Technology
Review of Xiaomi Poco F4 GT phone, price and technical specifications
Published
7 months agoon
Reviews of Xiaomi Poco F4 GT phone, price, technical specifications, design, screen, software, hardware, battery life and charging and other specifications of this phone. Checking the technical specifications of the latest mid-range Xiaomi phone.
Review of Xiaomi Poco F4 GT phone, price and technical specifications
Introduction
Gaming phones: They are like regular phones, but more for gaming. What does this even mean? What makes a game phone a gaming phone? More performance? Better cooling (sometimes with dedicated fans either internally or externally attached)? More game-oriented features like dedicated buttons? A design that makes gaming bold? RGB lights? All of the above?
What is a gaming phone? And is the Poco F4 GT a gaming phone? Does that mean it’s only good for professional gamers or can regular people enjoy it? There are really too many questions. In this article, we are going to examine exactly this: Of course, ordinary people can buy this device and enjoy it. It’s not like there’s such a thing as “overperformance.”
Poco’s GT line boasts ‘gaming’, but it does so in a quieter tone than other device families – think Red Magics, ROG Phones and the like. These are all gaming phones, but they’re different, and the Poco F4 GT seems to be on the tamer side of things, especially if you get it in any color that isn’t yellow.
Gaming aside, this phone also came with the flagship chipset of its time, so it could easily fall into the category of ‘flagship killer’ or ‘budget flagship’. So is it great at any of them, or is it trying to be too many things to too many people without actually being great at any of them?
This is what we set out to find out. We’ll say this from the start: this will not be a game-focused review. None of our long-term reviews have ever been done, and we’re not starting now. Most people overseas aren’t heavy mobile gamers, but most people there probably wouldn’t mind knowing if the Poco F4 GT could do well for them at its reasonable price. And not necessarily thanks to its game pieces, that is. But it can definitely be nice to have them.
So let’s dig in and find out what the Poco F4 GT is all about, this is the first time we’ve reviewed a gaming phone at length, and it’s also the first time we’ve fully reviewed a device from the Poco GT line. So let’s check it properly.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT phone design review
This might strike a very interesting balance for many people – for example, gamers who have office jobs and don’t want their phone to stand out too much while still offering gaming looks and features? This is certainly a very niche niche, but perhaps you can think of some others as well.
The point here is that there’s a theme to the design, and it’s on target, but it doesn’t go so far as to make the entire product off-putting to those who aren’t in the demographic that’s clearly being targeted here.
From the front, the Poco F4 GT looks just like any other mid-range or budget flagship device that has come out in the last year or two, and that’s all we can say about it. There’s a hole for the selfie camera, the screen is flat, the bezels are reasonably small (though the chin is bigger than most), and now let’s look elsewhere.
You can also see Xiaomi 13T Pro review, price and specifications
On the right is where things get really interesting as it’s busier than what you’d normally see on a Poco phone. It’s so crowded, in fact, that the volume rocker has to be moved to the left, even though it’s on the right on other Xiaomi/Redmi/Poco phones. And that’s to open the game’s magnetic pop-ups – one at the top and one at the bottom. Will gamers like these? Maybe.
If you’re not a gamer you’ll hate them? Well, it’s…complicated. The slide bits used to lock and unlock the triggers are always there, though they look and feel like buttons. While using this phone, your fingers are constantly touching them and it may or may not bother you.
The same goes for the placement of the volume rocker – other brands like Oppo have always had the volume buttons on the left side, and that’s a personal preference. For what it’s worth, the volume rocker on the left side was pretty easy for this reviewer to get used to.
On the other hand, the trigger latch is never felt. Another point is that any case you might want to use requires an inordinate amount of cutting on the right side, which ends up making it rather flimsy. The one that comes in the box is thin and flimsy to begin with and so that definitely doesn’t help matters. On the contrary, it was one of the less enjoyable carrying cases we’ve had in the past few years.
We still very much appreciate the fact that there’s one in the box, don’t get me wrong. It’s a niche device from a fairly niche brand, so you’re unlikely to get a ton of third-party case options anyway. We just wish Poco would go back to the way it did a year or two ago, because they were more solid and felt anything but sloppy.
Flip over the Poco F4 GT, and its back design is a mix of two languages: the size and position of the camera island seems to be copied and pasted from many recent phones, but the design of the LED flash and lines on the back begs to be gaming. Expose this phone. And this design shows the gaming nature of this phone without being as bold as some competing options.
We really like the LED flash design. It’s unusual but in a fun and interesting way. On the other hand, the nonsensical “freezing speediest” text on Camera Island is pretty weird. We should probably welcome the fact that the keyword “AI” doesn’t exist, but in all seriousness, please Chinese companies stop doing this. No one has ever bought or will buy a Poco F4 GT because “freezing speediest” sounds enticing, but many people might buy it despite how bad it sounds.
However, since our unit is destined for EU shores, there’s plenty of the usual writing on the back, while the Poco logo is oddly out of place here compared to some of the brand’s more affordable offerings. that we are used to the font, has subsided.
The glass back of this phone really gives you the feeling of a glass back and because of its matte, this phone is slippery. I hope you are not surprised by this. The symmetry of the rear design lines is welcome, plus nice little touches – like the fact that the volume rocker design mimics the center line as well as the camera island. Smooth edges are a trend (thanks Apple!), and Poco couldn’t hold back. We do not agree or disagree with them. We don’t feel like they make a significant difference in use for a device like this, as there’s far less “frame” to hold on the Poco F4 GT than any of the new iPhones.
Overall, the Poco F4 GT is solid, well-built, and premium, making it one of the affordable gaming flagships. If you don’t have small hands, then you will notice that the handling of this phone is similar to the handling of other phones today. In terms of size, it’s pretty average – not the biggest, but definitely not the smallest. It seems a bit heavy but we can call it comfortable to some extent. You will not feel tired after holding this phone for two hours.
Review of Xiaomi Poco F4 GT phone speakers
Poco F4 GT has four speakers, one is dual on the top and the other is dual on the bottom. Both are on the right side so that neither is muffled by your hands holding the phone when playing in landscape mode. It’s a very good decision on Poco’s part, and we like the setup a lot – not just for gaming, but it also works great when you’re watching videos in landscape mode.
As a result, we never had a problem hearing the speakers – it’s truly amazing what good positioning can really do. They’re honestly not the best speakers on the market, nor are they the loudest, but in the latter case, they’re pretty much the loudest, and that position just means they’re thoroughly enjoyable, whether for gaming, movies, or apps. Television and… of course even podcasts and similar things.
Again, don’t expect these features to be anything special, but then again, don’t expect them to be nothing special either, they’re great for everyday use and you won’t be disappointed – unless you’re constantly trying to use them in environments. Get pretty loud, but no phone speaker can really survive that.
It should be noted that the Poco F4 GT has the traditional Xiaomi / Redmi / Poco layout, whereby the handset and the top bezel are both outputs for an actual speaker. This means that if you’re talking with the Poco F4 GT in your ear, some of what you hear from the person on the other end will be transmitted through the upper speaker grille into your surroundings, which is inevitable. The result of the setup is obviously that if you use any kind of headphones, this will not cause any problems at all.
Vibration motor
The vibration motor is one of the best out there, but unsurprisingly it’s the “feel it more than hear it” variety that seems to have won the 2020 vibration motor wars for whatever reason. What does this mean in practice? If you’re not touching the phone, if it’s not in active contact with your skin, you’re more likely to miss vibration notifications, even if it’s in the same room as you — and especially if it’s lying on the couch or carpet or similar. . The soft stuff on the tables is a little better, but even there, if you’re a few meters away, it’s game over. There just isn’t enough sound in it to call itself attention.
However, if you touch the phone, the engine provides excellent vibrations with a “3D” feeling with great depth. It is very versatile and enjoyable to use, but you need to set the vibration power to maximum. Otherwise, you won’t feel much at all. We’re all for customization and thus aren’t against this scale of power, but when only one end offers anything that remotely makes a sound, we have to wonder what the point is.
Otherwise, in use, it’s still interesting that there are little jolts here and there in the UI that use the vibration engine, but they seem to be fewer and fewer as the months go by, and this is a real fact. Shame because this was one of the big differentiating factors in MIUI’s favor in the real world.
biometric
Poco F4 GT’s fingerprint sensor is embedded in the power button and it’s great. It’s easily among the most accurate we’ve ever used, and it’s also very fast. Our first time unlock rate is limited to 100% and there are only a few misses here and there throughout our time with the phone. There’s really not much to say here – it’s a great fingerprint sensor and we had absolutely no problems with it.
I wish they were all as good as this one, especially the ones under the display. Honestly, if this sensor is any good, we’d take this side-mounted sensor over an on-screen sensor any day. If, like us, you are used to tapping it to unlock your phone, placing it inside the power button also helps a lot. By setting the unlock to press the button rather than just a touch (which in our experience leads to unwanted unlocks), it becomes a very seamless process, turning the screen on and off in one motion.
Of course, there’s also face unlock, and it’s fast and works well, but it only uses the front-facing camera, which means it’s less secure than fingerprint unlock. And you also need to wake up the phone to engage. If you do it by pressing the power button… there’s no time for face unlock to work its magic because the fingerprint scanner has already let you in. Face unlock does its job and very fast too. Let’s note that we checked and found that it only works when your eyes are open.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT screen review
The Poco F4 GT has a decent screen that could easily be great for its price. It’s bright enough to be seen outdoors even on a sunny summer day, though it won’t break any brightness records. Similarly, it gets dark enough that it’s not awkward to use in a black-and-white environment, but we wish more non-native phone makers would use Google’s “Extra Dim” feature in their skins. For those who are sensitive to light, it will be a real boon to be able to dim the screen even further than it is at its lowest setting. Alas, MIUI still has no trace of that feature, I hope it changes in the future.
The automatic brightness curve is perfect in our subjective opinion. We only had to manually adjust it a couple of times where it got a little too bright indoors, but even then, most people were probably fine with what the phone had to offer. It’s always refreshing to use a phone with a good auto-brightness curve for an extended period of time, as one of the minor frustrations (the need to constantly adjust it) is simply not noticeable at all.
In terms of resolution, it’s certainly not a flagship phone. And yet, as we’ve mentioned many times before, most recently in our long-term review of the Xiaomi 12 Pro, we very, very doubt that most people will be able to tell the difference between such a “FHD+” and “QHD+” panel. One in real life, looking at the screen at normal usage intervals. And while you might feel that a gaming phone with a flagship chipset deserves a higher-resolution display, we’re sure that will add to the price tag.
Screen quality and reading mode
Screen quality is excellent, with a native sRGB color mode, although you may struggle to achieve P3 accuracy, as the default Vivid color mode skews whites and grays significantly towards blue. Using a warm preset helps with this, but it also makes everything a bit too yellow.
The Poco F4 GT Reading mode blue light filter is probably the yellowest blue light filter we’ve ever come across. We wouldn’t say this is a downside, but something to keep in mind if you use blue light filters a lot. Most of them will skew orange if you max out the intensity slider. This light is always yellow, and if you’re used to other colors, it might seem confusing at first: it’s very yellow. After a few days, we got used to it and most likely you will get used to it too.
The MIUI Blue Light Filter is still the most comprehensive filter on the market, with all the usual features like the aforementioned intensity slider, timing capabilities (including sunset to sunrise, as well as custom ranges), but it outshines everyone else with its paper texture mode. (with its own separate intensity slider) as well as the ability to display “bright colors” (read: somewhat desaturated) and black and white on the screen. It’s the complete package, it’s a nightmare of blue light, and it’s something we always wish other UIs would be inspired by, even though it hasn’t happened yet.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT refresh rate
The Poco F4 GT display refreshes at 120 Hz. So far so good. However, the way the settings are implemented is very annoying – we’re glad we only had to adjust this once. There’s a default mode that does whatever it wants, and then there’s custom. Only after selecting it you can choose between 60Hz and 120Hz, and in our opinion 120Hz would be a better option. There is no point in buying a phone with a screen with a high refresh rate and not using it.
However, you should note that setting 120Hz here will not cause the panel to always update at 120Hz. This is basically a setting of the maximum allowed, but it is severely mislabeled. Even in this case, the phone goes lower when playing video, inside Google Maps and in the camera app. Games that support high frame rates get the full 120Hz, which is nice to see.
Let’s take a moment here and lament that Google Maps, an application that takes advantage of high refresh rates, is limited to 60Hz. Apart from that, as mentioned earlier, you will only notice the lack of refresh rate in the camera app. Otherwise, it always seems to use the highest refresh rate, which makes for a great user experience.
The display is always on
Unlike what we’ve seen on some Redmi models, the Always-on display can be set to actually be always on. There are other options too – to have it appear on a custom schedule or for ten seconds after a tap. While we’ve enjoyed always-on always-on displays for years, we’ve recently found that we really like the “ten seconds on tap” option since we use our phones so much during the day anyway. Obviously, you might enjoy other settings more. The point is that there are enough options for everyone here.
This continues when it comes to the always-on display look. You get a comprehensive list of analog and digital clocks, as well as different picture backgrounds and the “Kaleidoscope” option, which is always attractive and spectacular. Overall, MIUI’s AOD implementation is still among the most customizable out there, and that’s a good thing in our book – if you don’t want to mess with it too much, you can use the defaults, or you can really fine-tune it. to your preferences if you are so inclined.
The performance and smoothness of the phone
As a gaming phone, Poco F4 GT should perform amazingly. Otherwise, what’s the point, right? We’re happy to report that it does indeed live up to expectations, but only as far as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 will allow. While it’s a true flagship chipset in every way, and will feel like it for any kind of casual use (including casual gaming), it has well-documented overheating issues, and the Poco F4 GT can’t completely escape them. run away It doesn’t matter how big the cooling system is.
Don’t get me wrong, the dual vapor chamber is huge, but put the phone through a throttling test and after a few (about ten) minutes, it drops down to about two-thirds without fail. So this is a typical feature of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. So, if you’re a professional gamer who needs all the performance at all times, we suggest choosing a device with a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chip inside – and that’s thermally improved.
For anyone who isn’t a heavy pro gamer, all of the above won’t matter, as the Poco F4 GT still feels very much like a premium device in use, no matter what you use it for. From throttling tests to long heavy gaming sessions.
With that in mind, let’s gently turn our attention to the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT, everyone’s favorite subjective “metric” that isn’t easily obtained from the specs tab. The Poco F4 GT is one of the smoothest phones we’ve ever used for a long-term review. In fact, it is tied for second place with the Xiaomi 12 Pro. The OnePlus 10 Pro still has a very slight edge, but the Poco is nothing to scoff at. The software is smoother than other smartphones on the market, which is why we’ve enjoyed using it on a daily basis.
Checking the battery life and charging of Poco F4 GT phone
The Poco F4 GT showed admirable longevity throughout the time we got to know it for this long-term review. Battery life has been excellent with our use case described below. We never ran out of battery at the end of the day, and always managed at least 6 hours of screen-on time. On some good days, we’ve seen over 7 hours, and while that’s not at the top of the charts, it’s pretty close.
The best battery life we’ve seen so far with similar long-term review use is over 7 hours of screen-on time every day, and over 8 hours in some cases. The Poco isn’t quite there, but it’s close, and it’s been incredibly consistent every day – we haven’t seen any weird ups and downs. That’s certainly commendable, but far more exciting than battery life is charging time.
Even though we’re starting to see 100W+ wired charging systems in various smartphones, there’s still no telling how much peace of mind these systems can give you — and in the case of the Poco F4 GT, it’s peace of mind. Highest battery life ever.
Typical usage of the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT includes about 12 to 16 hours off the charger each day, with a Wi-Fi 6 connection, about an hour or more of 5G mobile data, always-on location, and half an hour to an hour of GPS navigation. Via Waze, bluetooth always on and about an hour or two of listening to music or podcasts through the TWS headphones each day, as well as about an hour of phone calls.
With this kind of usage, we never needed to charge midday, but even if your use case is much more demanding (for example, a mobile data connection where the signal isn’t great), all you need is the charger and cable that comes with you in the box. has it. Zero to full takes an insane 17 minutes if you hit the boost button after plugging in, and about 20-21 minutes if you don’t.
It’s so fast that it’s impossible not to be around an outlet for at least a long time at some point during the day, so “range anxiety,” if we may borrow a term from the EV space, should definitely not be a thing at all. With this phone if only everything was the same for cars…but we digress.
There’s no wireless charging because you’d have to cut some corners to get to this price point, but with wired charging this fast, you can’t say we’re missing out.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT software review
Poco is part of the Xiaomi family. As such, unfortunately, all of our usual software tips for Xiaomi and Redmi phones apply here as well. We are primarily talking about the update track. Our Poco F4 GT European review unit is currently running MIUI 13.0.7 based on Android 12 with the August 2022 security patch.
We don’t blame Poco for not rolling out the Android 13 update earlier—few companies that aren’t Google haven’t. Also, as usual, we should note that MIUI is such a heavy shell that most of the user interface changes that Google introduces in each new version of Android don’t even make significant changes. Everything is nice and stylish. But a security patch level that is more than three months out of date? This is simply unacceptable.
Xiaomi, Poco and Redmi simply need to improve in this area. We understand that issuing monthly security updates to all devices is a lot of work. But at least for the flagships, this should be done, and let’s not forget that the F4 GT is currently Poco’s top phone.
As for that Android 13 update – it will probably happen. In 2023, most likely. Should it be less to get the latest version of the main operating system for the current flagship device of this brand? Certainly. Will Xiaomi, Redmi, and Poco care enough about this to invest the necessary resources to make major updates faster? Well, you know what they say. But based on how things have been so far, it’s unlikely. That investment has to come from somewhere, and consistently having the cheapest phones compared to the competition isn’t a recipe for huge profit margins, is it?
So here’s the bottom line – you’ll pay less for the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT than a similarly specced Samsung, sometimes significantly less, and less in the way of software updates. Exhibition? It’s your personal call to make, but we wanted to make the situation as clear as possible.
MIUI 13
Now that that’s out of the way, let’s turn our attention to MIUI 13. This is… MIUI 13. It looks like MIUI 12.5, which was similar to MIUI 12 before it. We’ve been saying this for a while now – MIUI needs a new coat of paint right now. It’s been years of incremental improvements now, which we appreciate, but it’s getting a little old.
Of course, we say this as phone reviewers who have already seen MIUI 13 on a dozen or so devices. If you have no experience with it, you will definitely not get bored with it. But even on a more objective level, the design language has been the same for a while – maybe it’s time for a rethink? Even Apple did this when it introduced Dynamic Island this year.
Functionally, it has all the bits and pieces you’d expect in a modern Android skin. There are parts of MIUI that are incredibly customizable – like the reading mode blue light filter and the always-on display, which we’ve talked about before, for example. There are a lot of built-in features, and as a result, some of them can be hard to find for the average user who spends hours in the settings figuring out where they are.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT launcher
The launcher is traditional Poco fare, with a bunch of options, but not so much that it becomes overwhelming to navigate through the settings. We’ve always thought it struck a good balance between not being simplistic (looking at you, Google) and not being overly confusing (something many third-party options can be guilty of).
Of course, as you’d expect in 2022, there’s an app drawer, and it even comes with some fairly neat options, some of which we really enjoy (app suggestions above), and others that never quite hit the mark. we have not seen (app handles) – but it’s possible, and if you do, they’re there. We like that there’s an option for the AZ navigation bar, as in our experience this is usually the fastest way to get to any particular app in the drawer, much faster than searching or scrolling manually, though keep in mind that this is for Those who like us have more than 200 apps installed.
A word of caution if you’re copying your data from another device – the setting to put new apps on the home screen seems to have random default behavior in the latest versions of MIUI. Sometimes it is off by default, as it should be. Other times, it’s on – and if you don’t check, hundreds of apps may be automatically added to your home screen after the data copying process is complete. If you like your device to be as close to iPhone in terms of user experience as possible, you will enjoy it. Otherwise, you should take a look at the launcher settings as soon as possible when you boot your phone for the first time.
Fortunately, this build of MIUI has an option to display your recent apps in a horizontal scrolling list, although it’s not enabled by default. MIUI still insists on a two-column menu with vertical scrolling by default, and if you like that – great. Otherwise, like us, you’ll immediately switch to another way of doing things because it’s definitely a more familiar one, considering how every other shell out there implements a similar mechanism.
New control center, dark mode, RGB LED
Like all recent versions of MIUI, this version also includes the “new” Control Center, a very obvious rip-off of the iOS feature of the same name. Despite the lack of originality in its design, this works very well, but while we initially tried it on for good measure, we ended up going back to the “old” way of doing things. It makes more sense to us to have both notifications accessible, and Quick Settings toggles on the same screen – not to mention that because Quick Settings occupies the top of that screen, notifications are actually easier to access without complicated finger movements.
Swiping down from the left for notifications also doesn’t make sense to us because we’re right-handed, but if we were left-handed, we’d probably have the exact opposite view. As it is, between notifications and controls, we have to reach for the first mode a lot more during the day, and swiping down from the left side is more uncomfortable if you’re holding the phone in your right hand with your right thumb. Of course, you may disagree, which is why you can follow the new system if you prefer it.
Naturally, there’s also a dark mode, and here it’s a simple on/off affair, with no fancy “darkness levels” options like ColorOS and its derivatives. However, it works well, it can be scheduled (either with a custom interval or from sunset to sunrise), and in theory, it can even be forced into apps that don’t have one of their own. However, in practice there is only one app you can do this for.
That‘s great because that app is really in dire need of a dark theme, but in the past, features like this worked with every app — for whatever reason, not anymore, and the selection always looks great. limited We don’t know what’s going on here, but we can assure you that Amazon wasn’t the only app we installed that didn’t have its own dark theme.
Since this is a gaming phone, it can’t do without RGB LED action, and there are actually two LED strips inside the camera island that can be set to light up when charging, as well as for incoming calls.
The LEDs can be used on a custom schedule, and they also work with Game Turbo if you want to – although if you’re playing, you won’t actually see them, so that’s on the agenda. contract. In our opinion, to let the people around you know that you have a gaming phone. By the way, Game Turbo is also where you do your custom mapping for popup triggers.
Gesture navigation
Gesture navigation is as you’d expect on the Poco F4 GT and works great, as it always does in MIUI. If you don’t enjoy looking at that eyesore too much, you can optionally remove the pointless white “pill” bar at the bottom.
There are other gestures, and we’ll get to those in a bit, but first let’s understand how the gesture shortcuts menu in Settings includes gestures and button presses in a rather confusing way.
That aside, this is one of those menus that we imagine most people will never access, but there are some neat things inside. You can set Google Assistant to long press the power button, set the camera to launch with a double press of the power button or the volume down button, or both, and make the LED flash shine like a torch . Press the power button, then there’s an option to double- or triple-tap the back of the phone for specific things — like taking a screenshot, accessing Control Center or the notification shade, opening the calculator app, going to silent mode, etc. A list of similar items can also be set up by double-tapping the fingerprint sensor.
These are all undeniable features – but once you know they’re there, they might come in handy in your day-to-day life, which is why we wanted to shed some light on this menu and its contents. You can even set some popup triggers by double-tapping as well as long-pressing. Although this is a more limited list you can choose from here – you can launch the camera, record video, record the screen, record audio, turn on the flashlight, go to silent mode and change the vibration give
Why are the options here more limited compared to what you can choose from for the back tap or fingerprint sensor? who knows. Why these features in particular? Again, they’re obviously a small subset of what the phone can do, and we can’t say we fully understand how to choose them, but we think having these options is better than not. And since none of these are on by default, it’s not like they’re going to get in the way of easily using the box or anything.
Back to the triggers, you can assign them one of four sound effects that go off every time you open them and a color animation, just in case you need to play up the fact that you have a gaming phone. room without uttering a single word
Bugs
Unfortunately, our time with the Poco F4 GT wasn’t without its glitches, as we ran into a few issues. Unfortunately this is becoming a recurring issue with Xiaomi / Redmi / Poco stable devices, and we hope the companies are planning to improve software quality control in the near future – it’s definitely needed.
Especially since the updates are so infrequent – it usually takes months for a new one to appear, which means at least that’s how long you’ll have to live with whatever new bug one introduces. This is another reason why more updates are recommended, but so far, these three brands have gone their own way.
Before we begin, let’s just add the usual caveat – depending on how you use your phone, you may or may not care about one or more of these bugs. We list all the issues we found to give you an accurate idea of what life is like with this phone. If you don’t care about any of them, great! But if one or more are important to you, you might want to wait for future updates to fix them before getting this phone.
The biggest bug for us was the Do Not Disturb (DND) mode, which simply didn’t work as it should. This is what happened to us during our time with the Xiaomi 12 Pro, which we also recently reviewed long-term, so this appears to be a fairly common issue with the latest MIUI 13 builds. We summarize the problem: DND mode should silence all notifications and allow only the “interruptions” you set. We did our usual setup, scheduled DND for when we’re asleep and only let calls through – and yet we still heard every single notification. Not much else to say about it – it simply doesn’t work.
Next, the sound quality via Bluetooth. There are some serious issues with the Dolby Atmos implementation on this phone, and unfortunately we can’t tell you exactly what they are. But what we can say is that we’ve never had to deal with Dolby Atmos settings before on any phone that supports Atmos. It’s generally on by default, and we left it that way, never touched the defaults, and everything was great.
We initially went the same route on the Poco F4 GT, but music sounded terrible through an array of speakers, headphones, and Bluetooth headphones. It was, for lack of a better word, much smaller than any phone we’re used to. And also much quieter. Note that we did not change any settings on the speakers or headphones before starting to use this phone.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT’s music listening experience was marred by any glitches that produced this thin sound that lacked any kind of depth. So, we started fiddling with the Atmos settings (for the first time, on any phone), and eventually found that the Voice was the best preset for our ears, along with a custom EQ that had all the levels on top. . The latter helped with volume, but even with these settings, the quality still wasn’t quite what we’re used to. It’s a strange feeling to get used to music playing a certain way on certain speakers and headphones, regardless of which phone it’s being used with, and then you get a device that changes that significantly, for the worse. Your mileage may obviously vary.
While roaming, we had issues with the Wi-Fi Calling Quick Settings randomly showing up first (left), even after repeatedly manually moving it to another location. We assume this happens every time the phone connects to a different network (which often happens when roaming), but it’s completely unnecessary behavior and therefore, in our opinion, qualifies as a bug.
The pop-up app selector that appears when trying to open a specific file type seems broken, as tapping the More option doesn’t actually give you the app list as it should. Instead, it randomly selects a program for you and immediately opens said file in that program. This was maddening at first because the app we wanted was never on the home screen, but it seemed to fix itself over time without any software updates. So with that in mind, you may or may not ever encounter it.
Finally, a small tip: if you enter Mute/Silence mode, an icon will appear in the status bar to let you know it’s engaged. Everything is fine, but the icon is on the wrong side of the status bar. It’s right next to the clock on the left, where the notification icons would normally be – and this can make it feel like you’re constantly waiting for a notification, even when there isn’t. We’re not sure why other system-related icons can fit on the right side of the status bar, but this one can’t — and the same goes for the NFC icon when it’s on. There’s enough room for both on the right side, no need to get confused about placing them.
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT camera review
Gaming phones usually don’t excel in the camera department because resources are spent elsewhere – RGB LEDs, crazy cooling systems, “gaming looks”, that sort of thing. Or maybe gamers don’t care about the camera? At least this seems to be the thinking of smartphone manufacturers. We can’t confirm that, but we wanted to mention all of this so you have reasonable expectations going into this part of our review.
Let’s be clear: the Poco F4 GT’s cameras will never compete with existing flagships in terms of raw image quality. There’s no way you can get it for this price and still get all the bells and whistles of the game.
With that said, let’s quickly point out that the camera app is the MIUI fare found on seemingly every Xiaomi, Redmi, and Poco device, so if you’ve ever used it, you’ll feel right at home. And even if you’ve only used other brands, camera apps these days are so similar that you’ll have no problem adjusting within minutes.
image quality
Now, on to our samples. The Poco F4 GT’s main camera is a 64-megapixel unit, which isn’t the biggest camera out there, and it doesn’t have optical image stabilization (OIS). The latter means that very long exposures at night require very steady hands or end up with blurry photos. The software knows this, so selfies with automatic night mode are very fast. Even the handheld night mode shots are some of the fastest we’ve ever seen.
But let’s start with daily examples. The primary snapper here is capable of outputting decent images that aren’t amazing but are still quite commendable. The level of detail is good, noise is kept to a minimum (although it can occasionally creep in), the dynamic range is very average, and there’s a good amount of contrast.
Colors on the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT can be oversaturated, more so than flagship devices usually do – this has been a recurring theme, where the lower the price of a phone, the more intense the color display. After all, most people like pops of color, so even though these colors are by no means natural, they might be pleasing to your eyes. We think they’re a bit high, but if they’re not high enough for you, turn on the AI switch. You will either be impressed or disgusted by the results, but one thing is for sure – it will definitely elicit a strong response.
The 8-megapixel ultra-wide camera looks like an unremarkable proposition without autofocus – so no macro shooting of it. However, there’s a dedicated 2MP macro camera, which we haven’t used yet because its output is too low-res to be usable in most scenarios. If you simply must have some, check out the samples included in our regular review of the Poco F4 GT.
Anyway, back to ultrawide mode. Its daily shots are quite average, as the hardware shows. The level of detail is decent, the dynamic range is acceptable most of the time, and the colors are acceptable, but sometimes they can veer too much towards magenta.
Press the 2x zoom button in the viewfinder, and you’ll get images that look acceptable on a phone screen, but nothing more. Sure, they might be used for a quick social media share here and there where quality isn’t too important, but otherwise, this camera system definitely invites you to “zoom with your feet” whenever you can. . That’s not surprising as there’s no dedicated zoom lens on the Poco F4 GT, and no fancy ‘Super Res Zoom’ here either – it’s just a crop from the center of the main sensor.
At night, Auto mode on the main camera with Bright Night Auto mode produces nice-looking photos with good dynamic range, similar daytime colors, good detail in well-lit areas, and low noise. On the other hand, shadows are too dark and lack detail.
Enter the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT’s manual Night Mode, and with a good boost in shadows, you’ll get much sharper images that look sharper as a result. The differences between Night Auto and Night Mode are steady, so we recommend switching to Night Mode whenever you have the time (provided you have the steady hands you need to shoot). On the other hand, Auto Night Mode is a definite plus for Auto Mode, so we’ll turn it on for when you’re in a rush.
The ultra-wide camera is predictably bad at night. Auto night mode doesn’t work for it, so it doesn’t overexpose while severely under-exposing highlights. You will only find these useful if you like the “atmospheric” look or whatever you want to call it.
The manual night mode helps, as it turns everything on, but at the cost of overall smoothness. We recommend avoiding ultra-wide mode in low-light situations, but if you insist on using it, night mode is the way to go – provided you have steady hands, as each shot takes a few seconds.
The 2x night shots also lack automatic night mode functionality, resulting in shots with blown-out highlights and very dark shadows, which is far from ideal. If you look closely, you will also hardly miss a “watercolor effect”.
This, unfortunately, does not go away when using night mode, but at least it restores the highlights to some extent and enhances the shadows somewhat. Unfortunately, it oversharpens everything, so it’s all a trade-off. We recommend avoiding 2x mode and simply “zoom with your feet” if needed and it can be done. Otherwise, it’s impossible to tell which 2x mode is better, as each has its own unique drawbacks.
Selfies are good, if not outstanding. During the day, you get excellent dynamic range, pleasing (if not quite natural) colors and accurate skin tones. The level of detail is good but not great. If you zoom in, you’ll see a lot of smoothness and a lot of sharpening liberally applied. But if you don’t pixelpip, these are mostly pretty usable.
Portrait mode photos deliver with good subject detection, although separation sometimes fails here and there. At night, the screen flash is your friend, as it’s not as bright as many others we’ve used so far. This means that while your face may not be as bright as other phones, you can still make out your surroundings in photos because the face brightness doesn’t wash out everything around it. Taking selfies with screen flash is an exercise in patience (and holding still), however, and if you move even a little, it’s bound to get some blur.
Overall the Poco F4 GT cameras are average. As expected based on the specs, the top end is the flagship, but it’s far from even flagship performance. That doesn’t mean it produces bad images – it doesn’t. They are good, but could be better. So if cameras are important to you, this is definitely not the phone for you, but for a casual shot here and there every now and then, it does the job well enough.
Summary
The Poco F4 GT is the first gaming phone we’ve reviewed in a long time, and we didn’t know what to expect. Is it difficult to use for non-gaming stuff? Does it skimp on other features to give you gaming essentials like RGB LEDs and pop-up triggers and a large cooling compartment inside?
As it turns out, yes, but only to an extent. Pop-up clips may not bother you at all, or you may constantly feel like they clutter up the right side of the device unnecessarily. This can be especially true if you’re not a “pro gamer”, and therefore don’t really have much real-world use for them. But if you play the game a lot, they add up, and you probably won’t mind them being there and moving the volume rocker to the left.
In terms of other features to give you a complete gaming package, the cameras are pretty average, and this is one area where this has happened.
The Poco F4 GT came with the top chipset at the time and even paired it with a large vapor chamber for cooling. This, unfortunately, wasn’t enough to completely alleviate the documented overheating problems of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, and it’s still a lot of pressure in intensive games, starting after only a few minutes.
So the weird part about having the first gaming phone for a long-term review is that, if you think about it, it kind of fails in a great gaming phone because of all the pressure. Not bad – don’t get me wrong, but if you’re all about the pro gamer life, you should probably go for a phone with a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 or get an instant cooling attachment. Otherwise, if you’re looking for a high-performance device for anything other than intensive hour-long pro gaming sessions, the Poco F4 GT will suit you well.
The software has been a mixed bag. On the one hand, MIUI has a very unique design language and flourishes here and there in the animations and vibration shakes it uses extensively. On the other hand, the categorization of features in Settings seems almost random at times, and the Settings menu itself is huge and hard to navigate. We also think the leather might be overdue for a new coat of paint, but you might disagree.
Similarly, we feel that software support – when it comes to updates – is sorely lacking. Every few months an update doesn’t match some of Poco’s competitors, and things get worse because the updates are far from bug-free. So if you encounter a new bug, you are stuck with it for months.
Speaking of which, there are a few MIUI bugs that we encountered on the Poco F4 GT. So we hope that Xiaomi, Redmi and Poco will invest more in software quality control in the very near future, while realizing that the current price may be unsustainable in the long term. After all, it’s all a trading game.
Battery life on the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT has been excellent – not the best we’ve seen, but not far off. And even if your use case is much more compact than ours and you need a quick charge during the day, it won’t be a problem thanks to Super Fast Charging. It’s still amazing to this day to see a device go from scratch to full in less than 20 minutes! The fingerprint scanner is one of the most accurate we’ve ever used, the vibration motor is among the best, and the speaker performance is helped a lot by their gaming-friendly position (which we bet has a lot of media consumption, too. Friendly, too). .
The screen is pretty good, but not among the best out there – understandable at this price. The resolution similarly isn’t as good as the flagships, but we really don’t think anyone will notice the difference in real life without looking for it. While the Poco F4 GT looks like a gaming phone on closer inspection, it won’t really stand out from a distance if you have it in a different color that isn’t yellow – and that might be something you’ll appreciate.
The bottom line is that the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is a very good phone, just not one that excels at its unique selling point. We recommend looking at this phone as a very affordable phone with a flagship chipset, and consider the gaming features as the odd bonus on the side. You should also be able to enjoy the absolutely amazing camera system. That being said, mid-range cameras are pretty much par for the “flagship killer” or “affordable flagship” space, and the Poco F4 GT would probably be best described as a flagship killer with a gaming twist.
If you want to feel different, but not so different that you feel uncomfortable, that’s great. It delivers very well in some areas (battery life, screen quality, handling, speakers), in others (smoothness, charging speed, vibration motor, fingerprint sensor) and still not so much in others. Camera image quality, stable performance). It’s definitely an oddball package, but some people are oddballs with oddball needs, and if you match what the Poco F4 GT can offer, you’ll have a great time.
Source: GSMARENA.COM
You may like
Technology
Unveiling of OpenAI new artificial intelligence capabilities
Published
2 days agoon
14/05/2024OpenAI claims that its free GPT-4o model can talk, laugh, sing, and see like a human. The company is also releasing a desktop version of ChatGPT’s large language model.
Unveiling of OpenAI new artificial intelligence capabilities
Natural human-computer interaction
What exactly does the introduction of this model mean for users?
Strong market for generative artificial intelligence
Samsung S95B OLED TV review
What can be placed in a container with a depth of 4 mm? For example, 40 sheets of paper or 5 bank cards; But to think that Samsung has successfully packed a large 4K OLED panel into a depth of less than 4mm that can produce more than 2000 nits of brightness is amazing. Join me as I review the Samsung S95B TV.
Samsung has a very active presence in the smartphone OLED display market, and by the way, it also has some of the best and most stunning small OLED panels in its repertoire; But surprisingly, it has been a little more than a year since he seriously entered the OLED TV market; Of course, Samsung launched its first OLED TV in 2013 and quickly withdrew from the large-size OLED market and left the field to its traditional and long-standing rival, LG.
In the years after withdrawing from the OLED TV market, Samsung focused on the evolution of LCD TVs with technologies such as Quantum Dot and MiniLED; But after almost 10 years, Samsung decided to once again try its luck in the world of OLEDs, and thus, in 2022, it launched the S95B TV in two 55-inch and 65-inch models.
In 2023, Samsung introduced the S95C TV as a successor to the S95B and unveiled the S95D model at CES 2024; While Samsung’s 2024 TV has just been launched in international markets a few months after its launch, it is still hard to find its 2023 model in the Iranian market. Accordingly, we have prepared the 65-inch S95B model from 2022 for review. It is more numerous than the 2023 model in the market of the country.
Slim design… super slim
What draws attention to Samsung TV at first sight is not its eye-catching image and ear-pleasing sound, but its infinite slimness. The S95B was so slim that when I unboxed and installed it, I experienced the same level of anxiety I had on exam night! Samsung OLED TV is only 3.89 mm thick; For this reason, despite all the company’s efforts in strengthening the body, it still simply shakes and sways.
Samsung calls the ultra-slim design of its TV LaserSlim; Because the laser beam is narrow and sharp; So you should be very careful when installing the TV. I wish we knew what is the logic behind the childish efforts of companies to make the world’s thinnest TV. To some extent, the narrowness of the TV helps to make it more modern and better installed on the wall; But the strength of the TV should not be sacrificed to make it thinner.
Samsung designers have not spared even the edges of the TV! The width of the edges around the panel does not exceed 8 mm. The narrowness of the edges helps the user to immerse well in the depth of black and the extraordinary contrast of the OLED TV panel and enjoy the content to the fullest.
The S95B TV has a high-quality and well-made body, the frame of the device is metal, and like most OLED TVs in the market, there is a wide plastic protrusion in the lower half of which parts such as the board, speakers, and power supply are placed. Due to this protrusion, the thickness of the body reaches 4.1 cm in the maximum state.
Unfortunately, just like LG’s OLED TVs, the base of the S95B is also located in the middle of the device; Although the base itself is metal and relatively wide; the large dimensions of the TV and its very small thickness make it not to be firmly and firmly placed on the table and not to wobble; Of course, you can install the TV on the wall with a 300×200 mm VESA mount.
All the ports of the S95B TV, including HDMI and USB, are included in the plastic protrusion on the back of the device. These ports are covered with a plastic screen to integrate and beautify the back of the device. After installing it, surprisingly, you won’t be able to access the ports! Samsung TV ports are as follows:
- Four HDMI 2.1 ports with the ability to transfer 4K120 image signal; Two ports facing down and two ports on the side of the frame
- Two USB 2.0 ports on the side of the frame
- A network port
- Internal and external receiver input
- An optical audio output
One of the HDMI ports (number 3) has eARC capability and can be used to connect the device to the soundbar. USB ports are also different in terms of current and voltage; One of the ports is limited to 0.5 amps and 5 volts and the other is limited to 1.0 amps and 5 volts; Therefore, it is considered a more reasonable option for connecting an external hard drive.
Stunning brightness and disappointing color accuracy
I mentioned earlier that we had the 65-inch S95B model available for review. With such dimensions, you can enjoy the 4K resolution of the panel the most if you sit at a distance of about 2 meters from the TV; At closer distances, pixels can be separated, and at distances greater than 2 meters, your brain’s perception of a 4K image will be no different from a 1080p image.
The Samsung S95B TV uses a 10-bit OLED panel with a resolution of 4K or 2160 x 3840 pixels and can display more than a billion colors. Supporting this number of colors is essential to provide an optimal experience of HDR content playback. In the following, I will explain more about the compatibility of Samsung TVs with HDR standards and the quality of color display.
Unlike LCD panels, where the light needed by the pixels is provided by a number of LED lights on the edge or back of the panel, in OLED panels, each pixel provides its own light; As if instead of a limited number of exposure areas, for example 500-600 in MiniLED TVs, we have more than 8 million exposure areas; Thus, to display the color black, the pixels are turned off, so that instead of a spectrum of gray color, we see a deep black and experience an extremely high contrast.
The absence of any Blooming thanks to the precise control of light in the TV’s OLED panel
The great advantage of self-lit pixels (pixels that provide their own light) in displaying deep black and preventing the Blooming phenomenon (creating a halo around bright subjects in a dark background) thanks to the very precise control of the light distribution, also has some weaknesses; The greater vulnerability to burn-in phenomenon during long-term static image display and the lower level of OLED panel brightness compared to MiniLED samples are among these weaknesses.
Like other OLED TVs, the S95B TV is not immune to the risk of burn-in. In order to reduce the possibility of this phenomenon, the Koreans have considered solutions such as moving the image slightly in different time periods. Unfortunately, we do not have the possibility to examine the TVs for a long time to evaluate their performance in preventing the risk of burn-in; But at least based on RTINGS’ long-term and unrealistic test, the S95B seems to be more vulnerable compared to its competitors; However, in real use, it is unlikely that a user would want to watch TV with such intensity.
To overcome the inherent weakness of OLED panels in achieving higher levels of brightness, Samsung engineers have combined quantum dot technology with OLED panels. Quantum dots are very small crystal particles that are layered in the heart of the display panel. With the help of the quantum dot layer, the panels achieve higher brightness and produce more vivid colors. Samsung calls its combined panel QD-OLED and claims that with the help of the Neural Quantum processor in the heart of the S95B TV, this panel can raise the brightness to a higher level than its competitors.
Samsung S95B 65-inch TV brightness with default settings |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Image modes/pattern white percentage |
10 percent |
50 percent |
100 percent |
|
SDR |
Dynamic |
1065 |
633 |
364 |
Standard |
740 |
487 |
281 |
|
Movie |
430 |
399 |
229 |
|
HDR |
Dynamic |
2094 |
— |
— |
Standard |
2179 |
— |
— |
|
Movie |
2179 |
— |
— |
|
FILMMAKER Mode |
2175 |
— |
— |
In my measurements, when only 10% of the screen was lit and the device was playing a normal SDR image, the brightness of the S95B panel reached 1100 nits in the highest mode, which is a very good number and better than the brightness of the C2 and C3 TVs in the same conditions, respectively. It is about 300 and 100 nits more.
Aside from the S95B’s excellent performance in SDR image brightness, the real magic happens when the device is playing HDR video. In this situation, when 10% of the screen is lit, the brightness reaches a stunning number of about 2200 nits, which is 700 nits more than the HDR brightness of the C2 and C3 TVs. Achieving such a level of brightness helps the TV to deliver a stunning HDR movie viewing experience.
Comparison of brightness and contrast of S95B with other TVs |
||
---|---|---|
TV/parameter (the brightest profile) |
Brightness (50% pattern) |
contrast |
Samsung S95B |
633 |
∞ |
LG C3 |
603 |
∞ |
LG QNED80 |
580 |
116 |
LG NANO84 |
295 |
149 |
LG C2 |
525 |
∞ |
LG QNED96 |
470 |
— |
Note that the stunning numbers of 1100 and 2200 nits are obtained when a small part of the screen is bright, which is often the case in movies and series, and the entire image is not full of bright colors; But when the whole screen is lit; For example, consider a scene from The Lord of the Rings where we see Galadriel in the land of the elves, in such a situation, the maximum brightness of the whole screen is about 370 nits, which is still 40 nits higher than the LG TV.
Thanks to the panel’s excellent brightness and the deep blacks produced by the muted pixels, it’s no surprise that the Samsung TV’s image contrast is superb; Especially since there is an anti-reflective coating on the panel so that you can enjoy the image even in bright environments; Note that unlike what comes from the corners of the panel, you should not remove this anti-reflective layer from the panel; Otherwise, you will face problems like us!
If you think that the S95B is the best TV on the market so far, I must say that not everything about the S95B is rosy.
The S95B TV provides the user with the following four color profiles, all of which tend to be very cold by default and do not produce very accurate colors.
- Dynamic
- Movie
- Standard
- FILMMAKER Mode
Like most OLED TVs on the market, the S95B TV also covers a wide range of colors. In my tests, the Samsung TV managed to cover about 148% of the sRGB color space, nearly 100% of the DCI P3 wide space, and 75% of the Rec 2020 ultra-wide space. These numbers are great, But the disappointing thing is the very low accuracy of the device in producing the mentioned colors with factory settings.
Samsung S95B 65-inch TV performance in covering color spaces with default settings |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Image mode/color space |
sRGB |
DCI-P3 |
Rec. 2020 |
|||
cover |
mean error |
cover |
mean error |
cover |
mean error |
|
Dynamic |
146 |
— |
98.6 |
13.7 |
77.9 |
— |
Standard |
147.7 |
— |
99.7 |
12.1 |
78.7 |
— |
Movie |
125.4 |
— |
89.5 |
4.6 |
65.5 |
— |
FILMMAKER Mode |
121.9 |
— |
89.5 |
4.1 |
64.6 |
— |
Note that the FILMMAKER mode belongs to the UHD union and most big companies like Samsung, LG and Hisense use it in their TVs. On paper, with FILMMAKER mode, we should see movies as the director intended.
Comparison of Samsung S95B color accuracy with other TVs (default settings) |
||
---|---|---|
TV/parameter (the most accurate profile) |
DCI P3 |
|
Covering |
Color accuracy |
|
Samsung S95B |
89.5 |
4.1 |
LG C3 |
96.8 |
3.0 |
LG QNED80 |
90.7 |
2.7 |
LG NANO84 |
82.9 |
— |
LG C2 |
98.7 |
2.1 |
LG QNED96 |
90.8 |
3.9 |
The most accurate colors of the S95B TV are depicted by the FILMMAKER Mode profile with an error of 4.1, in which the TV covers about 90% of the DCI P3 color space; As a comparison, in the review of the C3 TV, the color display error in the same FILMMAKER mode was 3.6 and in the most accurate color profile it was 3.0; Therefore, Samsung TV does not have an interesting performance in terms of factory calibration of colors.
We were so surprised by the results that we returned the TV and got another S95B to review, But the results did not change.
Fortunately, Samsung TV provides you with various settings to change parameters such as gamma, color temperature, color hue, and brightness limiter (ABL) so that you can achieve your desired style and style for displaying colors; For example, I was able to reduce the color display error in the Standard profile from a terrible number of 12.1 to a very good number of 3.0 by making the following changes.
Color accuracy of S95B TV after minor changes in panel settings |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Image mode/color space |
DCI-P3 |
||
Settings |
Average error (recommended: less than 3) |
Color temperature (neutral: 6500 K) |
|
Standard |
default settings |
12.1 |
14236 |
ABL: Off Contrast Enhancer: Low Gamma: 2.2 |
3.0 |
8180 |
Another weakness of Samsung S95B TV compared to LG OLEDs is that it does not support HDR videos with Dolby Vision standard; The iPhone, for example, records HDR video using the same standard. Samsung TV supports HDR10, HDR10+, and HLG standards.
Like other OLED TVs, the Samsung S95B TV has wide viewing angles, and even from the corners, it displays colors with the least drop in freshness; So if you use wide furniture at home, you can safely go to S95B.
Samsung has focused a lot on the gaming capabilities of its TV; The device uses a 120 Hz panel with support for FreeSync Premium and G-Sync technologies, and the TV itself provides the user with Game Mode, which, by activating it, significantly reduces Input Lag, makes available a variable refresh rate, and The frames of the games can also be seen.
Samsung compensates for the visual weaknesses of the S95B TV with the amazing listening experience of its powerful speakers; While a TV like the LG C3 uses 40-watt speakers, Samsung engineers have used 60-watt speakers with a 2.2.2 channel combination in the S95B’s slim body; In the sense that two speakers throw the sound down, two speakers throw the sound up, and two woofers are responsible for producing low frequencies.
The S95B TV supports Dolby Atmos surround sound and its sound output is considered excellent for a TV; The volume is high, you can hear the pounding bass, and at high volumes, the distortion is controlled at a reasonable level.
Tizen; The user interface is more limited and different from competitors
Finally, we must avoid the TV user interface; Samsung’s OLED TV, like the rest of the company’s TVs, uses the Tizen operating system. The user interface of the device is smooth and smooth, moving between different menus of the user interface is done without problems, although sometimes with a little slowness; But the device can play most of the video formats.
A number of functions are also available, which doubles the enjoyment of the TV experience, provided that the user uses a Samsung phone; For example, you can run the Samsung phone’s desktop mode or Dex on the TV and use the phone’s screen as a trackpad. The phone can even be used as a webcam to make video calls with Google Mate on the TV.
If you want to write a text, you can call Microsoft365 from the Workspace section of the user interface by connecting a Bluetooth mouse and keyboard to the Samsung TV and start writing in Microsoft Word software.
Samsung Internet Browser is available in the S95B TV user interface; But the Samsung remote control, despite its compact design and the possibility of being charged with a solar panel or USB-C port, does not have the ability to use a mouse; So you have to browse the web with the arrow keys of the remote control; In my opinion, this is one of the main weaknesses of Samsung TV compared to LG TV with its practical magic remote.
As another weakness, we should mention Samsung’s not very rich store; For example, you can’t find some useful apps like Spotify or native apps like Filmo in the Samsung TV store.
Read more: How to connect to the TV with a Samsung phone?
Without a doubt, the S95B is one of the most stunning TVs we’ve ever reviewed on Zoomit; An attractive and extremely slim device that will amaze you with its stunning brightness and contrast, impressive gaming capabilities, and very powerful speakers.
In terms of factory color calibration, the S95B appears below expectations and a bit disappointing; So, if you are not very fond of the image and do not know much about color parameters, you will have to start with inaccurate and very cold colors; But if you are aware of the color parameters, you can change them and enjoy the attractive picture of the TV to the fullest.
The S95B TV is one of Samsung’s 2022 flagships, and now its 65-inch model is sold in the price range of 105 million Tomans; In this range, go for the more updated LG C3 TV with more accurate colors, or for a little more money, choose the Sony A80L TV for 2023, which is powered by a more practical Android operating system; In addition, C2 TV is also available at a price of 10 million less than in 2022.
what is your opinion? Do you think the S95B is a reasonable choice or do you prefer other models from LG or Sony?
Pros
- Very high brightness
- 6 powerful speakers
- Very modern and attractive design
- Deep black and excellent contrast
Cons
- Low color accuracy with default settings
- Too thin and vulnerable body
Technology
MacBook Air M3 review; Lovely, powerful and economical
Published
1 week agoon
06/05/2024MacBook Air M3 review; Lovely, powerful and economical
If you are looking for a compact, well-made and high-quality laptop that can be used in daily and light use, the MacBook Air M3 review is not for you; So close the preceding article, visit the Zomit products section and choose one of the stores to buy MacBook Air M1 ; But if you, like me, are excited to read about the developments in the world of hardware and are curious to know about the performance of the M3 chip in the Dell MacBook Air 2024 , then stay with Zoomit.
The design is a copy of the original from the last generation
Almost two years have passed since Apple said goodbye to the familiar and wedge-shaped MacBook Air design; A different design that accompanied this ultrabook from the first day of its birth in 2008; But finally in 2022, with the aim of harmonizing the design language of the Apple laptop family, it was abandoned so that the MacBook Air 2022 will have a similar appearance to the 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pro.
The new MacBook Air is uniform in thickness; But it was slimmer, the screen was bigger, the edges were narrower and the corners were rounded, and a relatively large notch was added to it, whose only existence was to host the device’s 1080p webcam. MacBook Air 2022 also marked the return of the MagSafe magnetic charging port to Apple’s popular Ultrabook.
Previously, in the review of the MacBook Air 2022 with the M2 chip, we have talked comprehensively and deeply about its design and its positive and negative points. I suggest that if you haven’t read the article, you must visit it; Because the MacBook Air M3 is no different from the MacBook Air M2 in terms of appearance, display, or ports.
We also see the same incredibly well-made and metal body of MacBook Air 2022 in the new generation of Apple Ultrabooks; A body that, like the rest of Apple laptops, is carved from an aluminum block instead of the usual method of using aluminum sheets, and for this reason, it has a strong and dense structure so that we do not see the body sinking when pressing the keyboard area or the screen frame swinging.
All the parts of the MacBook Air 2024 are assembled with the utmost care; So that there is no gap between them. As expected, the hinge of the laptop is also well-adjusted so that you don’t need to use two hands to open the laptop door. All in all, the combination of the quality of components and Apple’s exemplary engineering precision, brings an extremely enjoyable and unique feeling to the user while using the MacBook Air.
Just like the previous generation, the new MacBook Air is sold in four colors: gray, silver, dark blue, and cream. One of the flaws that could be found in the design of the MacBook Air 2022 was that fingerprints and grease remained on the body; The item that was more noticeable in dark blue color. Apple says this year it has used a new coating that reduces the severity of this problem. We did not have the 2022 model available for comparison at the time of writing the following review, But traces of fat and finger still remain on the body of the MacBook Air 2024.
Grease and fingerprints on the laptop body
MacBook Air keyboard is among the best examples in the market in terms of arrangement and dimensions, feedback, and key stability; But the matte coating on the keys absorbs the fat of the fingers very quickly, and on the other hand, like other MacBooks, there is a possibility that the matte coating will disappear and the keys will become shiny. Depending on your usage, this can happen very quickly or over time; For example, for me, who is constantly writing, the keys on my MacBook Pro M1 burned out in less than a year.
Apparently, the buyers of used laptops are very sensitive about the keys being electrocuted; Therefore, if you plan to replace your Macbook with another laptop after one or two years, be sure to keep this in mind and use an external keyboard for long typing.
As always, the trackpad is one of the main strengths of any MacBook, and the MacBook Air M3 follows the same rule. The glass trackpad of the device is large in size and has little friction on its surface, it offers flawless, accurate, and smooth performance, and its Fortouch mechanism, which makes it possible to click on the entire surface of the trackpad, is so efficient that after the MacBook, it is impossible to work with the trackpad of any laptop. Another enjoyed.
MacBook Air 2022
The set of MacBook Air 2024 ports is limited and has not changed; On the right side of the device, there is a headphone jack, and the left side of the device hosts two USB4 ports and a MagSafe magnetic charging port. Along with the basic model, Apple provides a relatively small 30-watt adapter with a cloth cable of the same color as the device’s body; But you can also get the laptop with a more powerful 35 or 70-watt adapter, which charges the battery up to 50% within half an hour.
USB4 ports support Thunderbolt 3 standard with a bandwidth of 40 Gbps, But it is not possible to connect external graphics. Both ports also transmit the image signal with the DisplayPort standard. In the new MacBook, if you close the laptop door, you can connect a 6K monitor and a 5K monitor (both 60Hz) to the device at the same time; But with the laptop’s screen on, just like the MacBook Air M2, the image output is limited to a 6K monitor; It is interesting that the Intel version of MacBook Air could output images to two 4K monitors at the same time as its own screen is on!
As in the previous generation, Apple uses Bluetooth version 5.3 in its Ultrabook; But the Wi-Fi module has upgraded the device from Wi-Fi 6 to Wi-Fi 6E, which incompatible networks can increase the communication bandwidth of MacBook Air 2024 with the router and the rest of the devices in the network from 1.2 to 2.4 Gbps.
Attractive display with more attractive competitors
Like most parts of the device, the screen of the new MacBook Air does not change; Of course, in this field, you can’t criticize Apple much, since 2018, when the MacBook Air screen became Retina, it has always been among the best; However, today, with OLED competitors with stunning colors and infinite contrast, Apple’s Retina display no longer has its former glory.
MacBook Air M3 can be purchased just like the previous generation in two 13.6-inch and 15.3-inch models. The pixel density of both versions is a very good number of 224 pixels. With this density, the MacBook Air screen produces a very clear image. So that it is difficult to distinguish the pixels from each other. We have the 13.6-inch MacBook Air M3 with a resolution of 2560 x 1664 pixels available for review.
Unfortunately, unlike the expensive models of MacBook Pro or even Windows Ultrabooks with the same price as Zenbook, the panel of the MacBook Air is 60 Hz and it does not have amazing technologies such as OLED and MiniLED to produce 1000 nits of brightness and extraordinary colors. MacBook Air uses an 8-bit IPS LCD panel with back exposure, which, by using FRC technology, can give the user the feeling of 10-bit panels with a billion colors.
MacBook Air covers the wide DCI P3 color space with high accuracy. The Apple Ultrabook covers 98.4% of this space with an error of 1.9 (an error of less than 3 is ideal), perhaps the only color weakness of the panel can be considered a slight tendency to be cold; However, thanks to the True Tone feature, the device evaluates the ambient light temperature with high accuracy and adjusts the color temperature accordingly to give you a satisfying visual experience.
In our measurements, with a 50% raster standard, we reached a maximum brightness of 443 nits, which in itself is a very good number, and thanks to the anti-reflective coating on the panel surface, in environments with different light conditions, it brings a satisfactory experience of working with a laptop. Without the appearance of the shadow of the environment on the panel, the user will not be bothered.
MacBook Air 2024 screen performance against other laptops |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laptop / test |
White image |
Black image |
contrast ratio |
AdobeRGB |
sRGB |
DCI-P3 |
||||
Maximum brightness |
Minimum brightness |
Average brightness |
Native |
cover |
Average error |
cover |
Average error |
cover |
Average error |
|
MacBook Air 2024 |
443 intentions |
0.00 nits |
0.67 nits |
661 |
87.9 |
— |
100 |
2.4 |
98.4 |
1.9 |
Zenbook 14 |
512 intention (788 nits HDR) |
0.27 nits |
0 intentions |
∞ |
89.6 |
2.6 |
100 |
0.6 |
99.7 |
1.3 |
MacBook Pro 2022 |
437 intentions |
0.00 nits |
0.5 nits |
874 |
86.3 |
— |
99.8 |
2.7 |
97.5 |
— |
MacBook Air 2022 |
447 intentions |
0.1 nit |
0.65 nits |
693 |
87.5 |
— |
100 |
2.5 |
98.1 |
— |
Galaxy Book 3 Ultra |
441 intentions |
4 intentions |
0 intentions |
∞ |
97.3 |
3.7 |
99.6 |
1.9 |
99.8 |
2.3 |
MacBook Pro M1 Max |
455 intentions (1497 nits HDR) |
0 intentions |
0 intentions |
∞ |
85 |
— |
121.6 |
— |
97.3 |
2.5 |
In addition to the reasonable maximum brightness of 442 nits in bright images, unlike most laptops with IPS LCD screens, the black color brightness is also very low in the MacBook Air display; So that the device achieves a very high contrast. On the other hand, the minimum brightness of the display was 0 nits even with the 0.01 nits accuracy of the Zoomit luminance meter; In the sense that while using the laptop, there will be a little pressure on your eyes.
The attractive screen of the MacBook Air is completed by a set of 4 speakers; Speakers that have a very large sound volume compared to the size of a laptop, produce clear sound, and at high volumes, they are confused and distorted. MacBook Air speakers support Dolby Atmos and are easily ahead of most Windows laptops.
M3 chip and championship called TSMC
The main changes of MacBook Air 2024 have happened in its heart; Where it hosts the M3 chip as the beating heart of the device. Next, before we put the performance of the M3 under the microscope, we take a look at the details of the technical specifications of this chip.
The M3 chip is manufactured using TSMC’s 3nm-based manufacturing process known as N3B, hosts 25 billion transistors on its surface, and uses the same layout and configuration as the M2 for the CPU and GPU cores. Apple says the processor and graphics used in the M3 are about 35 and 65 percent faster than the M1, respectively.
Technical specifications of M3 against M2 and M1 |
|||
---|---|---|---|
parameters/chip |
Apple M3 |
Apple M2 |
Apple M1 |
manufacturing process |
3 nanometer N3B TSMC |
TSMC’s second-generation 5nm |
5 nm N5 TSMC |
CPU |
4 powerful cores with a maximum frequency of 4.05 GHz 4 low-power cores with a maximum frequency of 2.75 GHz |
4 Avalanche cores with a maximum frequency of 3.5 GHz 4 Blizzard cores with a maximum frequency of 2.4 GHz |
4 Firestorm cores with a maximum frequency of 3.2 GHz 4 Icestorm cores with a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz |
cache memory |
16 MB shared L2 cache and 320 KB L1 cache for each of the powerful cores 4 megabytes of shared L2 cache and 192 kilobytes of L1 cache for each low-power core 8 MB system cache for the entire chip |
16 MB shared L2 cache and 320 KB L1 cache for each of the powerful cores 4 megabytes of shared L2 cache and 192 kilobytes of L1 cache for each low-power core 8 MB system cache for the entire chip |
12MB shared L2 cache and 320KB L1 cache for each Firestorm core 4 MB shared L2 cache and 192 KB L1 cache for each Icestorm core 8 MB system cache for the entire chip |
memory bass |
128 bits |
128 bits |
128 bits |
DRAM |
8 to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 |
8 to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 |
8 or 16 GB LPDDR4x-4266 |
Memory bandwidth |
100 GB per second |
100 GB per second |
68.2 gigabytes per second |
GPU |
8 or 10 cores with hardware support of ray tracing |
8 or 10 cores |
7 or 8 cores |
Like the last two generations, the M3 chip uses a combination of 4 high-power cores and 4 low-power cores, respectively, with maximum frequencies of 4.05 and 2.75 GHz as CPU. Apple has made minor changes in the architecture of the cores, and the main difference of the cores is the 15% increase in frequency compared to the M2 cores.
Apple has not even changed the amount of cache memory of the M3 chip compared to the M2; Each of the high-power and low-power cores have access to 320 and 192 KB of ultra-fast L1 cache, respectively, the set of four high-power and low-power cores also have access to 16 and 4 MB of L2 cache, respectively, while the system cache is 8 MB for the set of chip processing blocks. GPU and CPU are included.
The M3 chip is used in Apple laptops in two versions with 8- and 10-core graphics processors. We had the MacBook Air with 8-core graphics available for review, which in total, just like the last generation, has 128 execution units with 1024 calculation and logic units in its heart, which operate at an almost identical frequency of 1.38 GHz.
The main difference between the M3 graphics compared to the previous generation is the addition of the Ray Tracing hardware accelerator, Mesh shading, and Dynamic Caching technology, the latter of which allows the chip to provide the memory required by the GPU in real-time and based on the type of processing. Thus, it optimizes the amount of memory consumption.
The M3 chip uses a 16-core neural processing unit (NPU) with a computing power of 18 trillion operations per second, and in addition to ProRes and ProRes Raw videos, it now has a separate engine for AV1 video codec decoding. Due to its two 64-bit channels and support for LPDDR5X-6400 RAM, this chip can achieve a bandwidth of 102 GB/s for data exchange with its integrated RAM.
Performance of the MacBook Air M3 in benchmarks while plugged in |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laptop/benchmark |
Technical Specifications |
Web browsing |
Performance in graphics |
CPU performance in rendering |
CPU computing power |
GPU computing power |
3 Dark |
CineBench R23 |
GeekBench 6 |
GeekBench 6 |
|||
Speedometer 2.1 |
TimeSpy |
Single Multi |
Single Multi |
OpenCL Metal/Vulkan |
||
DirectX 12 |
||||||
MacBook Air 2024 |
Apple M3 8 core GPU |
680 |
— |
1897 9872 |
3143 2008 |
25845 41671 |
Zenbook 14 |
Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc GPU |
396 |
3453 |
1637 13367 |
2290 12256 |
34889 38268 |
MacBook Pro 2022 |
Apple M2 10-core GPU |
407 |
— |
1579 8730 |
2581 9641 |
28852 42673 |
MacBook Air 2022 |
Apple M2 8 core GPU |
405 |
— |
1577 8476 |
2578 9655 |
27846 39735 |
MacBook Pro 2020 |
Apple M1 8 core GPU |
209 |
— |
1512 7778 |
2335 8315 |
21646 32743 |
MacBook Pro 14-inch 2021 |
M1 Max 24Core GPU |
300 |
— |
1549 12508 |
2378 12239 |
65432 101045 |
MacBook M3 appears about 20-25% faster than M2 in single-core and multi-core benchmarks, and in comparison with M1, it increases its superiority to about 35-45%; Therefore, considering the 15% increase in frequency and the improvement of TSMC’s manufacturing process, it seems that Apple has not changed much in the architecture; But in any case, CPU performance on par with the M1 Pro is a surprising result for the M3.
Compared to the new Asus ultrabook with the Core Ultra 7 155H chip, MacBook Air M3 leads by 15-35% in single-core benchmarks; But in multi-core benchmarks, it loses the field to the competitor with a single-digit difference of up to 25%. We will talk more about the difference between the two chips in productivity and power consumption.
Apple laptops have a stunning performance in terms of web surfing experience and M3 has taken this performance to a whole new level; MacBook Air 2024 outperforms Asus Ultrabook 2024 with a 65% difference in the Zoomit web browsing test. The stunning superiority of the MacBook Air shows that Apple’s laptop offers faster and smoother performance on the web.
Apple’s new ultrabook appears in almost the same level of computing processing as the last generation. It seems that M3 remains behind its Intel competitor by 25% in the processes that take place on the basis of the OpenCL framework; But instead, thanks to Apple’s exclusive Metal framework, it surpasses the performance of Core Ultra 7 in processes based on Vulkan, with a difference of 10%.
Let’s skip the benchmarks and talk about how the MacBook Air 2024 performs in professional software and games. For this, we considered Photoshop and Premiere Pro software, Python code execution, and the Rise of the Tomb Raider game.
The set of games available for macOS is much more limited than for Windows; However, thanks to the tool that Apple introduced at WWDC 2023 for porting Windows games (Game Porting Toolkit), some were able to run titles such as Medium and Cyberpunk 2077 on Macs with powerful graphics processors such as the M2 Max, and it is hoped that in the future, this same tool, pave the way for more games to be released.
We were able to run the old game Rise of the Tomb Raider at 1200p resolution, High graphics settings and an average frame rate of 50.5 fps, which shows an advantage of about 25 percent of the M3 compared to the M2.
MacBook Air M3 performance while playing Rise of the Tomb Raider game
MacBook Air M3 works about 10 to 20 percent faster than its two previous generations and ZenBook 14 while using Photoshop software for tasks such as resizing large photos and implementing the blur effect or lens correction.
MacBook Air M3 performance in Photoshop software
In Premier Pro software, while performing tasks such as blur effect implementation, image sharpening, or 4K video output, the performance of the device is 20-30% better than the MacBook Air M2 and Zenbook 14.
Performance of MacBook Air M3 in Premier Pro software
Note that in software such as Premiere Pro, where we are dealing with heavy projects, the low RAM overshadows the performance level and you may even get stuck in scenarios like editing 4K videos. Next, we will talk about the MacBook Air M3 RAM.
The MacBook Air was able to run Zoomit’s Python code in about 45 seconds, which is about 13 seconds faster than the M2 and 33 percent faster than the M1.
MacBook Air M3 performance while running Python code
One of the most attractive features of MacBooks is that they work equally well, whether connected to electricity or relying on batteries; For example, when running Python code while plugged in, the MacBook Air M3 beats the ZenBook 14 by just 4 seconds; But by disconnecting the laptops from the electricity and Zenbook’s performance drop, the time difference reaches 11 seconds!
In addition to running Python code, the MacBook Air also displays similar performance in other software in both plugged-in and battery-powered states; In the table below, you can see the difference in performance of MacBook Air M3 in Plugged and UnPlugged modes in a number of users:
Performance of MacBook Air 2024 when connected to electricity and with battery |
||
---|---|---|
Test/Performance |
Plugged result |
Result UnPlugged |
CineBench 2024 (MultiCore) |
574 |
573 |
Speedometer 2.1 |
680 |
681 |
Photoshop |
6488 |
6588 |
Premiere Pro |
3868 |
3881 |
Python |
44.6 seconds |
44.7 seconds |
In the MacBook Air 2022 review, we said that the lack of an active cooling system (fan) makes this ultrabook unable to provide stable performance under continuous processing loads. Now it’s time for MacBook Air 2024 with the same cooling system; But this time with a more optimized chip, it will be wider. Does the MacBook Air M3 offer stable performance?
To evaluate the cooling system, the performance stability level and measure the power consumption and other parameters of the MacBook Air M3, we first ran the CineBench R23 multi-core test on the device for 30 minutes consecutively in both power-connected and battery-based modes; Then we went to the 20-minute Wild Life Extreme test.
MacBook Air 2024 laptop performance under continuous processing load |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Laptop status |
CPU score at first |
CPU score after 30 minutes |
GPU score first |
GPU score after 20 minutes |
Connected to electricity |
9872 |
7841 |
6989 |
5207 |
with battery |
9833 |
8322 |
6996 |
5271 |
MacBook Air M3 shows more or less the same behavior whether in Plugged or UnPlugged mode; After 30 minutes, the CPU performance drops by about 15-20%, and in a 20-minute graphics processing load, the GPU drops by 25%.
Contrary to the numbers stated in the technical specifications of the M3 chip, the MacBook Air 2024, whether in multi-core or single-core processing, never reaches the frequency of 4.05 GHz in powerful cores; In my measurements, the frequency of the most powerful cores in the multi-core test remained at 3.7 GHz for a few seconds; But it immediately begins the gradual process of decline and reaches below 2.5 GHz from the 10th minute, which is lower than the stable 2.75 GHz frequency of low-power cores!
Read more: Asus Zenbook 14 OLED laptop review
CPU frequency in MacBook Air M3
The frequency drop process starts when the temperature of the hottest point of the chip reaches 103 degrees Celsius; It seems that Apple has adopted a more conservative strategy this year; Because in MacBook Air M2, the maximum temperature of the chip reaches 109 degrees Celsius. The temperature of 103 degrees of the chip continues for 5-6 minutes and then, thanks to the frequency drop, it decreases to the range below 90 degrees Celsius.
CPU temperature on MacBook Air M3
The temperature of the laptop body rises to 46-47 degrees Celsius, especially in the upper area of the keyboard; But in general, the body heat is not such that you cannot continue working with the laptop.
CPU consumption in MacBook Air M3
As you can see in the power consumption graph, the CPU consumes about 21 watts in the first few seconds; But as the body heats up, the power consumption gradually decreases and after a few minutes it reaches below 10 watts and reaches the range of 7-8 watts.
As you can see from the graphs below, the M3 GPU also follows a similar path to performance degradation from overheating the device.
GPU consumption in MacBook Air M3
GPU temperature on MacBook Air M3
GPU frequency on MacBook Air M3
About 2-3 minutes after the start of graphic processing, in order to prevent the chip temperature from exceeding 103 degrees Celsius, the frequency of the GPU drops from about 1350 MHz and its power consumption from about 14 watts to 1000 MHz and below 8 watts. is approaching
My tests show that the MacBook Air M3 uses its powerful core stably with a frequency of about 3,750 MHz in single-core processing, this number is about 3,200 and 2,980 MHz in the MacBook Air M2 and MacBook Air M1 laptops, respectively.
In order to have a general outline and limits of architecture changes and IPC (the number of instructions executed per processing cycle), we can divide GeekBench’s single-core score by the chips’ single-core frequency; Note that this measure is not exact and only provides a general picture of the state of architectural changes. To accurately measure IPC, one should go to an expensive tool such as SPECView, which unfortunately is not available in Iran.
Ratio of performance to CPU frequency
To be more precise, what you see in the graph above is the ratio of single-core performance to CPU frequency in three generations of MacBook Air laptops with M1, M2, and M3 chips. In this chart, I have considered the MacBook Air M1 as a benchmark so that we can compare the other two chips relatively. The numbers say that the architectural changes in M3 have a 4 and 7 percent impact on the performance of this chip compared to M2 and M1, which is not a significant improvement.
In the graph below, you can see the ratio of M3’s performance to its power consumption compared to previous generations and the Core Ultra 7 155H chip. Note that the amount of power consumed by the chips is not stable and after a few seconds, it deviates from its maximum value; Therefore, the graph below was created by running CineBench R23 once and based on the average power consumption during the benchmark execution period, so that we can obtain the ratio of performance to power consumption in the best performance condition of the laptop.
The ratio of performance to CPU power consumption
My measurements show that the M3 consumes an average of 4.9 and 19.1 watts when running the CineBench R23 single-core and multi-core benchmarks, respectively; While these numbers are equal to 8 and 20.2 watts for the M2 and 23 and 37.8 watts for the Core Ultra 7 155H, respectively, this shows the stunning efficiency of the M3; But if you consider the numbers obtained in the previous chart, you will realize that TSMC’s optimized manufacturing process has more influence on this amazing productivity than IPC and Apple’s architecture improvements.
The M3’s incredible efficiency also contributes to the MacBook Air M3’s excellent charging performance. Apple uses the same 52.6-watt-hour battery as the MacBook Air M2 in its new ultrabook and says that this laptop can charge for about 18 hours, just like the previous generation.
MacBook Air 2024 battery life compared to other laptops |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laptop/Test |
Functional profile |
hardware |
Display |
Battery capacity |
Play offline video |
Everyday use |
Processor and graphics |
Dimensions, resolution, and refresh rate |
watt-hours |
720p Video |
PCMark 10 |
||
minute: hour |
minute: hour |
|||||
MacBook Air 2024 |
— |
Apple M3 8 core GPU |
13.6 inches and 60 Hz 1664 x 2560 pixels |
52.6 |
14:13 |
— |
Zenbook 14 |
Performance |
Core Ultra 7-155H Intel Arc |
14 inches and 120 Hz 1800 x 2880 pixels |
75 |
17:25 |
9:09 |
Galaxy Book 3 Ultra |
Performance |
Core i7-13700H RTX 4050 |
16 inches and 120 Hz 1880 x 2880 pixels |
76 |
11:00 |
6:21 |
MacBook Pro 2022 |
— |
Apple M2 10-core GPU |
13.3 inches and 60 Hz 1600 x 2560 pixels |
58.2 |
26:18 |
— |
MacBook Air 2022 |
— |
Apple M2 8 core GPU |
13.6 inches and 60 Hz 1664 x 2560 pixels |
52.6 |
14:11 |
— |
MacBook Pro 2020 |
— |
Apple M1 8 core GPU |
13.3 inches and 60 Hz 1600 x 2560 pixels |
58.2 |
16:47 |
— |
MacBook Pro 14-inch 2021 |
— |
M1 Max 24Core GPU |
14.2 inches and 120 Hz 1964 x 3024 pixels |
70 |
18:14 |
— |
The MacBook Air 2024 was able to play our benchmark HD video for a little over 14 hours, just like the previous generation, in standard Zoomit conditions, which includes 200 nits brightness (about 70% brightness) and flight mode activation, which is an impressive result; But it is about 3 hours less than the Asus Zenbook 14 Ultrabook with a larger 75 watt-hour battery.
… and 8GB RAM for everyone
Unfortunately, this year Apple did not fall short either, and in 2024, it released the basic version of its $1,100 ultrabook with 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of SSD. If you buy from Apple’s website, you can order 16GB or 24GB of RAM and 512GB, 1TB, and 2TB of SSD; Of course, to go to each higher step, you have to pay 200 dollars more; For example, the MacBook Air 2024 with 16 GB RAM and 512 GB SSD will cost you about $1,500.
If the base version of the 8GB MacBook Air disappointed you, you can be glad that Apple has moved away from the cowardly strategy of using a NAND chip for the SSD of the base version of the MacBook Air, which ended up halving the read and write speeds, and this year all models with 2 sells NAND chips; The maximum speed of 4 and 3.5 GB/s for reading and writing is lower than Windows competitors; But it’s not bad either.
The average SSD speed of the base model MacBook Air 2024 compared to other MacBooks |
||
---|---|---|
Models / Performance |
Sequential reading rate (UK gigabytes) |
Sequential write rate (UK gigabytes) |
MacBook Air M3 |
2.63 |
2.58 |
MacBook Air M2 |
1.03 |
2.32 |
MacBook Pro M1 |
2.28 |
2.46 |
There is a lot of debate on social networks about whether 8GB of RAM is sufficient or not. A number of Apple fans, with the logic that “MacBook RAM has high speed and memory swap technology is available to help SSD as RAM”, say that in many applications, 8 GB of RAM is enough; But you should pay attention to several points:
1. The data is not just traveling between the chip and RAM, which can compensate for the low capacity of the RAM by just having a high data exchange rate; In some applications, such as modeling or graphic work, several gigabytes of data may be stored in RAM for a relatively long time. Let’s say that the data exchange rate between the RAM and the M3 or M2 chip is no longer the best, and some chips such as the Core Ultra 7 155H offer a higher rate.
2. Memory swap is not a magical and new technology; The rest of the operating systems, such as Windows, also have similar technology; But it should be noted that swap memory reduces the useful life of SSD and the speed of SSD is not at the level of RAM that can fully play its role; For example, in MacBook Air M3, the data exchange rate between RAM and chip also reaches 102 GB/s; While the Mac SSD read and write rate is maybe one twentieth of this number.
3. Software tools are constantly developing, and their need for hardware resources, including RAM, also increases day by day. On the other hand, the user also buys the MacBook for a few years of use; Therefore, due to the lack of ability to upgrade RAM, one may face problems over time.
Aside from all the talk about Rome, a number of domestic sellers are also taking advantage of the opportunity; For example, Apple charges the same amount for a MacBook Air with 16 GB of RAM and 256 GB of SSD as for an 8 | 512 GB considered; But in Iran, configuring MacBook with more RAM is much more expensive than configuring with more SSD.
MacBook Air M3; Attractive and not very valuable
The MacBook Air M3 is by no means a bad product; But what makes buying this ultrabook illogical is the great value of its predecessors, especially the MacBook Air M1, especially if we consider their significant price difference.
For a person who does not have a laptop and is looking for a compact and well-made ultrabook for daily and light use, the base model of MacBook Air M1, which is currently sold at a price of 47-48 million Tomans, is a very desirable option; A device with an integrated metal body, a high-quality display, a very good keyboard and trackpad, excellent charging and fast performance that meets all the needs of an individual with daily use, journalism or light content production; Without the need to take an irrational action, about 25 million Tomans more will be spent to buy M3.
A person who already has a MacBook Air M2 and uses it for daily use should not go for the MacBook Air M3; Because it will not experience any significant changes; Except for the faster SSD, which is hardly noticeable in everyday use. For a current Mac M1 user, it might make more sense to upgrade to the M3.
For people who use laptops for tasks such as programming or video editing, the 8GB version of the MacBook Air M3 is not really a rational choice. If these people prefer macOS, it is better to go for used models with a budget of 70-75 million tomans, such as M1 Pro with 16 GB RAM, or if they are comfortable with Windows, high-quality options such as HP Envy with Core i9-13900H processor. And 16 GB of RAM will be a reasonable option for them.
What are the obstacles on the way for humans to reach Mars?
Unveiling of OpenAI new artificial intelligence capabilities
Samsung S95B OLED TV review
Discovery of the brain circuit that manages inflammation
History of the world; From the Big Bang to the creation of the planet Earth
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro review
The biography of Pavel Durov
Is Telegram really safe?
AI PC; revolutionary technology of the future?
Motorola Edge 50 Pro review, technical specifications
Popular
-
Technology10 months ago
Who has checked our Whatsapp profile viewed my Whatsapp August 2023
-
Technology11 months ago
How to use ChatGPT on Android and iOS
-
Technology10 months ago
Second WhatsApp , how to install and download dual WhatsApp August 2023
-
Technology11 months ago
The best Android tablets 2023, buying guide
-
AI1 year ago
Uber replaces human drivers with robots
-
Humans1 year ago
Cell Rover analyzes the inside of cells without destroying them
-
Technology11 months ago
The best photography cameras 2023, buying guide and price
-
Technology11 months ago
How to prevent automatic download of applications on Samsung phones