personalize the lock screen.

6 features of HyperOS operating system that you must experience

HyperOS is the new operating system of Xiaomi that was introduced some time ago and according to the schedule, it will be available in different time frames for the announced phones. Compared to MIUI, HyperVas includes changes that bring a fast and light experience to users. In this article, we will review 6 prominent features of HyperVas; Features that some of which add to the attractiveness of the phone and others facilitate working with the operating system.

Customized lock screen design

The appearance changes of Hyper OS are such that it gives a new face to your phone and uses beautiful visual effects. This operating system allows you to change the font color and apply different effects to the background animation (such as clock and date numbers) by providing different designs for the lock screen. Also, despite the high similarity of the HyperOS lock screen with iOS backgrounds, users will feel the dynamism and charm in the designs of this operating system.

Users in HyperOS have access to three design styles to choose their desired lock screen: Classic, Rhombus, and Magazine. Classic is a minimalist style that displays real-time weather data along with a variety of fonts for the time and date. However, in Rhombus and Magazine styles, users have more customization options.

Smarter and better gallery

Among the new features of the gallery, we can mention the smart cutting of images; Where you can separate them from the background by touching the parts you want in the photo and then put them in different themes. If you have another background in mind, touch the image and choose the option to change the background by selecting the three vertical dots. After selecting your desired theme, click on the Save option.

Some features of the gallery have also been moved to the bottom bar of the program, and even a special tab called Recommended (suggestions) can be seen to access gallery options. Another new item refers to the ID feature and helps to generate isolated images with ID.

Dynamic notch and beautiful display

Dynamic Island or Dynamic Island is a new technology that Apple has used in all iPhone 15 series phones and the success of this technology has made Android manufacturers think about its presence in their phones. For this reason, Realme has brought this technology to its devices under the name of Mini Capsule, and OnePlus has also included this feature in the OxygenOS 14 update.

Xiaomi also released a version of Dynamic Island with HyperOS and apparently many call it Dynamic Notch. You can see the Xiaomi dynamic notch while charging, and activating DND and hotspot. Although this technology is not very practical, it visually enhances the appeal of Hyper OS.

More order in the Control Center

Users will access the Control Center by dragging down the right corner of the screen. In an interesting move, Xiaomi has given the Control Center a minimal look so that we can see a cleaner arrangement on this screen. If users have problems with this style of design, they can disable the Don’t Show Icon Labels option through Settings > Notifications & Status Bar. Xiaomi has also added a music player shortcut to Control Center and put the Wi-Fi options in a small pop-up.

Improved Multitasking

In Hyper OS, we see smoother multitasking that brings better control of Split Screens, easier closing of floating windows, and better access to shortcuts. Such features come in handy when you’re taking notes from meetings, copying content from one app to another, and chatting with your friends, making your access easier.

Easier removal of unnecessary programs

Finally, Xiaomi has made it possible in HyperOS to remove most of the phone’s default programs, which are called bloatware. Xiaomi phones in different price ranges come with many non-useful applications that collectively take up a part of the device’s storage space, But now users are able to get rid of these sometimes useless programs and consider more space for other programs.

Conclusion

Xiaomi has spent a lot of time and effort in the development of HyperOS and plans to connect its products through a strong ecosystem, just like Samsung and Apple. Although this operating system still works and is inspired by iOS, it is expected to provide users with more useful and attractive features in the future.

Technology

Does not activating the flight mode cause the plane to crash

Published

7 days ago

09/04/2024

pouyan

Many airlines ask passengers to put their phones in flight mode during the flight to avoid accidents; But how true is this belief?

Does not activating the flight mode cause the plane to crash?

It has probably happened that when boarding the plane and before the flight, the flight attendant will ask you to turn off all your electronic devices or put your mobile phones on flight mode. Airplane mode prevents the device from receiving and sending radio waves by disabling all wireless device connections, such as cellular network, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and GPS. At first glance, it may seem logical to put the phone in flight mode, but how true is the belief that using the phone while flying will be disastrous?

In 2022, Europe will allow passengers to make phone calls and use the Internet to do their work during the flight. But to do this, all planes had to install a device called “Pico-cells”. Picocell is a device similar to a traffic controller that prevents cell phone signals from interfering with aircraft communication systems.

By installing Picocell in the plane, you can easily connect to the Internet

You might think to yourself that picocell is a very new technology, but it is interesting to know that 20 years have passed since the creation of these devices. Before we delve into the myth of airplane flight mode, let’s learn a little more about picocells.

What is Picocell?

Before getting acquainted with the concept of picocell, it is necessary to get acquainted with the definition of tuberculosis. The area covered by telecommunication waves, towers, or base stations in mobile phone networks is called a cell. Base stations are the very tall towers you see along roads or highways. To better understand this concept, divide the whole city into small pieces like a beehive. Each segment is a tube covered by one of the Base Transceiver Stations (BTS). By placing all cells next to each other, the entire city can be covered by telecommunication waves.

base station

Note that there are different types of cells and their type depends on the coverage of telecommunication waves. “Femto-cell” refers to the smallest cell and “Macro-cell” refers to the largest cell. Therefore, the range of cells varies from a few meters to tens of kilometers. Some mobile phone operators sell Femtocell directly to their users in order to improve home network coverage. Using the Femtocell is very simple, just plug it into the power outlet, then connect the Ethernet cable from the Femtocell to your router or modem.

The mobile network generally consists of two parts:

Radio network: This section consists of all the equipment and infrastructure that is required to send and receive radio signals between mobile devices and base stations. BTSs act as the interface between the mobile network and user devices.
Core network: This section includes all the equipment and infrastructure used to manage and route calls, messages, and data in the mobile network.

Note that the mobile network is also composed of other parts, but for simplicity, we will focus only on the two radio networks and the core. Femtocells, microcells, macrocells, and picocells are part of the radio network. These cells connect your mobile phone to the radio network by creating a suitable network coverage. Next, the radio network will be connected to the mobile core network. The connection between the base station and the network core is called Backhaul.

Mobile network operators use cell towers or base stations to create mobile network coverage. As we said, the coverage area where the base station signals can successfully reach the mobile phone is called TB. Mobile phone operators have deployed a large number of base stations for nationwide network coverage.

Each base station consists of a certain number of cells. The cells in the mobile network have different sizes. The size of each tube depends on the area to be covered. Cells are represented using hexagons connected to each other (image below). A group of interconnected cells is called a cluster.

Hexagonal cells next to each other

Cells are connected to each other. Therefore, you can easily go from one point to another without disconnecting your mobile phone. Microcells are primary cells that provide primary coverage within the mobile network.

As we mentioned at the beginning of this section, tuberculosis has different sizes. Different types of cells in the mobile network are shown in the image below. The smallest cell is called femtocell and the largest cell is called microcell. Femtocells cover up to 10 meters and macrocells up to tens of kilometers. Picocells are larger than femtocells and macrocells are larger than picocells.

The use of different types of tubes in different places

An important question that may arise is why we need cells of small and large sizes. When using a mobile phone and communicating, the quality of the communication and the coverage of the telecommunication network are of great importance. Adequate coverage means that signals can successfully travel from the base station to the mobile device and vice versa. The use of cells with different sizes in the mobile network has several advantages. These benefits include increased capacity, coverage, signal quality, and traffic management.

Smaller cells are cheaper than larger cells because they require less equipment and infrastructure. Four cells are compared in the table below.

type of tuberculosis	Range in kilometers or meters	Uses
femtocell	up to 10 meters	Home or small businesses
picocell	Up to 200 meters	Stores with big companies
microcell	Up to 2 km	Streets, train stations or very busy buildings
macrocell	up to tens of kilometers	Highways or sparsely populated areas

Comparison table of types of tuberculosis

The femtocell is the smallest tube. In most cases, mobile operators sell these cells to their customers as signal boosters. These cells can cover an area up to 10 meters radius.

Different cells together allow access to the Internet, even in the most remote places

Picocells are larger than femtocells. These cells can provide coverage and capacity up to a radius of 200 meters. Smaller cells provide more capacity for users in densely populated areas and reduce interference between users. Also, they use radio frequencies more efficiently.

Mobile phone operators are responsible for managing and setting up picocells. Therefore, these cells must be professionally installed and connected to the main power and “backhaul” like any normal base station. Picocells are commonly used in buildings and stores, and from 2022 onward in airplanes.

An airplane flies over a telecommunication tower.

Small cells cover small areas and are typically used to provide adequate coverage in areas where macrocell signals cannot successfully reach, such as inside buildings or tunnels. Picocells use different radio frequencies than macrocells. This allows them to deliver stronger signals in smaller areas without interfering with macrocells.

The most important advantages of using picocells are:

Better coverage: Picocells provide a stronger signal compared to macrocells.
More capacity: Picocells support more users in a certain area. This issue is of great importance in high-traffic places, such as shopping centers and stadiums.
Better quality of service: Picocells offers better quality of service, such as better voice clarity and higher data rates.
Lower cost: Picocells are more economical than macrocells due to their smaller size and lower power consumption.

Although the use of picocell has many advantages, its disadvantages such as covering small areas, interference (loss of quality), and complexity cannot be ignored.

Microcells are larger than picocells and cover a radius of up to two kilometers. Macrocells are the basic cells that mobile operators use to provide basic network coverage.

Now that we are familiar with the types of cells and the use of picocells, let’s discuss the issue of activating the flight mode of mobile phones in airplanes and the history of this misconception.

Where did the story of activating the airplane mode start?

Nowadays, mobile phones have become an integral part of our lives and it is not strange that we want to still have access to the ability to make calls and use the Internet in any situation, including during a plane flight.

The American Civil Aviation Organization first suggested activating flight mode in airplanes in 1963

The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has concluded that portable electronic devices such as cell phones can interfere with aircraft radios and other electronic systems. This led to concerns regarding the use of these devices while flying.

The FAA first published rules in 1963 to address this concern. According to these rules, airlines are the best option for choosing the allowed electronic devices on board. In 1991, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) banned the use of cell phones and other wireless devices on airplanes. The ban included wireless devices using the 800 MHz frequency. The 800 MHz frequency is used for a wide range of terrestrial telecommunications services, including mobile services.

Someone is working with a laptop in the plane.

The ban was imposed due to possible interference with wireless networks on Earth. The FAA recommends that airlines turn off portable electronic devices capable of transmitting signals, including cell phones, during flight to comply with FCC rules and to minimize risk to aircraft radios and other electrical and electronic systems.

At first glance, the establishment of these rules may seem logical. But in 2005, a member of the Communications Commission emphasized that due to the use of picocells, there would be no problem with using mobile phones while flying. Nicholas Sabatini, the then CEO of the FAA, believed that due to technological advances, there may no longer be a need to ban cell phone use on airplanes.

However, the ban on the use of mobile phones remained as the law. In 2013, Tom Wheeler, the new CEO of the FCC, tried to make a big change by lifting the ban on making calls and using the Internet while flying. But this issue caused a big controversy.

What do the opponents and supporters of activating the airplane mode say?

For some people, using a cell phone while flying is like a “cage fight” at 35,000 feet. These people say that as much as cage fighting is dangerous for the contestants, the use of cell phones while flying can also endanger the lives of passengers. Also, this group believes that making calls during the flight will cause inconvenience to the passengers and cause discomfort and stress to them because the space of the plane is small.

Using mobile phones while flying may cause stress and anger in passengers

On the other hand, the other group believes that due to the advancement of technology and since there is no possibility of interference of mobile waves with aircraft navigation equipment, there is no need to ban the use of mobile phones in airplanes. According to them, governments should not interfere in the way airlines manage and serve passengers, and airlines should be able to decide for themselves. They also say that when we have coped with the crying of babies, the incessant conversation of passengers, and their commuting, why should the conversation be on our line phone?

Why has airplane mode activation become a popular belief?

This, like many other beliefs, is mostly accepted due to habit and popular belief. Many travelers believe that turning on airplane mode, like doing many other things while flying, not only keeps them safe but also prevents passengers from getting angry during the flight. However, there is no evidence of a relationship between passenger anger and in-flight cell phone use.

Some say that talking on the phone on the plane annoys the passengers

Today, passengers on most flights can connect to Wi-Fi, make voice calls, and surf the Internet by paying a small fee. If more aircraft use picocells, it’s likely that these things can be done for free. While Wi-Fi calling is available on some airlines, SIM card calling is still prohibited on many flights.

The truth is that cell phones haven’t caused any disruption to aircraft electrical systems or ground wireless services for years, and it was even possible to make in-flight calls with Airfone phones until 2013. It seems that the main reason for the flight mode legend to remain is the airline’s policy, the annoyance of passengers from the sound of other passengers’ conversations, and the torment of people’s own consciences.

Finally, putting the mobile phone in flight mode is still one of the important debates for which the definitive result has not been determined. Currently, many airlines require passengers to put their phones in flight mode; But European lawmakers are trying to lift the ban on making calls on airplanes. Probably the day when all airlines end this ban, the name of the “flight mode” option in smartphones will be changed; Or maybe it will stay that way, and years from now people will be asking themselves why disabling all phone connections is called Airplane Mode.

Technology

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED laptop review

Published

1 week ago

07/04/2024

pouyan

Asus ZenBook 14 OLED laptop has the same feeling we experienced with the MacBook Air M1 three years ago thanks to the Intel Core Ultra processor.

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED laptop review

Asus ZenBook 14 is one of the most important laptops of recent years; Not because it’s a Zenbook or because of its 120Hz OLED screen and 1.2kg weight, but because it gives us the same feeling we experienced when we reviewed the MacBook Pro M1 more than 3 years ago; So, join me to review the performance of the first laptop in the Iranian market with the 14th generation Meteor Lake processor by reviewing the Zenbook 14 OLED.

If you haven’t been away from the world of technology for the past few years, you probably know that in 2020, Apple took its first step to become independent from Intel and launched the 13-inch MacBook Pro and MacBook Air with the exclusive M1 chip. Laptops that made a lot of noise from the beginning with their very good performance, excellent charging, stunning productivity, and also caused Intel a big problem.

Intel struggled for three years to be able to reach the productivity level of its processors of Apple’s M series; From the end of 2020 until just a month or two ago, the 11th, 12th, and 13th generations were launched one after the other; But none of them could even compete with M1 in terms of performance to power consumption ratio, let alone the next generations of this chip; But it seems that finally, after three years, it is going to go down the throat of Windows users!

Intel’s 14th generation Core Ultra processors are the beginning of a trend in the world of Windows laptops that Apple launched for the first time more than three years ago with its own chips in Mac laptops. Intel says Meteorlake processors are the biggest change in the company’s 40-year history of processor architecture.

Earlier in the article ” All about Meteor Lake; Intel’s revolution in laptop processors with tiles! » We talked in detail about the architecture of Mythurelik processors; But in summary, I must mention that things like island design with separate CPU and GPU tiles, the addition of neural processing unit for AI processes, focus on improving the performance of integrated graphics, improving productivity and of course, the new naming format are among the most important changes of Mythorlik compared to Reptorlik.

Fast performance and great charging with Mitorelic

Asus offers the Zenbook 14 OLED laptop with three models of Mitolake processors including Core Ultra 5 125H, Core Ultra 155H, and Core Ultra 185H. These processors differ in terms of the number of powerful CPU cores, the number of GPU cores, and the base and maximum frequencies of the cores. We had the Core Ultra 7 model on hand for review, which rivals Apple’s entry-level M1, M2, and even M3 chips.

Zenbook 2024; Windows laptop curse breaker!

The new Asus Ultrabook can be purchased with 8, 16, or 32 GB of onboard RAM (soldered to the motherboard) and a 512 GB or 1 TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD. Note that the 16GB and 32GB models use LPDDR5X RAM; While the RAM model is 8 GB of LPDDR5 type; The difference between these two types of RAM is due to their difference in the maximum data exchange rate.

We had the Asus Zenbook 14 OLED laptop with 32GB of high-speed LPDDR5X-7467 RAM from SK Hynix and a 1TB SSD with a 4-lane PCIe Gen 4.0 interface from SanDisk available for review. We obtained the reading and writing speed of the device’s SSD as 4964.69 and 3292.99 MB, respectively, which is not a very favorable speed compared to the price tag of the product and the PCIe Gen 4.0 interface of the SSD itself.

Let’s talk a little about the technical specifications of the processor that powers the Asus Zenbook 14 OLED. The Core Ultra 7 155H processor can be seen as a weakened version of the Core Ultra 9 185H, the highest member of the 14th generation of the Metierlik family; Because all the technical specifications are the same from the number of cores to their graphics processing unit, only Core Ultra 7 cores work at a much lower frequency; A difference that also leads to a reduction in chip consumption.

Asus Zenbook 14 laptop in half open mode

Mythurelic chips consist of Compute and Graphics tiles and SoC along with IO; The Compute tile hosts high-power cores (P Core) and optimized cores (E Core), the Graphics tile plays the role of the graphics processing unit, the IO tile hosts the communication paths of the chip including Thunderbolt, and the SoC tile houses very low-power cores for background processing. (LP E Cores), neural processing unit (NPU) and communication units with the display and media encoding and decoding blocks; Therefore, the CPU is placed in two tiles and is a combination of three types of cores.

Meteorlake processors are the best Windows tools so far to compete with MacBooks

The Core Ultra 7 155H chip consists of 6 P-Core cores, 8 E-Core cores, and 2 LP E-Core cores, with base frequencies of 1.4 GHz, 900 and 700 MHz and turbo frequencies of 4.8, 3.8, and 2.5, respectively. It uses GHz as a CPU, and in total, 22 processing threads are processed at the same time; Therefore, only high-power P-Core cores benefit from multithreading. Compute tile is produced with Intel 4 7nm lithography.

Running CineBench test on Asus Zenbook 14 laptop

The Graphics tile in the Core Ultra 7 155H chip is powered by 8 ray tracing units and 8 Xe cores including 128 Vector engines with a maximum frequency of 2.25 GHz. Intel allows companies to name the integrated Core Ultra 7 155H graphics in laptops with at least 16 GB of RAM, reminiscent of the Arc series desktop graphics cards. Graphics tile is produced with TSMC’s N5 5nm lithography.

Manufacturing companies can use the Core Ultra 7 155H chip, depending on the cooling capacity of their laptops, with a thermal design power of 28 to 115 watts; So on paper, this chip will be a good choice for both light and thin ultrabooks like Zenbook and powerful gaming laptops.

Asus has developed software called MyASUS for Zenbook family laptops, which is considered a device management hub. With MyASUS, you can get firmware and software updates and change performance profiles or display profiles. A number of AI-based features such as removing microphone noise are also available in this software.

MyASUS software on Asus Zenbook 14 laptop

Asus provides performance profiles in a part of the MyASUS software called Fan Profile and in three modes: Whisper mode (lowest possible mode), Standard mode (default mode and suitable for daily use), and Performance mode (suitable for heavy use). Asus says Performance mode is only suitable for when the device is plugged in.

In the upcoming review, we put the performance of the laptop under the microscope in different scenarios, including the state connected to the power and disconnected from the power outlet, with Performance and Standard modes, so that you can have a good view of the capabilities of the 14th generation and expensive Asus ultrabook.

It is not surprising that Asus used the Core Ultra 7 155H chip with a TDP of about 28 watts in its thin and slim Ultrabook; But with this TDP range, what performance can we expect from the ZenBook 14 OLED?

Asus ZenBook 14 OLED performance in benchmarks when plugged in
Laptop/benchmark	Technical Specifications	Web browsing	Performance in graphics	CPU performance in rendering	CPU computing power	GPU computing power
		Web browsing	3 Dark	CineBench R23	GeekBench 6	GeekBench 6
		Speedometer 2.1	TimeSpy	Single Multi	Single Multi	OpenCL
		Speedometer 2.1	DirectX 12	Single Multi	Single Multi	iGPU dGPU
Zenbook 14	Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc GPU	396	3453	1637 13367	2290 12256	34889 —
Galaxy Book 3 Ultra	Core i7-13700H RTX4050	396	7052	1830 14800	2591 13261	17416 74549
MacBook Pro 2022	Apple M2 10-core GPU	407	—	1579 8730	2556 9540	28852 —
MacBook Air 2022	Apple M2 8 core GPU	405	—	1577 8476	2551 9552	27846 —
MacBook Pro 2020	Apple M1 8 core GPU	209	—	1512 7778	2291 8188	21646 —
Zenbook 14	Core i7-1360P Intel GPU	—	—	1823 10512	—	16359 —
MacBook Pro 14-inch 2021	M1 Max 24Core GPU	300	—	1549 12508	2378 12239	65432 —

By looking at these basic benchmarks, we can notice some interesting points. Asus ZenBook 14 with the Core Ultra 7 155H chip is about 10% weaker in single-core processing than the previous generation with the Core i7-1360P chip; But in comparison with the M1 and M2 chips, sometimes the Intel chip leads with a difference of 5 to 10% [rendering benchmark] and sometimes it remains with a 10% difference from Apple’s competitor [computing power benchmark].

In some scenarios, the Core Ultra 7 is even faster than the Apple M2

When all the cores are involved in rendering or calculations, the Intel chip shows a brighter performance compared to the Apple chips; In this situation, thanks to the number of more cores and its more updated architecture, Core Ultra 7 takes the M1 and M2 chips ahead with a difference of 50-60% [rendering benchmark] or 30-50% [computing power benchmark]; Of course, in comparison with the previous generation, we see a smaller improvement of 25%.

It seems that this year Intel has focused most of its focus on improving the integrated graphics performance of its chips; In our tests, the Core Ultra 7 155H integrated graphics outperformed its previous generation by a stunning 100% in both computing power tests and game simulator tests.

AAA gaming experience on Ultrabook thanks to Mytorlake

Intel’s integrated graphics are now ahead of the M1 integrated graphics in terms of the computing power of the graphics with an impressive difference of 60%, and compared to the M2 chip, it wins the field with a difference of 20%; But in the game simulator tests, the superiority of Core Ultra 155H over M1 is limited to about 15%, and we see 15% weaker performance of the Intel chip against M2; However, there are still not many games available for MacBook.

If you think that the excellent performance of the integrated graphics of the Core Ultra 7 is limited to benchmarks, I must say that you are wrong. Intel’s integrated graphics processor now handles AAA games at Full HD resolution and medium graphics settings. The idea that one day with a thin and light ultrabook like the Zenbook and integrated Intel graphics, it would be possible to play games like Forza Horizon 5 or Cyberpunk 2077, seemed very unlikely until just last year.

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED performance in games with a resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels
Game/Performance	Graphics settings	Average frame rate
Cyberpunk 2077	Medium Graphics RT Off Intel XeSS Auto	29.56 fps
Forza Horizon 5	Medium Graphics	40 frames per second
Red Dead Redemption	Balanced Preset Medium Quality	37.6 fps
Returnal	Medium Graphics	24 frames per second

Fortunately, the performance improvement of the new Intel chips is not only limited to games and benchmarks but even in professional applications, we see an improvement in the performance of the Core Ultra 7 in the Zenbook 14 OLED laptop.

Thanks to the Core Ultra 7 155H chip, the Zenbook 14 performs up to 10% better than the MacBook Pro M1 and M2 in Photoshop and beats the previous generation by 35%.

ZenBook 14 OLED performance in Photoshop

The performance of the new Zenbook in the Premier Pro software is more than 40% better than the previous generation and even beats the MacBook Pro M1 by more than 10%, But it is left behind the MacBook Pro M2 with a difference of 20%. Note that this laptop, just like its Apple competitors, can at best be a starting option for editing 1080p videos, nothing more.

ZenBook 14 OLED performance in Premier Pro

The interesting point for us was the performance of Zenbook 2024 in running Python codes; While in previous generations, even expensive laptops with Intel’s H-series processors were behind the MacBook M1 in this regard, now the 28-watt Core Ultra 7 155H processor is about 20% faster than the M1, and if it runs from the Linux Subsystem (WSL) instead of the PowerShell environment for Use coding, the advantage of Zenbook reaches 40%.

Performance of ZenBook 14 OLED in Python code execution

Apart from discussing the performance of the device in benchmarks and professional uses, we need to measure the state of the cooling system in uses that constantly put pressure on the processor.

To evaluate the state of the central processing unit (CPU), we put the laptop under a multi-core processing load continuously for 30 minutes. We performed this test in two modes connected to electricity and disconnected from the power outlet (Plugged/UnPlugged) with the Performance mode performance profile.

CPU power consumption chart in Zenbook 14 OLED

CPU temperature chart on Zenbook 14 OLED

As you can see in the graphs above, the laptop uses the CPU with the same frequency and the same power consumption in the Elixir of Science stress test, whether it is connected to the power or disconnected from the power outlet; Only when connected to power, the CPU has longer momentary jumps to higher frequencies, and in the initial moments it achieves a higher power consumption (60 W vs. 53 W) for a fraction of a second.

Apart from the power consumption and frequency, the temperature of the hottest CPU core also remains below 90 degrees Celsius in the rest of the moments, except for the initial moments when it reaches about 107 degrees Celsius. During the stress test, the fan of the device also works with a low noise and the temperature of the device itself does not reach an annoying level.

Performance of M1 and M2 M1 and M2 exchanges in multi-core processing

In the past three years, Apple has always had the upper hand in terms of productivity and the ratio of performance to power consumption; But this year, Intel has changed the situation in its favor, at least in part of the story.

Comparison of productivity and performance of Core Ultra 7 155H chip with Apple M1 and Apple M2 chips
Chip/benchmark	Single-core power consumption	Multi-core power consumption	single trade score	Multiple points	The ratio of single-core performance to power consumption	The ratio of multi-core performance to power consumption
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	22 to 24 watts	26 to 29 watts	1637	13367	71	486
Apple M2	About 8 watts	20 to 21 watts	1579	8730	197	436
Apple M1	About 6 watts	15 to 16 watts	1512	7778	252	486

* The results of the table above were obtained in Elixir of Science tests.

The central processor (CPU) in the Dell Core Ultra 7 155H reaches a power consumption of about 65 watts while performing multi-core processing in very short periods of time; But its power consumption fluctuates stably in the range of 26 to 29 watts. This issue makes its productivity significantly improved compared to the previous generation and even equal to M1 and M2.

The ratio of performance to power consumption in ZenBook 14 OLED

As much as the Intel chip appears stunning in multi-core processing, it is still far behind Apple’s chips in single-core processing. In this situation, the power consumption of Core Ultra 7 155H is in the range of 22 to 24 watts; While the power consumption of the Apple chip is around 6 to 8 watts and the performance difference between the two chips is not much different; Therefore, we see a 70% weakness of Intel chip productivity in single-core processing compared to Apple chips.

In order to measure the performance status of the cooling system in continuous graphics processing with Performance mode performance profile and in both Plugged and UnPlugged modes, we put the Core Ultra 7 155H GPU under continuous processing pressure for 20 minutes.

The Core Ultra 7 155H graphics processor consumes about 18 watts in plugged mode and 16 to 17 watts in unplugged mode, and the graphics frequency fluctuates between 1900 and 1700 MHz, respectively.

Zenbook 14 OLED integrated graphics power consumption chart

Zenbook 14 OLED integrated graphics temperature chart

Zenbook 14 OLED integrated graphics frequency chart

The device’s graphics behave more aggressively compared to the CPU; So that in plugged mode, the temperature of its hottest point increases continuously and reaches about 100 degrees Celsius; But in UnPlugged mode, the graphics temperature remains in the range of 90 degrees Celsius.

In continuous graphic processing, the temperature of the body, especially the area above the keyboard of the device, reaches about 45 degrees Celsius; Of course, overall, the temperature doesn’t rise so much that it becomes difficult to work with the device, although the fan noise is a bit louder during heavy GPU processing than when the CPU is stressed.

Performance of Asus Zenbook 14 OLED when connected to power and with battery
Test/Performance	Plugged result	Result UnPlugged
CineBench (Multi-Core)	13367	11137
3DMark	3453	3513
Speedometer 2.1	396	370
Blender	416	371
Premiere Pro	2940	2779
Python	49.4 seconds	58 seconds

Apart from stressful situations, Zenbook has a feeling similar to Apple’s MacBooks in normal and everyday use; In the sense that the device does not get hot, the sound is rarely heard, and more importantly, the performance of the device is more or less at the same level whether it is connected to electricity or disconnected from the power outlet; A problem that plagued Windows laptops for many years.

Plugged and UnPlugged performance of Zenbook 2024 is very close

The 14-inch Zenbook 14 OLED laptop provides the energy it needs with the help of its 75-watt-hour battery; Considering the 28-watt thermal design power of the device’s processor, this battery is considered an optimal capacity; Especially, the changes made in the architecture of Core Ultra processors have improved their productivity dramatically.

Asus Zenbook 14 has very low consumption in standby mode; so if you disconnect the device from the power outlet at night with a 100% charge, the laptop battery will be reduced by 4-5% by tomorrow morning.

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED Battery Life vs Other Laptops
Laptop/Test	Functional profile	hardware	Display	Battery capacity	Play offline video	Everyday use
		Processor and graphics	Dimensions, resolution, and refresh rate	watt-hours	720p Video	PCMark 10
		Processor and graphics	Dimensions, resolution, and refresh rate	watt-hours	minute: hour	minute: hour
Zenbook 14	Performance	Core Ultra 7-155H Intel Arc	14 inches and 120 Hz 1800 x 2880 pixels	75	17:25	9:09
Galaxy Book 3 Ultra	Performance	Core i7-13700H RTX 4050	16 inches and 120 Hz 1880 x 2880 pixels	76	11:00	6:21
MacBook Pro 2022	—	Apple M2 10-core GPU	13.3 inches and 60 Hz 1600 x 2560 pixels	58.2	26:18	—
MacBook Air 2022	—	Apple M2 8 core GPU	13.6 inches and 60 Hz 1664 x 2560 pixels	52.6	14:11	—
MacBook Pro 2020	—	Apple M1 8 core GPU	13.3 inches and 60 Hz 1600 x 2560 pixels	58.2	16:47	—
MacBook Pro 14-inch 2021	—	M1 Max 24Core GPU	14.2 inches and 120 Hz 1964 x 3024 pixels	70	18:14	—

This year, Intel has separated the video decoding engine and display output from the GPU tile and transferred it to the low-power SoC tile; Thus, when you are watching a movie or video, the GPU tile is completely turned off, and this leads to a significant improvement in charging the device during video playback; I played the Elixir of Science benchmark 720p video at 200 nits display brightness, 120 Hz refresh rate, and the Performance profile for 17 hours and 25 minutes; A result that separates Zenbook 14 from the category of Windows laptops and places it at the level of Apple MacBooks.

The excellent charging of ZenBook 14 is not only limited to video playback, this laptop continuously charges for 9 hours and 9 minutes in daily use with 200 nits brightness, a constant refresh rate of 120 Hz, and a Performance profile, which is an admirable result.

Asus provides a compact 65W charger with Zenbook 14 that charges the laptop through the USB-C port; The weakness of this charger is the lack of ability to separate the USB-C cable from the adapter.

Minimal design, very light and extremely slim

If you think that all the charms of Zenbook 2024 come back to its very good performance and exemplary charging, you must be very wrong!

Asus laptop has a very minimal and attractive design. The entire body of the device is made of aluminum and is very strong, despite such strength, the weight of the laptop reaches only 1.2 kg and its thickness reaches 14.9 mm, which makes the 14-inch Zenbook an attractive option for those who are constantly moving.

Diagonal lines can be seen on the laptop door, which, while simple, add to the attractiveness of the device. The 14-inch Zenbook is sold in two colors, gray and blue. We had the blue color available for review, which, despite its beauty, has one of the weaknesses of the laptop design: the blue laptop body easily absorbs the user’s fat and fingerprints and reduces the beauty of the device.

In addition to absorbing stains and hand fat, another weakness of the Zenbook design in my opinion is its hollowness; It seems that Asus designers, unlike companies like Apple or HP [in the Specter series], did not carve the body of the device from a block of aluminum and used thin aluminum sheets in the construction of the body. Not premium.

Remaining fingerprints on the Asus Zenbook 14 body

Although the thickness of the laptop does not exceed 15 mm; Asus engineers have been able to fit the operating ports in this slim body. The right side of the device hosts HDMI 2.1 ports, two USB-C with Thunderbolt 4 support and DisplayPort and PowerDelivery standards, and a combo audio jack; But on the left side, we only see the USB 3.2 Type-A port with a bandwidth of 5 Gb/s.

Zenbook 14 uses an island keyboard; The keys have a standard arrangement and a suitable distance from each other. The movement depth of the keys reaches 1.4 mm, and their feedback is considered favorable and quiet; The ZenBook 14 offers one of the best typing experiences we’ve had in a while. Within a short period of time, you can get used to typing with the device’s keyboard.

ZenBook 14’s trackpad is made of glass, has a decent area, and supports Microsoft’s precision drivers. We evaluate the performance of the trackpad as very accurate and smooth, and the feedback of the left and right click mechanism is also appropriate; But hopefully next year Asus will join the handful of manufacturers that use a MacBook-like haptic mechanism for their devices’ trackpads.

One of the weaknesses of the Zenbook 14 design is the lack of a glass cover on the display panel and the plastic edges around the panel. These plastic edges reduce the premium feel of the device; Of course, Asus says that the model is equipped with a touch screen, but it uses Gorilla Glass to protect the panel; We had the non-touch version available for review.

On the upper border of the screen, we see a lot of openings for the webcam and facial recognition sensor, which are clearly visible due to the plasticity of the borders and negatively affect the appearance of the device. To protect the user’s privacy, Asus has also included a slider that physically covers the webcam.

Stunning OLED display with spectacular colors

The Zenbook’s less-than-pleasing plastic bezels are compensated by its stunning OLED display. The device uses a 3K or 1800 x 2880 pixel OLED panel with a refresh rate of 120 Hz and supports HDR, which produces extremely attractive and accurate colors, covers color spaces very well, has excellent brightness, and displays extremely high contrast.

Zenbook 14 OLED screen performance against other laptops
Laptop/test	White image		Black image	contrast ratio	AdobeRGB		sRGB		DCI-P3
Laptop/test	Maximum brightness	Minimum brightness	Average brightness	Native	cover	Average error	cover	Average error	cover	Average error
Zenbook 14	512 intention (788 nits HDR)	0.27 nits	0 intentions	∞	89.6	2.6	100	0.6	99.7	1.3
MacBook Pro 2022	437 intentions	0.00 nits	0.5 nits	874	73.5	—	99.8	2.7	79.5	—
MacBook Air 2022	447 intentions	0.1 nit	0.65 nits	693	73.5	—	100	2.5	77.5	—
Galaxy Book 3 Ultra	441 intentions	4 intentions	0 intentions	∞	97.3	3.7	99.6	1.9	99.8	2.3
MacBook Pro M1 Max	455 intentions (1497 nits HDR)	0 intentions	0 intentions	∞	85	—	121.6	—	97.3	2.5

In my measurements, the ZenBook 14 achieved a very good maximum brightness of 512 nits in everyday use and an excellent 788 nits when playing HDR videos. The minimum brightness of the device reached 0.27 nits, which is a good value for use in the dark.

OLED panels usually use PWM technology to achieve low brightness; In the sense that the pixels turn on and off at a high speed and if this speed is not higher than a limit, it will cause a headache in the user. To fix the problem, Asus suggests that you set the brightness slider in Windows settings to 60% and adjust the brightness of the device with the OLED Flicker Free Dimming function in MyASUS software to achieve low brightness.

In my tests, the ZenBook 14’s display was able to cover 89.6% of the extremely wide Adobe RGB space, 99.7% of the DCI P3 color space, and 100% of the sRGB space. The accuracy of the display in producing colors was also exemplary; So the color display error in the sRGB color space reached a stunning number of 0.6 and in the DCI P3 space it reached an excellent number of 1.3.

In long-term use, OLED panels are in danger of encountering the problem of burn-in, or in simple words, image burn. Asus suggests that you make the Windows taskbar semi-transparent or set it to Auto-Hide to reduce the possibility of burn-in. In addition, the ability to renew pixels is also available in MyASUS software.

In general, whether you are a web surfer, whether you use Photoshop software to edit photos and create graphic designs, whether you are interested in watching movies, in any case, the Zenbook display will satisfy you.

Asus has paired the Zenbook’s attractive display with powerful stereo speakers tuned by Harmon/Kardon, projecting sound to the bottom of the laptop, producing loud and clear sound, and supporting Dolby Atmos surround sound technology.

The 14-inch Zenbook 2024 has been one of the best ultrabooks of the past few years; Currently, the Core Ultra 7 155H model with 32GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, and a 120Hz OLED and 3K screen is sold at a price of about 75 million Tomans, which is almost the same as the price of the MacBook Air M2 with 8GB of RAM and 512GB of SSD. For years, Windows enthusiasts have been looking for a high-quality ultrabook that can provide them with the same experience as the MacBook Air. Currently, Zenbook 2024 is the closest option to what these people want, at least in the Iranian market.

The future of Windows laptops is no longer worrying

ZenBook 14 feels similar to Apple’s MacBooks in everyday use with excellent charging, fast performance, and quiet cooling. In Elixir of Science tests such as Photoshop and running Python codes, this ultrabook came close to the MacBook Air M2, in editing FHD videos at the level of the MacBook Air M1, it showed the same performance when connected to electricity and relying on the battery, and its 75 watt-hour battery was responsible for a day. It was a perfect job.

Intel’s Meteorlake processors gave a boost to the stagnant Windows laptop market and made the competition with Apple’s MacBooks a little more serious. I hope that this trend will continue in the next few months with Arrow Lake processors and of course with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite chips; Because more and more serious competition will ultimately benefit the consumer.